A user with 146 edits. Account created on 27 June 2015.
8 June 2017
- 13:14 13:14, 8 June 2017 diff hist −1 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Updated for most recent QS ranking
23 September 2016
- 13:12 13:12, 23 September 2016 diff hist −2 Stanford University Combined first and second paragraphs
- 13:12 13:12, 23 September 2016 diff hist +73 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
20 September 2016
19 September 2016
- 23:56 23:56, 19 September 2016 diff hist +49 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 23:55 23:55, 19 September 2016 diff hist +543 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 23:52 23:52, 19 September 2016 diff hist +10 Stanford University Reordered lede for smoother flow.
- 10:34 10:34, 19 September 2016 diff hist +317 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 10:28 10:28, 19 September 2016 diff hist +2 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 10:27 10:27, 19 September 2016 diff hist +135 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 10:23 10:23, 19 September 2016 diff hist +1,688 University of Chicago Changing lede to parallel Harvard and Stanford. Should be done to all "prestigious" universities.
18 September 2016
- 14:21 14:21, 18 September 2016 diff hist +3 Harvard University No edit summary
- 14:21 14:21, 18 September 2016 diff hist −2,548 Harvard University After reading the Talk page, there seems to be no consensus. As editors have pointed out, setting prestige in the lede is not very informative, and sets a bad precedent for other universities to mention prestige by quoting many sources. See WP:BOOSTERISM
- 05:14 05:14, 18 September 2016 diff hist −39 Washington University in St. Louis →Rankings and reputation: Updated US News
- 03:44 03:44, 18 September 2016 diff hist −2,549 Harvard University See WP:BOOSTERISM. Lede does not serve to inform. Rather, it serves to boost this respective university.
- 03:41 03:41, 18 September 2016 diff hist −2,106 Stanford University See WP:BOOSTERISM. Quote from source does not justify inclusion in lede. Serves just to boost the university rather than inform.
16 September 2016
- 22:10 22:10, 16 September 2016 diff hist −2,107 Stanford University Not compatible, see WPPRESTIGE. Harvard should be changed as well, frankly. No other peer institution is labelled as such. Undid revision 739614442 by Rectk ( talk)
13 September 2016
- 19:25 19:25, 13 September 2016 diff hist −1 m Stanford University Formatting changes
- 19:24 19:24, 13 September 2016 diff hist −2,106 Stanford University No institution can convey something as vague as prestige. Almost every peer university page does not have this designation.
4 September 2016
- 02:00 02:00, 4 September 2016 diff hist −746 University of Pennsylvania Paragraph lists essentially all of the departments of the school, calling them all well-known. Very redundant and not cited sufficiently.
- 01:58 01:58, 4 September 2016 diff hist −76 University of Pennsylvania Reference does not prove statement
- 01:56 01:56, 4 September 2016 diff hist +2 University of Chicago Separation for search engine readability
- 01:54 01:54, 4 September 2016 diff hist +12 University of Chicago Undid revision 736723439 by ClueBot NG ( talk) Not vandalism
19 August 2016
- 19:44 19:44, 19 August 2016 diff hist −1 Stanford University No edit summary
- 19:44 19:44, 19 August 2016 diff hist −1,981 Stanford University The word "prestige" has been discussed on numerous other pages with the consensus being that it is used to editorialize articles.
18 May 2016
- 15:33 15:33, 18 May 2016 diff hist +316 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Added Citation to addition
- 15:30 15:30, 18 May 2016 diff hist +18 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings
- 15:30 15:30, 18 May 2016 diff hist +291 University of Chicago Added reference to change
9 February 2016
- 17:42 17:42, 9 February 2016 diff hist +1,708 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 01:43 01:43, 9 February 2016 diff hist +97,851 University of Chicago Citation Relevant
2 January 2016
- 23:15 23:15, 2 January 2016 diff hist +182 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Referencing
- 23:13 23:13, 2 January 2016 diff hist +722 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Referencing
- 03:24 03:24, 2 January 2016 diff hist +10 User talk:Lydhia →University of Chicago
- 03:22 03:22, 2 January 2016 diff hist −1 m University of Chicago removed extraneous period.
