03:1903:19, 26 June 2024diffhist+761
Kathleen Kennedy (producer)
→Career: Basic update in an extremely neutral way merely pointing out some criticism. This section is now 100% neutral and full of reliable sources. Please edit it; but if you do revert or delete it, explain clearly WHY and how it violates NPOV. Credit to unnamed IP user in comments for finding these sources.Tag: Reverted
22:1922:19, 7 May 2024diffhist+1,425
Originalism
Added a source to ensure scalia is recognized as a foundational contributor to originalism. This section needs more work but this scalia quotation that was originally removed seems highly useful and relevant
22:0122:01, 7 May 2024diffhist+11
Originalism
clarifying living constitutionalism (originalists typically believe in interpreting/applying the constitution TO modern times or CONSIDERING modern times and this point was unclear in old sentence version)
20:5720:57, 7 May 2024diffhist+1,036
Originalism
→History: Thanks for the comments. I attempted to make a neutral topic sentence introducing this section (am open to edits) and found an additional source to ensure the avoidance of any synthesis/original research concerns about the 7th amendment and originalism discussion (which I added back). Happy to discuss if these sources are insufficient or wait to add back 7th amendment sentence until better sources are found.
20:3520:35, 7 May 2024diffhist+366
Originalism
→History: in an avoidance of doubt here is an article that DIRECTLY states the proposition and is not original research. This is to specifically address any synthesis concerns.
20:2620:26, 7 May 2024diffhist+1,301
Originalism
→History: Ok I guess we cannot have a discussion about this. Maybe this version will work for you? Please actually CLICK on the links to Bruen and the 7th amendment AND see the articles; they are NOT original research (especially the actual linked wikipedia pages themselves). Happy to discuss improvements but please do NOT just simply revert it. This is NOT original research (again see BOTH the linked pages AND the linked articles). No issues with fixing the tone if anyone still disagrees
19:5019:50, 7 May 2024diffhist+2,099
Originalism
→History: This is a manual revert of part of an edit done on "21:43, 25 April 2024 edit Superb Owl". This section can be moved somewhere else or incorporated however it is well sourced, accurate and relevant. For the originalist judicial tests, there is not really an explicit source beyond the mere fact that the 7th amendment and Bruen do follow an originalist test (click on each page for this to be immediately clear). Happy to rephrase but this section is entirely accurate and sourced.Tag: Reverted
03:1903:19, 26 June 2024diffhist+761
Kathleen Kennedy (producer)
→Career: Basic update in an extremely neutral way merely pointing out some criticism. This section is now 100% neutral and full of reliable sources. Please edit it; but if you do revert or delete it, explain clearly WHY and how it violates NPOV. Credit to unnamed IP user in comments for finding these sources.Tag: Reverted
22:1922:19, 7 May 2024diffhist+1,425
Originalism
Added a source to ensure scalia is recognized as a foundational contributor to originalism. This section needs more work but this scalia quotation that was originally removed seems highly useful and relevant
22:0122:01, 7 May 2024diffhist+11
Originalism
clarifying living constitutionalism (originalists typically believe in interpreting/applying the constitution TO modern times or CONSIDERING modern times and this point was unclear in old sentence version)
20:5720:57, 7 May 2024diffhist+1,036
Originalism
→History: Thanks for the comments. I attempted to make a neutral topic sentence introducing this section (am open to edits) and found an additional source to ensure the avoidance of any synthesis/original research concerns about the 7th amendment and originalism discussion (which I added back). Happy to discuss if these sources are insufficient or wait to add back 7th amendment sentence until better sources are found.
20:3520:35, 7 May 2024diffhist+366
Originalism
→History: in an avoidance of doubt here is an article that DIRECTLY states the proposition and is not original research. This is to specifically address any synthesis concerns.
20:2620:26, 7 May 2024diffhist+1,301
Originalism
→History: Ok I guess we cannot have a discussion about this. Maybe this version will work for you? Please actually CLICK on the links to Bruen and the 7th amendment AND see the articles; they are NOT original research (especially the actual linked wikipedia pages themselves). Happy to discuss improvements but please do NOT just simply revert it. This is NOT original research (again see BOTH the linked pages AND the linked articles). No issues with fixing the tone if anyone still disagrees
19:5019:50, 7 May 2024diffhist+2,099
Originalism
→History: This is a manual revert of part of an edit done on "21:43, 25 April 2024 edit Superb Owl". This section can be moved somewhere else or incorporated however it is well sourced, accurate and relevant. For the originalist judicial tests, there is not really an explicit source beyond the mere fact that the 7th amendment and Bruen do follow an originalist test (click on each page for this to be immediately clear). Happy to rephrase but this section is entirely accurate and sourced.Tag: Reverted