A user with 23 edits. Account created on 3 April 2022.
24 June 2022
- 18:30 18:30, 24 June 2022 diff hist +822 Talk:Daivadnya →My revert on 14th June: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:20 14:20, 24 June 2022 diff hist +385 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:57 13:57, 24 June 2022 diff hist +321 Talk:Daivadnya →My revert on 14th June: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:46 12:46, 24 June 2022 diff hist −38 Daivadnya Undid revision 1094774378 by Vernekar123 ( talk) Tag: Undo
- 12:45 12:45, 24 June 2022 diff hist +38 Daivadnya Asking for the source, see talk page; will be deleted if source is unreliable/not found. Tag: Reverted
21 June 2022
- 18:21 18:21, 21 June 2022 diff hist +858 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 17:50 17:50, 21 June 2022 diff hist +638 Talk:Daivadnya →My revert on 14th June: new section
- 17:38 17:38, 21 June 2022 diff hist +242 User talk:Vernekar123 →June 2022: Reply Tag: Reply
14 June 2022
- 20:45 20:45, 14 June 2022 diff hist −180 m Daivadnya →Daivajnas and Christianity: There is no citation for Daivadnya brahmins being categorized as Shudras, hence removing the statement. Tag: Reverted
5 May 2022
- 11:19 11:19, 5 May 2022 diff hist +349 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:46 10:46, 5 May 2022 diff hist +428 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:42 10:42, 5 May 2022 diff hist +407 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:39 10:39, 5 May 2022 diff hist +782 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:28 10:28, 5 May 2022 diff hist +3,087 Daivadnya →Traditional history Tag: Reverted
- 10:18 10:18, 5 May 2022 diff hist −3,475 Daivadnya removing content that doesn't fit the paragraph, moving it to history section. Tag: Reverted
- 10:09 10:09, 5 May 2022 diff hist +2 Daivadnya fixing the flow of the paragraph. Tag: Reverted
- 10:06 10:06, 5 May 2022 diff hist 0 Daivadnya grammar correction. Tag: Reverted
- 10:06 10:06, 5 May 2022 diff hist −73 Daivadnya just corrected the grammar Tag: Reverted
- 09:57 09:57, 5 May 2022 diff hist −243 Daivadnya the reference given don't point to saying daivadnya brahmins are subcaste of sonars. Hence removing it. Also the dispute about brahmin status, the citatioins are only for disputes in Maharashtra and hence you can't make a blanket statement disputing their brahmin status in other regions. Tag: Reverted
- 09:51 09:51, 5 May 2022 diff hist +1,091 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:41 08:41, 5 May 2022 diff hist −77 m Daivadnya Removed reference to Rathakars, since it is mentioned without reference. Tag: Reverted
- 08:40 08:40, 5 May 2022 diff hist −19 m Daivadnya Wherever the word Daivadnya appears in any history/gov documents, it is followed by brahmins, i.e., Daivadnya Brahmins. So it is wrong to address them as just Daivadnya Brahmins. It is like coining a new word all together to address a specific community. Tag: Reverted
11 April 2022
- 07:46 07:46, 11 April 2022 diff hist +1,641 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
A user with 23 edits. Account created on 3 April 2022.
24 June 2022
- 18:30 18:30, 24 June 2022 diff hist +822 Talk:Daivadnya →My revert on 14th June: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:20 14:20, 24 June 2022 diff hist +385 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:57 13:57, 24 June 2022 diff hist +321 Talk:Daivadnya →My revert on 14th June: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:46 12:46, 24 June 2022 diff hist −38 Daivadnya Undid revision 1094774378 by Vernekar123 ( talk) Tag: Undo
- 12:45 12:45, 24 June 2022 diff hist +38 Daivadnya Asking for the source, see talk page; will be deleted if source is unreliable/not found. Tag: Reverted
21 June 2022
- 18:21 18:21, 21 June 2022 diff hist +858 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 17:50 17:50, 21 June 2022 diff hist +638 Talk:Daivadnya →My revert on 14th June: new section
- 17:38 17:38, 21 June 2022 diff hist +242 User talk:Vernekar123 →June 2022: Reply Tag: Reply
14 June 2022
- 20:45 20:45, 14 June 2022 diff hist −180 m Daivadnya →Daivajnas and Christianity: There is no citation for Daivadnya brahmins being categorized as Shudras, hence removing the statement. Tag: Reverted
5 May 2022
- 11:19 11:19, 5 May 2022 diff hist +349 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:46 10:46, 5 May 2022 diff hist +428 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:42 10:42, 5 May 2022 diff hist +407 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:39 10:39, 5 May 2022 diff hist +782 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:28 10:28, 5 May 2022 diff hist +3,087 Daivadnya →Traditional history Tag: Reverted
- 10:18 10:18, 5 May 2022 diff hist −3,475 Daivadnya removing content that doesn't fit the paragraph, moving it to history section. Tag: Reverted
- 10:09 10:09, 5 May 2022 diff hist +2 Daivadnya fixing the flow of the paragraph. Tag: Reverted
- 10:06 10:06, 5 May 2022 diff hist 0 Daivadnya grammar correction. Tag: Reverted
- 10:06 10:06, 5 May 2022 diff hist −73 Daivadnya just corrected the grammar Tag: Reverted
- 09:57 09:57, 5 May 2022 diff hist −243 Daivadnya the reference given don't point to saying daivadnya brahmins are subcaste of sonars. Hence removing it. Also the dispute about brahmin status, the citatioins are only for disputes in Maharashtra and hence you can't make a blanket statement disputing their brahmin status in other regions. Tag: Reverted
- 09:51 09:51, 5 May 2022 diff hist +1,091 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:41 08:41, 5 May 2022 diff hist −77 m Daivadnya Removed reference to Rathakars, since it is mentioned without reference. Tag: Reverted
- 08:40 08:40, 5 May 2022 diff hist −19 m Daivadnya Wherever the word Daivadnya appears in any history/gov documents, it is followed by brahmins, i.e., Daivadnya Brahmins. So it is wrong to address them as just Daivadnya Brahmins. It is like coining a new word all together to address a specific community. Tag: Reverted
11 April 2022
- 07:46 07:46, 11 April 2022 diff hist +1,641 Talk:Daivadnya →Brahmin or not Brahmin: Reply Tag: Reply