![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are there no links (don't know the proper name) to other language Wikipedias? The
Esperanto,
Hungarian,
Polish,
Russian, and
Ukrainian Wikipedias have this article, too.
Also, they say that the Line was build in 1943-1944, not in 1942-1943 as per this barely sourced article.-- Adûnâi ( talk) 19:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
The 453-1 ratio especially is a blatant and obvious lie that isn't remotely believable. Notably, the Hungarian Wikipedia article lacks this claim completely and correctly states that the Arpad Line was bypassed by Soviet mechanized forces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.33.26 ( talk) 04:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
note: the above post was made by me, I was on mobile and forgot my password Jtrainor ( talk) 14:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are there no links (don't know the proper name) to other language Wikipedias? The
Esperanto,
Hungarian,
Polish,
Russian, and
Ukrainian Wikipedias have this article, too.
Also, they say that the Line was build in 1943-1944, not in 1942-1943 as per this barely sourced article.-- Adûnâi ( talk) 19:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
The 453-1 ratio especially is a blatant and obvious lie that isn't remotely believable. Notably, the Hungarian Wikipedia article lacks this claim completely and correctly states that the Arpad Line was bypassed by Soviet mechanized forces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.33.26 ( talk) 04:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
note: the above post was made by me, I was on mobile and forgot my password Jtrainor ( talk) 14:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)