This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are some people who believe this article shouldn't exist because this band isn't notable enough despite their nationwide success. I disagree with their position however and would prefer that User:Delicious carbuncle (the main antagonist of this article) would put his opinion here and not edit the article to send people to another article that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject. IzzyReal ( talk) 20:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Also, why not do a quick Google search and actually learn about the notability of the band or read their Wikipedia article for quick reference? Please if you are going to ignore that they are a notable band then you could at least have it redirect to the band's page instead of to an article about the cemetery. IzzyReal ( talk) 21:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
This just got brought to my attention. The band is absolutely notable, in the same manner that Dr. Steel was decided to be notable. They do not have nationwide chart success, but within their genre of music and the subculture in which they place themselves, they are considered the most prominent steampunk band, and easily pass WP:Band, sections A:7 and C:1 and 5, and the list of references appended here clearly show that the album itself is notable in the genre. However, this should be taken up on the main Abney Park (band) page at any rate, not have this page blanked out because of someone's objection to the band itself. If Delicious carbuncle does not cease vandalizing this page, I will petition to have it semi-protected and may request sanctions. -- Jonnybgoode44 ( talk) 22:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
At this time the article includes an entire section of "Reviews", from sources whose reliability are suspect don't seem that reliable. Perhaps it should be removed. It doesn't seem to comply with WP:RS and WP:NPOV.-- Pink Bull 02:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are some people who believe this article shouldn't exist because this band isn't notable enough despite their nationwide success. I disagree with their position however and would prefer that User:Delicious carbuncle (the main antagonist of this article) would put his opinion here and not edit the article to send people to another article that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject. IzzyReal ( talk) 20:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Also, why not do a quick Google search and actually learn about the notability of the band or read their Wikipedia article for quick reference? Please if you are going to ignore that they are a notable band then you could at least have it redirect to the band's page instead of to an article about the cemetery. IzzyReal ( talk) 21:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
This just got brought to my attention. The band is absolutely notable, in the same manner that Dr. Steel was decided to be notable. They do not have nationwide chart success, but within their genre of music and the subculture in which they place themselves, they are considered the most prominent steampunk band, and easily pass WP:Band, sections A:7 and C:1 and 5, and the list of references appended here clearly show that the album itself is notable in the genre. However, this should be taken up on the main Abney Park (band) page at any rate, not have this page blanked out because of someone's objection to the band itself. If Delicious carbuncle does not cease vandalizing this page, I will petition to have it semi-protected and may request sanctions. -- Jonnybgoode44 ( talk) 22:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
At this time the article includes an entire section of "Reviews", from sources whose reliability are suspect don't seem that reliable. Perhaps it should be removed. It doesn't seem to comply with WP:RS and WP:NPOV.-- Pink Bull 02:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)