This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance). New Zealand: Politics / Māori Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as Top-importance).

I've dropped the assessment back to Start class. There are hardly any sources with this article, let along inline references. As a politics article, it is missing basic elements like a NZ parlbox and a succession box. I'll add to the article myself as I find some time and inclination. Schwede 66 17:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC) reply

More sources: Schwede 66 19:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC) reply

• DNZB
• NZ history online

I have again reverted the subjective opinion by an IP editor that Ngata was "a prominent supporter" of the 1860s land confiscations. Such a statement needs to be sourced to a reliable published source. It is not up to Wikipedia editors to decide which individuals were prominent in holding a particular view. The same editor has tried to similarly impose his/her own view of history at [1]. Please stop your disruptive editing. BlackCab ( talk) 10:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply