 | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep, withdrawn by nominator. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
As well as those listed at the AfD I have found the following that could be used to improve the article:
- http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/archives/2002/10/31/0000177790
- http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90880/6293965.html
- http://www.tballiance.org/newscenter/view-brief.php?id=85
- Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty, The Lancet, Volume 361, Issue 9359, Pages 712-713, R.Horton. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673603126657
- And no doubt others. Bigger digger ( talk) 23:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Always good to get a NYT mention: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/magazine/17charity.t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Bigger digger ( talk) 23:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The example given in the intro paragraph doesnt make sense. Why would you need to commit resources to medical research for illnesses which are preventable? If they are preventable then solutions have already been researched. The issue then is one of implementation and not one of where medical research is devoted. Honestly it sounds more like liberal marxist anti-establishment propaganda than it does a rational statement. 50.34.41.50 ( talk) 00:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 6 June 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep, withdrawn by nominator. |
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
As well as those listed at the AfD I have found the following that could be used to improve the article:
- http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/archives/2002/10/31/0000177790
- http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90880/6293965.html
- http://www.tballiance.org/newscenter/view-brief.php?id=85
- Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty, The Lancet, Volume 361, Issue 9359, Pages 712-713, R.Horton. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673603126657
- And no doubt others. Bigger digger ( talk) 23:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Always good to get a NYT mention: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/magazine/17charity.t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Bigger digger ( talk) 23:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 21:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The example given in the intro paragraph doesnt make sense. Why would you need to commit resources to medical research for illnesses which are preventable? If they are preventable then solutions have already been researched. The issue then is one of implementation and not one of where medical research is devoted. Honestly it sounds more like liberal marxist anti-establishment propaganda than it does a rational statement. 50.34.41.50 ( talk) 00:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)