01:2101:21, 6 October 2014diffhist+589
Publius Enigma
revert - The NYT article is a gossip magazine, and not an official band release. The anon posting is not an official band release.
00:5700:57, 6 October 2014diffhist+600
Publius Enigma
revert - The Publius Enigma is a hoax until confirmed to be an official band release (which it hasn't). To the contrary. Pink Floyd deny this is an official band release.
00:4100:41, 6 October 2014diffhist+600
Publius Enigma
revert - Now this has become a childish game of reverts. You have no evidence showing that the Publius poster is connected with Pink Floyd, just a 'conspiracy theory' which isn't sufficient.
00:1300:13, 6 October 2014diffhist+600
Publius Enigma
revert - The consensus by sane people is that the Enigma was a hoax. Until the Pink Floyd categorically confirm involvement with the anon poster, which they haven't, you're propagating conspiracy theories on the Wiki, which I feel is not constructive.
01:2101:21, 6 October 2014diffhist+589
Publius Enigma
revert - The NYT article is a gossip magazine, and not an official band release. The anon posting is not an official band release.
00:5700:57, 6 October 2014diffhist+600
Publius Enigma
revert - The Publius Enigma is a hoax until confirmed to be an official band release (which it hasn't). To the contrary. Pink Floyd deny this is an official band release.
00:4100:41, 6 October 2014diffhist+600
Publius Enigma
revert - Now this has become a childish game of reverts. You have no evidence showing that the Publius poster is connected with Pink Floyd, just a 'conspiracy theory' which isn't sufficient.
00:1300:13, 6 October 2014diffhist+600
Publius Enigma
revert - The consensus by sane people is that the Enigma was a hoax. Until the Pink Floyd categorically confirm involvement with the anon poster, which they haven't, you're propagating conspiracy theories on the Wiki, which I feel is not constructive.