08:5508:55, 19 July 2022diffhist+193
Beast Man
I tidied up some of the facts surrounding the "Fighting Foe Men" concept story by Don Glut. This was not the original idea of the character line up, but an early pre-mini-comics story created by him. I added a reference for the prototype "Tree Man" name.
21:0721:07, 31 December 2018diffhist−95,440
m
White privilege
←Replaced content with '== The myth of "White privilege" == The cultural Marxist myth of "White privilege" was shown for the nonsense it is, when America elected it's first Preside...'Tag: Replaced
06:4206:42, 4 November 2018diffhist−4
Alt-right
Undid revision 867080993 by
Serial Number 54129 (
talk) Yes, it changes the sense of it. It makes it a neutral statement rather than a biased one. Wether or not it's a "false" equivalence is a matter of opinion, not fact. If you use the smear "Alt left" then you possibly believe in the equivalence you are making between the far left and far right, in terms of political violence.Tag: Undo
3 November 2018
14:4114:41, 3 November 2018diffhist−4
Alt-right
I removed the first instance of "false" to keep the page politically neutral. It is a matter of opinion as to whether or not a smear is false or true. I put quotation marks round the second "false equivalence", as it is an attributed quote.
10:2310:23, 2 November 2018diffhist+4
m
Alt-right
"False equivalence" should be in quotation marks. The term "Alt-left" is used conservatives and the far-right, to smear their opponents - progressives and the far-left, by implying that they're equivalent to the "Alt-right" in terms of violence. Whether or not you agree with this implied equivalence between the far-right and far-left, is a matter of opinion. In this case, it's the quoted opinion of Mark Pitcavage. Thus his opinion should be in quotation marks, to keep this all neutral.
30 October 2018
07:4007:40, 30 October 2018diffhist−14
m
Alt-right
The term "Alt-left" does not imply a "False equivalence" to the Alt-right. It implies an ACTUAL equivalence...which is why the term was being used. You may think it is "false" to claim such an equivalence, but the use of the term "Alt-left" does not intend it to be false. It's an smear term for violent leftist groups, implying they are equally violent to the Alt-right eg. "violence on many sides".
02:3802:38, 26 June 2018diffhist−1
Pliosauroidea
I removed false information about Pliosaurs being "distant cousins of turtles". While this is sort of true, they were less related to turtles than dinosaurs were. Genetic evidence now shows that Turtles were from a branch of Archelosauria, and not ancestral to sauropterygian swimming reptiles, such as plesiosaurs and pliosaurs.
08:5508:55, 19 July 2022diffhist+193
Beast Man
I tidied up some of the facts surrounding the "Fighting Foe Men" concept story by Don Glut. This was not the original idea of the character line up, but an early pre-mini-comics story created by him. I added a reference for the prototype "Tree Man" name.
21:0721:07, 31 December 2018diffhist−95,440
m
White privilege
←Replaced content with '== The myth of "White privilege" == The cultural Marxist myth of "White privilege" was shown for the nonsense it is, when America elected it's first Preside...'Tag: Replaced
06:4206:42, 4 November 2018diffhist−4
Alt-right
Undid revision 867080993 by
Serial Number 54129 (
talk) Yes, it changes the sense of it. It makes it a neutral statement rather than a biased one. Wether or not it's a "false" equivalence is a matter of opinion, not fact. If you use the smear "Alt left" then you possibly believe in the equivalence you are making between the far left and far right, in terms of political violence.Tag: Undo
3 November 2018
14:4114:41, 3 November 2018diffhist−4
Alt-right
I removed the first instance of "false" to keep the page politically neutral. It is a matter of opinion as to whether or not a smear is false or true. I put quotation marks round the second "false equivalence", as it is an attributed quote.
10:2310:23, 2 November 2018diffhist+4
m
Alt-right
"False equivalence" should be in quotation marks. The term "Alt-left" is used conservatives and the far-right, to smear their opponents - progressives and the far-left, by implying that they're equivalent to the "Alt-right" in terms of violence. Whether or not you agree with this implied equivalence between the far-right and far-left, is a matter of opinion. In this case, it's the quoted opinion of Mark Pitcavage. Thus his opinion should be in quotation marks, to keep this all neutral.
30 October 2018
07:4007:40, 30 October 2018diffhist−14
m
Alt-right
The term "Alt-left" does not imply a "False equivalence" to the Alt-right. It implies an ACTUAL equivalence...which is why the term was being used. You may think it is "false" to claim such an equivalence, but the use of the term "Alt-left" does not intend it to be false. It's an smear term for violent leftist groups, implying they are equally violent to the Alt-right eg. "violence on many sides".
02:3802:38, 26 June 2018diffhist−1
Pliosauroidea
I removed false information about Pliosaurs being "distant cousins of turtles". While this is sort of true, they were less related to turtles than dinosaurs were. Genetic evidence now shows that Turtles were from a branch of Archelosauria, and not ancestral to sauropterygian swimming reptiles, such as plesiosaurs and pliosaurs.