This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Retarget, 27 August 2023, see discussion. Provisionally retarget to Emoji without prejudice against retargeting to an article about the specific concept represented, 2 March 2017, see discussion.

Re this edit, just pointing out, ‎The Banner, that neither of the two targets could be said to be better conforming to the outcome of the RfD discussion. – Uanfala 18:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply

A link to a disambiguation pages is a link to nowhere. The Banner  talk 18:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply

@ The Banner: It's not a "link", it's a redirect. And it's not to nowhere, it's to a place that defines the emoji. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply

No, it does not define the emoji as it does not lead to an article but to a disambiguation page. The Banner  talk 18:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The emoji is a "grimace", and the page says a grimace is "a type of facial expression usually of disgust, disapproval, or pain". That's a pretty clear definition to me. You seem to be stumbling over the fact that it's a disambiguation. That's not a problem—see {{ R from ambiguous term}}. Wikipedia has thousands of redirects of that form. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Certes: should redirect to grimace, since that is its official description. See U+1F62C Emoticons (Unicode block), https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-list.html. Wqwt ( talk) 06:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC) reply

That sounds reasonable. Paging Trillfendi. Certes ( talk) 11:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC) reply