This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Drmccreedy: Why did you add the character æ̀ in this edit? It isn't in Unicode. Is it used in some language? — Eru· tuon 01:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Does anyone know the origin of the grapheme? I wonder if the Christian missionaries to the English invented it to record a sound between /a/ and /e/, which they did not have in Latin, or if it already existed? Snugglepuss ( talk) 18:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
What about Ae, joined, in "title case"? So it begins a titled word like Aeschylus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9DE1:1260:F887:AE5A:B1B:1E29 ( talk) 03:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aelig. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Aelig until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ææ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Ææ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thinking it might be worth mentioning as a pop culture remark. Thoughts?
X Æ A-12 Electricmaster ( talk) 10:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The article claims that Æ was called æsc in Old English, but the supporting source actually just says that the rune transliterated as æ was named æsc. This is not the same thing as the Latin character being called æsc. It's true that Þ and Ƿ inherited runic names, but unlike Þ and Ƿ, Æ wasn't originally a rune, so it might not be safe to assume it inherited a runic name. A real source for the claim should be found, or the claim should be taken out of the article. Hurlebatte ( talk) 15:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Drmccreedy: Why did you add the character æ̀ in this edit? It isn't in Unicode. Is it used in some language? — Eru· tuon 01:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Does anyone know the origin of the grapheme? I wonder if the Christian missionaries to the English invented it to record a sound between /a/ and /e/, which they did not have in Latin, or if it already existed? Snugglepuss ( talk) 18:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
What about Ae, joined, in "title case"? So it begins a titled word like Aeschylus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9DE1:1260:F887:AE5A:B1B:1E29 ( talk) 03:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aelig. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Aelig until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ææ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Ææ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thinking it might be worth mentioning as a pop culture remark. Thoughts?
X Æ A-12 Electricmaster ( talk) 10:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The article claims that Æ was called æsc in Old English, but the supporting source actually just says that the rune transliterated as æ was named æsc. This is not the same thing as the Latin character being called æsc. It's true that Þ and Ƿ inherited runic names, but unlike Þ and Ƿ, Æ wasn't originally a rune, so it might not be safe to assume it inherited a runic name. A real source for the claim should be found, or the claim should be taken out of the article. Hurlebatte ( talk) 15:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)