23:2623:26, 28 April 2013diffhist+1,017
m
Hindi
check the census of India website. No where is the number 258 million provided even when disaggregated. This is disputed
04:3204:32, 28 April 2013diffhist+1,017
Hindi
reverting editwarrior and self proclaimed linguist Taivo's persistent attempts to under enumerate the number of Hindi speakers by dishonestly twisting the census figures which are different to that which he provides.
02:3802:38, 27 April 2013diffhist+1,017
Hindi
this article has been disputed for a long time. It deliberately falsifies the Census of India data on subjective grounds while still citing it as a footnote. It then quotes 22 year old Ethnologue data
23:3323:33, 25 April 2013diffhist+1,017
Hindi
if you cite the census of India 2001 figures, please cite the number it provides, not what you think it should provide!! Undid 'edit warrior' Taivo and Kwame's reversions
23:0723:07, 24 April 2013diffhist+1,146
Hindi
The editors have now deleted the BBC and the Census of India statistics in the opening paragraph/box. No footnote, except ethnologue, is provided there. Further down an interpretation of the what the census should state is give. I undid the changes.
23 April 2013
22:4322:43, 23 April 2013diffhist+1,146
Hindi
if you cite the census of India, provide the number it provides, not your interpretation of what it should provide. There's an attempt to underenumerate the # of Hindi speakers unlike other websites. The talk page has failed to resolve the dispute
22 April 2013
23:1423:14, 22 April 2013diffhist+747
Hindi
please see talk page. no one is interested in resolving this dispute. no real effort at a compromise is made.
23:2623:26, 28 April 2013diffhist+1,017
m
Hindi
check the census of India website. No where is the number 258 million provided even when disaggregated. This is disputed
04:3204:32, 28 April 2013diffhist+1,017
Hindi
reverting editwarrior and self proclaimed linguist Taivo's persistent attempts to under enumerate the number of Hindi speakers by dishonestly twisting the census figures which are different to that which he provides.
02:3802:38, 27 April 2013diffhist+1,017
Hindi
this article has been disputed for a long time. It deliberately falsifies the Census of India data on subjective grounds while still citing it as a footnote. It then quotes 22 year old Ethnologue data
23:3323:33, 25 April 2013diffhist+1,017
Hindi
if you cite the census of India 2001 figures, please cite the number it provides, not what you think it should provide!! Undid 'edit warrior' Taivo and Kwame's reversions
23:0723:07, 24 April 2013diffhist+1,146
Hindi
The editors have now deleted the BBC and the Census of India statistics in the opening paragraph/box. No footnote, except ethnologue, is provided there. Further down an interpretation of the what the census should state is give. I undid the changes.
23 April 2013
22:4322:43, 23 April 2013diffhist+1,146
Hindi
if you cite the census of India, provide the number it provides, not your interpretation of what it should provide. There's an attempt to underenumerate the # of Hindi speakers unlike other websites. The talk page has failed to resolve the dispute
22 April 2013
23:1423:14, 22 April 2013diffhist+747
Hindi
please see talk page. no one is interested in resolving this dispute. no real effort at a compromise is made.