This is a log of user-block/unblock actions. Auto-blocked IP addresses are not listed here, but can be found at
Special:AutoblockList. See
Special:BlockList for the full list of currently operational blocks. See
Wikipedia:Blocking policy for further details.
You may enter the name of the blocking/unblocking administrator and/or the user or IP who was blocked/unblocked.
Performer is the name of the admin, without any prefix
Target is the name of the user, IP or IP range, written with the prefix "User:"
12:44, 1 March 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17548 (They did not look at the content of the last edit, just the edit summary. Now quit wasting my time. I have one reply to make on talk, then I will go away.)
12:41, 1 March 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
172talkcontribs(They did not look at the content of the last edit, just the edit summary. Now quit wasting my time. I have one reply to make on talk, then I will go away.)
23:20, 28 February 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17487 (Listen, I am busy, and I have to post something on talk. Quit playing games with me. I did not break the 3RR and should not have been blocked.)
22:54, 28 February 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17481 (Blocking a user for no reason who did not violate the 3RR is forbidden as well. Take a look at the page history.)
22:45, 28 February 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17480 (Well, blocking a user for no reason who did not violate the 3RR is forbidden as well. Take a look at the page history.)
19:52, 11 February 2005172talkcontribs blocked
24.150.175.165talk with an expiration time of 24 hours(After reverting me, then another anon, then Susvolans, then Everyking, then Guanaco, and then Everyking again (in addition to failing to understand what differentiates the intro from the rest of an article), this is in order)
08:56, 29 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#15341 (ADMINS MAY NOT OVERRULE THE ARBCOM. The Arbcom has already rejected a request to apply restrictions concerning Wik to Gz. See http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=9287451)
08:56, 29 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#15344 (ADMINS MAY NOT OVERRULE THE ARBCOM. The Arbcom has already rejected a request to apply restrictions concerning Wik to Gz. See http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=9287451)
03:22, 28 January 2005172talkcontribs blocked
195.70.48.242talk with an expiration time of 4 days(One week blocks causing a severe disruption are established protocol. Note, e.g., Neutrality's one week block of Genyo for behaving in a similarly disruptive manner on
History of Russia.)
00:10, 28 January 2005172talkcontribs blocked
195.70.48.242talk with an expiration time of 5 days(This user was blocked for deliberately causing disruption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Disruption Fred Bauder is lying when he says that I am involved in a dispute with this user. The only dispute is the ax that Fred Bauder)
22:46, 27 January 2005172talkcontribs blocked
195.70.48.242talk with an expiration time of 5 days(Fred Bauder, I was not and I am not in a dispute with this editor. That is a lie. I blocked this user for personal attacks directed at Everyking and causing disruption on Talk:Joseph Stalin while I was UNINVOLVED in the conversation on the page)
22:29, 14 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
Everykingtalkcontribs(Everyking appears only to have two recent reverts. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, perhaps seeking compromise, so this does not count)
22:28, 14 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#14397 (Everyking appears only to have two recent reverts. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, perhaps seeking compromise, so this does not count)
22:07, 14 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#14396 (Everyking appears only to have two recent reverts. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, perhaps seeking compromise, so this does not count.)
This is a log of user-block/unblock actions. Auto-blocked IP addresses are not listed here, but can be found at
Special:AutoblockList. See
Special:BlockList for the full list of currently operational blocks. See
Wikipedia:Blocking policy for further details.
You may enter the name of the blocking/unblocking administrator and/or the user or IP who was blocked/unblocked.
Performer is the name of the admin, without any prefix
Target is the name of the user, IP or IP range, written with the prefix "User:"
12:44, 1 March 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17548 (They did not look at the content of the last edit, just the edit summary. Now quit wasting my time. I have one reply to make on talk, then I will go away.)
12:41, 1 March 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
172talkcontribs(They did not look at the content of the last edit, just the edit summary. Now quit wasting my time. I have one reply to make on talk, then I will go away.)
23:20, 28 February 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17487 (Listen, I am busy, and I have to post something on talk. Quit playing games with me. I did not break the 3RR and should not have been blocked.)
22:54, 28 February 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17481 (Blocking a user for no reason who did not violate the 3RR is forbidden as well. Take a look at the page history.)
22:45, 28 February 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#17480 (Well, blocking a user for no reason who did not violate the 3RR is forbidden as well. Take a look at the page history.)
19:52, 11 February 2005172talkcontribs blocked
24.150.175.165talk with an expiration time of 24 hours(After reverting me, then another anon, then Susvolans, then Everyking, then Guanaco, and then Everyking again (in addition to failing to understand what differentiates the intro from the rest of an article), this is in order)
08:56, 29 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#15341 (ADMINS MAY NOT OVERRULE THE ARBCOM. The Arbcom has already rejected a request to apply restrictions concerning Wik to Gz. See http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=9287451)
08:56, 29 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#15344 (ADMINS MAY NOT OVERRULE THE ARBCOM. The Arbcom has already rejected a request to apply restrictions concerning Wik to Gz. See http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=9287451)
03:22, 28 January 2005172talkcontribs blocked
195.70.48.242talk with an expiration time of 4 days(One week blocks causing a severe disruption are established protocol. Note, e.g., Neutrality's one week block of Genyo for behaving in a similarly disruptive manner on
History of Russia.)
00:10, 28 January 2005172talkcontribs blocked
195.70.48.242talk with an expiration time of 5 days(This user was blocked for deliberately causing disruption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Disruption Fred Bauder is lying when he says that I am involved in a dispute with this user. The only dispute is the ax that Fred Bauder)
22:46, 27 January 2005172talkcontribs blocked
195.70.48.242talk with an expiration time of 5 days(Fred Bauder, I was not and I am not in a dispute with this editor. That is a lie. I blocked this user for personal attacks directed at Everyking and causing disruption on Talk:Joseph Stalin while I was UNINVOLVED in the conversation on the page)
22:29, 14 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
Everykingtalkcontribs(Everyking appears only to have two recent reverts. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, perhaps seeking compromise, so this does not count)
22:28, 14 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#14397 (Everyking appears only to have two recent reverts. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, perhaps seeking compromise, so this does not count)
22:07, 14 January 2005172talkcontribs unblocked
#14396 (Everyking appears only to have two recent reverts. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, perhaps seeking compromise, so this does not count.)