This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical music: Compositions This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles This article is supported by Compositions task force. Russia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rather than Horowitz's 1985 DG recording (which has a rather obvious mistake about halfway through), I would either recomment the 1986 live from Moscow recording (also on DG) or the 1962 studio Columbia. THD3 ( talk) 14:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Now changed, thanks for pointing that out. Etincelles ♬♬ ^(talk) 15:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC) reply

The last sentence of "Analysis" does not make sense (at least in English).

It would also be nice if the "Analysis" could attempt to explain the piece's mysterious beauty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.236.73.167 ( talk) 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply