17:4917:49, 23 September 2013diffhist+20
Human genetic variation
Your stated reason is demonstrable nonsense. Edwards' "Fallacy" is *directly* relevant to the very preceding sentence that compares intra- and inter-group variations, which is misleading due to false implication that variations are uncorrelated.
17:4817:48, 23 September 2013diffhist+240
Human genetic variation
Your stated reason is demonstrable nonsense. Edwards' "Fallacy" is *directly* relevant to the very preceding sentence that compares intra- and inter-group variations, which is misleading due to false implication that variations are uncorrelated.
17:0617:06, 13 September 2013diffhist−1,142
User:Carwil/Human genetic clustering
Roberts is trained in law and her opinion does not make for a reliable source on genetics. Pointing out she's a law prof is an important disclaimer. But saying she "refuted the claim of Edwards", an actual geneticist, is nonsense and was removed.
17:4917:49, 23 September 2013diffhist+20
Human genetic variation
Your stated reason is demonstrable nonsense. Edwards' "Fallacy" is *directly* relevant to the very preceding sentence that compares intra- and inter-group variations, which is misleading due to false implication that variations are uncorrelated.
17:4817:48, 23 September 2013diffhist+240
Human genetic variation
Your stated reason is demonstrable nonsense. Edwards' "Fallacy" is *directly* relevant to the very preceding sentence that compares intra- and inter-group variations, which is misleading due to false implication that variations are uncorrelated.
17:0617:06, 13 September 2013diffhist−1,142
User:Carwil/Human genetic clustering
Roberts is trained in law and her opinion does not make for a reliable source on genetics. Pointing out she's a law prof is an important disclaimer. But saying she "refuted the claim of Edwards", an actual geneticist, is nonsense and was removed.