This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
.476 Enfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from .476 Enfield appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,276 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I tagged WP Canada & WP LEO, since the .476 Enfield Mk 1 revolver was a NWMP weapon. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 05:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
There appear to be some discrepancies between this article and that for the .455 Webley concerning loadings for the latter (I am not expert in such matters.) — Robert Greer ( talk) 21:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Changed Arabic numerals for Mark variations to Roman numerals. British nomenclature did not use Arabic numerals for Marks until after WW II, well past the time when this cartridge was in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.4.142.104 ( talk) 16:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
What was the muzzle-energy of the .476 compared to the .455? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.130.70 ( talk) 11:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
After trying and checking with my collection I found this round only can loaded when the Revolver is marked 455/476. This means the chamber is tapered in shape, not steped like the normal chamber in the normal .455 round. The book: Cartridges of the World is wrong so don't quote it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nambu44 ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
.476 Enfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from .476 Enfield appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,276 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I tagged WP Canada & WP LEO, since the .476 Enfield Mk 1 revolver was a NWMP weapon. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 05:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
There appear to be some discrepancies between this article and that for the .455 Webley concerning loadings for the latter (I am not expert in such matters.) — Robert Greer ( talk) 21:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Changed Arabic numerals for Mark variations to Roman numerals. British nomenclature did not use Arabic numerals for Marks until after WW II, well past the time when this cartridge was in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.4.142.104 ( talk) 16:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
What was the muzzle-energy of the .476 compared to the .455? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.130.70 ( talk) 11:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
After trying and checking with my collection I found this round only can loaded when the Revolver is marked 455/476. This means the chamber is tapered in shape, not steped like the normal chamber in the normal .455 round. The book: Cartridges of the World is wrong so don't quote it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nambu44 ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)