- 03:20 03:20, 2 January 2016 diff hist +587 User talk:Lydhia →University of Chicago: new section
- 03:18 03:18, 2 January 2016 diff hist +2,330 University of Chicago Undid revision 697788805 by Lydhia ( talk) - Lydhia keeps removing sourced material. This has precedent, check Stanford Page and El Krevbo editor page.
1 January 2016
- 07:39 07:39, 1 January 2016 diff hist +271 University of Chicago Added citation
- 07:37 07:37, 1 January 2016 diff hist +364 University of Chicago Fleshed out sparse section
- 07:32 07:32, 1 January 2016 diff hist −1 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 07:32 07:32, 1 January 2016 diff hist +1,696 University of Chicago Unjustified removal by Lydhia. Properly sourced, and with precedent. Check the Stanford page. Lydhia seems to be obsessed with cherry picking problems with this particular page.
24 December 2015
- 15:29 15:29, 24 December 2015 diff hist −90 University of Chicago →Associated academic institutions
- 15:28 15:28, 24 December 2015 diff hist +94 University of Chicago →Library system
2 December 2015
- 17:14 17:14, 2 December 2015 diff hist −14 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:13 17:13, 2 December 2015 diff hist −49 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:11 17:11, 2 December 2015 diff hist −12 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:10 17:10, 2 December 2015 diff hist +16 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:09 17:09, 2 December 2015 diff hist +1,156 University of Chicago additions
- 17:05 17:05, 2 December 2015 diff hist +587 University of Chicago Leading concision
26 September 2015
- 13:38 13:38, 26 September 2015 diff hist +1,184 University of Chicago Unexplained removal, seems to be targeting this page specifically. Look at other peer universities' rep section.
24 September 2015
- 18:46 18:46, 24 September 2015 diff hist +1,128 University of Chicago Simplification changes
A user with 146 edits. Account created on 27 June 2015.
8 June 2017
- 13:14 13:14, 8 June 2017 diff hist −1 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Updated for most recent QS ranking
23 September 2016
- 13:12 13:12, 23 September 2016 diff hist −2 Stanford University Combined first and second paragraphs
- 13:12 13:12, 23 September 2016 diff hist +73 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
20 September 2016
19 September 2016
- 23:56 23:56, 19 September 2016 diff hist +49 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 23:55 23:55, 19 September 2016 diff hist +543 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 23:52 23:52, 19 September 2016 diff hist +10 Stanford University Reordered lede for smoother flow.
- 10:34 10:34, 19 September 2016 diff hist +317 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 10:28 10:28, 19 September 2016 diff hist +2 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 10:27 10:27, 19 September 2016 diff hist +135 Talk:Stanford University →Ranking and Status
- 10:23 10:23, 19 September 2016 diff hist +1,688 University of Chicago Changing lede to parallel Harvard and Stanford. Should be done to all "prestigious" universities.
18 September 2016
- 14:21 14:21, 18 September 2016 diff hist +3 Harvard University No edit summary
- 14:21 14:21, 18 September 2016 diff hist −2,548 Harvard University After reading the Talk page, there seems to be no consensus. As editors have pointed out, setting prestige in the lede is not very informative, and sets a bad precedent for other universities to mention prestige by quoting many sources. See WP:BOOSTERISM
- 05:14 05:14, 18 September 2016 diff hist −39 Washington University in St. Louis →Rankings and reputation: Updated US News
- 03:44 03:44, 18 September 2016 diff hist −2,549 Harvard University See WP:BOOSTERISM. Lede does not serve to inform. Rather, it serves to boost this respective university.
- 03:41 03:41, 18 September 2016 diff hist −2,106 Stanford University See WP:BOOSTERISM. Quote from source does not justify inclusion in lede. Serves just to boost the university rather than inform.
