A user with 8 edits. Account created on 12 March 2018.
16 April 2018
- 17:42 17:42, 16 April 2018 diff hist +482 Vadiraja Tirtha Undid revision 836714643 by Prabhanjanmutalik ( talk) Tags: Undo nowiki added
- 17:35 17:35, 16 April 2018 diff hist +734 Talk:Vadiraja Tirtha →Rujutva
- 03:30 03:30, 16 April 2018 diff hist +96 Vadiraja Tirtha Added LCCN number, OCLC number, and OL number for English reference book: "Yathiraja Vadiraja's Theertha prabandha" translated by SK Achar. Tag: Visual edit
- 03:05 03:05, 16 April 2018 diff hist −18 m Vadiraja Tirtha No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 03:03 03:03, 16 April 2018 diff hist +884 Vadiraja Tirtha Reply to "User:Prabhanjanmutalik Please discuss this in the talk page. All your references are either blogs (which are unreliable) or wikipedia entries (which you cannot do)." :Added a book source published from Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanams (TTD) Publications. Tags: nowiki added Visual edit
14 March 2018
- 00:50 00:50, 14 March 2018 diff hist +1,919 Vadiraja Tirtha Reply to "Hello, I understand your concerns and ... this does not discourage you from editing Wiki. Cheers!" - I have included books and published (close to 7) articles on Rujutva of Rajaru. Further, given the context of Sri Vadirajaru's period several articles dates back to several centuries and hence it is very crucial to understand that availability and digitization of such articles is not very trivial and laborious. Given the difference between days of modernization and previously published articles, information in other Indian languages should be accepted. Additionally, referring old articles particularly written by ' profound saints/ haridasas ' as unreliable information cannot be considered as valid reason for deletions related to 'Vadiraja's Rujutva'. Furthermore, these are largely 'facts' with substantial validations than just mere 'faiths'. Despite providing abundant information, any further deletions about 'Sri Vadirajaru's Rujutva' indicate an attempt towards deception. Tag: Visual edit
12 March 2018
- 16:18 16:18, 12 March 2018 diff hist +1,114 Vadiraja Tirtha Reply to "wordpress and wikipedia itself are not considered reliable sources. Undid revision 830045078 by Vyasarajg (talk)" - As mentioned prior, all the publishing committee in a journal article possess leading scientists in the similar area and are called as "experts" since they possess "expertise" in their respective subject. However those works cannot be commented or understood by a 'layman' unless a person has demonstrated experience to do so. Similarly, all the works of scientists in the field of Adhyatma such as Shri Sudeendra theertaru, Shri Purandara dasaru etc., can be considered as valid sources for propogating 'Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Thirtharu'. Secondly 'Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Thirtharu' is commonly accepted by large community of followers of Shri Vadirajaru and hence it do not requires additional citations than specified already. For e.g., a famous article do not mention proofs for using Newton's law or Einsteins relatively, it already means as widely accepted facts. Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 11:59 11:59, 12 March 2018 diff hist +1,114 Vadiraja Tirtha Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Tirtharu, is a common belief among large part of Madhwa community and does has proofs from Shrutis (Vedas, /info/en/?search=Vedas), Lord Vedavyasa's Puranas (/info/en/?search=Puranas) and compositions of famous haridasaru such as Purandaradasaru, Vijayadasaru and famous saints such as Shri Sudeendratheertharu of Sri Raghavendra mutt, Shri Satyadharmatheertharu of Sri Uttaradi mutt and many others. Hence it is quoted in several websites including the original website of Shri Sode Vadiraj Mutt (https://sodematha.in/parampara-details.php?id=532713). Any deletions of contents, links, proofs related to Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Tirtharu will be notified to authorities. Since wikipedia is a first-hand information website, a common belief among large part of the community should be respected. Tag: Visual edit
A user with 8 edits. Account created on 12 March 2018.
16 April 2018
- 17:42 17:42, 16 April 2018 diff hist +482 Vadiraja Tirtha Undid revision 836714643 by Prabhanjanmutalik ( talk) Tags: Undo nowiki added
- 17:35 17:35, 16 April 2018 diff hist +734 Talk:Vadiraja Tirtha →Rujutva
- 03:30 03:30, 16 April 2018 diff hist +96 Vadiraja Tirtha Added LCCN number, OCLC number, and OL number for English reference book: "Yathiraja Vadiraja's Theertha prabandha" translated by SK Achar. Tag: Visual edit
- 03:05 03:05, 16 April 2018 diff hist −18 m Vadiraja Tirtha No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 03:03 03:03, 16 April 2018 diff hist +884 Vadiraja Tirtha Reply to "User:Prabhanjanmutalik Please discuss this in the talk page. All your references are either blogs (which are unreliable) or wikipedia entries (which you cannot do)." :Added a book source published from Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanams (TTD) Publications. Tags: nowiki added Visual edit
14 March 2018
- 00:50 00:50, 14 March 2018 diff hist +1,919 Vadiraja Tirtha Reply to "Hello, I understand your concerns and ... this does not discourage you from editing Wiki. Cheers!" - I have included books and published (close to 7) articles on Rujutva of Rajaru. Further, given the context of Sri Vadirajaru's period several articles dates back to several centuries and hence it is very crucial to understand that availability and digitization of such articles is not very trivial and laborious. Given the difference between days of modernization and previously published articles, information in other Indian languages should be accepted. Additionally, referring old articles particularly written by ' profound saints/ haridasas ' as unreliable information cannot be considered as valid reason for deletions related to 'Vadiraja's Rujutva'. Furthermore, these are largely 'facts' with substantial validations than just mere 'faiths'. Despite providing abundant information, any further deletions about 'Sri Vadirajaru's Rujutva' indicate an attempt towards deception. Tag: Visual edit
12 March 2018
- 16:18 16:18, 12 March 2018 diff hist +1,114 Vadiraja Tirtha Reply to "wordpress and wikipedia itself are not considered reliable sources. Undid revision 830045078 by Vyasarajg (talk)" - As mentioned prior, all the publishing committee in a journal article possess leading scientists in the similar area and are called as "experts" since they possess "expertise" in their respective subject. However those works cannot be commented or understood by a 'layman' unless a person has demonstrated experience to do so. Similarly, all the works of scientists in the field of Adhyatma such as Shri Sudeendra theertaru, Shri Purandara dasaru etc., can be considered as valid sources for propogating 'Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Thirtharu'. Secondly 'Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Thirtharu' is commonly accepted by large community of followers of Shri Vadirajaru and hence it do not requires additional citations than specified already. For e.g., a famous article do not mention proofs for using Newton's law or Einsteins relatively, it already means as widely accepted facts. Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 11:59 11:59, 12 March 2018 diff hist +1,114 Vadiraja Tirtha Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Tirtharu, is a common belief among large part of Madhwa community and does has proofs from Shrutis (Vedas, /info/en/?search=Vedas), Lord Vedavyasa's Puranas (/info/en/?search=Puranas) and compositions of famous haridasaru such as Purandaradasaru, Vijayadasaru and famous saints such as Shri Sudeendratheertharu of Sri Raghavendra mutt, Shri Satyadharmatheertharu of Sri Uttaradi mutt and many others. Hence it is quoted in several websites including the original website of Shri Sode Vadiraj Mutt (https://sodematha.in/parampara-details.php?id=532713). Any deletions of contents, links, proofs related to Rujutva of Shri Vadiraja Tirtharu will be notified to authorities. Since wikipedia is a first-hand information website, a common belief among large part of the community should be respected. Tag: Visual edit