19:0219:02, 28 October 2010diffhist+561
Smolensk air disaster
1) This "has not been" in this article, and 2) This "is" what the actual flight plan reads like, so in the end, it "should" be part of this article.
27 October 2010
21:3421:34, 27 October 2010diffhist−14
Smolensk air disaster
Your revisions are incorrect grammatically, and factually. There is a big difference between "in" and "near", i.e., the plane didn't crash "in" Smolensk!
19:0219:02, 28 October 2010diffhist+561
Smolensk air disaster
1) This "has not been" in this article, and 2) This "is" what the actual flight plan reads like, so in the end, it "should" be part of this article.
27 October 2010
21:3421:34, 27 October 2010diffhist−14
Smolensk air disaster
Your revisions are incorrect grammatically, and factually. There is a big difference between "in" and "near", i.e., the plane didn't crash "in" Smolensk!