![]() | 100 euro note has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 20 euro note was copied or moved into 100 euro note with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Plarem ( talk · contribs) 20:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I am going to give the above review, with no comments and put this on hold. When you give this article a makeover, I am going to put it 'on review' again. Then it will pass/fail. Ok? – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 21:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
PASS – — Congrats on bringing the
The section on security features appears to be a copied and/or closely paraphrased from the European Central Bank who haven't released the content in a compatible license. I haven't checked the other sections yet, but I will either do so soon or list it for copyvio check. — Spaceman Spiff 17:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Please extend the 'on hold' time by 12-24hrs. as I just found out about this today. – Plarem (
User
talk) 14:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 100 euro note. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | 100 euro note has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 20 euro note was copied or moved into 100 euro note with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Plarem ( talk · contribs) 20:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I am going to give the above review, with no comments and put this on hold. When you give this article a makeover, I am going to put it 'on review' again. Then it will pass/fail. Ok? – Plarem ( User talk contribs) 21:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
PASS – — Congrats on bringing the
The section on security features appears to be a copied and/or closely paraphrased from the European Central Bank who haven't released the content in a compatible license. I haven't checked the other sections yet, but I will either do so soon or list it for copyvio check. — Spaceman Spiff 17:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Please extend the 'on hold' time by 12-24hrs. as I just found out about this today. – Plarem (
User
talk) 14:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 100 euro note. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)