16 September 2016
- 22:10 22:10, 16 September 2016 diff hist −2,107 Stanford University Not compatible, see WPPRESTIGE. Harvard should be changed as well, frankly. No other peer institution is labelled as such. Undid revision 739614442 by Rectk ( talk)
13 September 2016
- 19:25 19:25, 13 September 2016 diff hist −1 m Stanford University Formatting changes
- 19:24 19:24, 13 September 2016 diff hist −2,106 Stanford University No institution can convey something as vague as prestige. Almost every peer university page does not have this designation.
4 September 2016
- 02:00 02:00, 4 September 2016 diff hist −746 University of Pennsylvania Paragraph lists essentially all of the departments of the school, calling them all well-known. Very redundant and not cited sufficiently.
- 01:58 01:58, 4 September 2016 diff hist −76 University of Pennsylvania Reference does not prove statement
- 01:56 01:56, 4 September 2016 diff hist +2 University of Chicago Separation for search engine readability
- 01:54 01:54, 4 September 2016 diff hist +12 University of Chicago Undid revision 736723439 by ClueBot NG ( talk) Not vandalism
19 August 2016
- 19:44 19:44, 19 August 2016 diff hist −1 Stanford University No edit summary
- 19:44 19:44, 19 August 2016 diff hist −1,981 Stanford University The word "prestige" has been discussed on numerous other pages with the consensus being that it is used to editorialize articles.
18 May 2016
- 15:33 15:33, 18 May 2016 diff hist +316 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Added Citation to addition
- 15:30 15:30, 18 May 2016 diff hist +18 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings
- 15:30 15:30, 18 May 2016 diff hist +291 University of Chicago Added reference to change
9 February 2016
- 17:42 17:42, 9 February 2016 diff hist +1,708 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 01:43 01:43, 9 February 2016 diff hist +97,851 University of Chicago Citation Relevant
2 January 2016
- 23:15 23:15, 2 January 2016 diff hist +182 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Referencing
- 23:13 23:13, 2 January 2016 diff hist +722 University of Chicago →Reputation and rankings: Referencing
- 03:24 03:24, 2 January 2016 diff hist +10 User talk:Lydhia →University of Chicago
- 03:22 03:22, 2 January 2016 diff hist −1 m University of Chicago removed extraneous period.
- 03:20 03:20, 2 January 2016 diff hist +587 User talk:Lydhia →University of Chicago: new section
- 03:18 03:18, 2 January 2016 diff hist +2,330 University of Chicago Undid revision 697788805 by Lydhia ( talk) - Lydhia keeps removing sourced material. This has precedent, check Stanford Page and El Krevbo editor page.
1 January 2016
- 07:39 07:39, 1 January 2016 diff hist +271 University of Chicago Added citation
- 07:37 07:37, 1 January 2016 diff hist +364 University of Chicago Fleshed out sparse section
- 07:32 07:32, 1 January 2016 diff hist −1 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 07:32 07:32, 1 January 2016 diff hist +1,696 University of Chicago Unjustified removal by Lydhia. Properly sourced, and with precedent. Check the Stanford page. Lydhia seems to be obsessed with cherry picking problems with this particular page.
24 December 2015
- 15:29 15:29, 24 December 2015 diff hist −90 University of Chicago →Associated academic institutions
- 15:28 15:28, 24 December 2015 diff hist +94 University of Chicago →Library system
2 December 2015
- 17:14 17:14, 2 December 2015 diff hist −14 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:13 17:13, 2 December 2015 diff hist −49 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:11 17:11, 2 December 2015 diff hist −12 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:10 17:10, 2 December 2015 diff hist +16 University of Chicago No edit summary
- 17:09 17:09, 2 December 2015 diff hist +1,156 University of Chicago additions
- 17:05 17:05, 2 December 2015 diff hist +587 University of Chicago Leading concision
26 September 2015
- 13:38 13:38, 26 September 2015 diff hist +1,184 University of Chicago Unexplained removal, seems to be targeting this page specifically. Look at other peer universities' rep section.
24 September 2015
- 18:46 18:46, 24 September 2015 diff hist +1,128 University of Chicago Simplification changes