This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone expand on the former names of the island? What it was called before Ile de la Cite? 132.205.44.5 ( talk) 04:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes and can someone also please explain the name in the article? What does it mean, "Island of the City" or something like that? merci Gryffindor 10:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
http://www.ile-de-la-cite-fr.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.131.27 ( talk) 01:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Again someone has reverted proper sized pictures to excessively big ones. In fact, without real argumentation that "we do it like this" or "the pictures are now too small".
Downside of the excessively big pictures is that they cause white areas and tend to take over the screen, especially for people with smaller screens. The Banner talk 16:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC) UTC)
Once again, unfortunately, the images in galleries have been reduced in size so that no details are visible.. Each picture has to be enlarged to see anything at all. There's unused white space in the galleries.
How about a compromise? Packed galleries with a height of 150? SiefkinDR ( talk) 16:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone expand on the former names of the island? What it was called before Ile de la Cite? 132.205.44.5 ( talk) 04:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes and can someone also please explain the name in the article? What does it mean, "Island of the City" or something like that? merci Gryffindor 10:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
http://www.ile-de-la-cite-fr.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.131.27 ( talk) 01:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Again someone has reverted proper sized pictures to excessively big ones. In fact, without real argumentation that "we do it like this" or "the pictures are now too small".
Downside of the excessively big pictures is that they cause white areas and tend to take over the screen, especially for people with smaller screens. The Banner talk 16:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC) UTC)
Once again, unfortunately, the images in galleries have been reduced in size so that no details are visible.. Each picture has to be enlarged to see anything at all. There's unused white space in the galleries.
How about a compromise? Packed galleries with a height of 150? SiefkinDR ( talk) 16:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)