19:0819:08, 4 July 2021diffhist+526
Talk:Graham Hancock
Added citations to prove arguments that Hancock is not an”pseudo” anything, rather a reporter on fringe-peer reviewed academic theories. (It’s as if the whole of Wikipedia policy resists differing views in the same way as academia does).Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
19:2719:27, 2 July 2021diffhist−108
Pseudoarchaeology
removing Hancock as a wikipedia poster child for pseudoscience, see the highly contested Talk page on Graham Hancock.Tag: Reverted
19:2319:23, 2 July 2021diffhist+278
Pseudoarchaeology
Hancock is again being used as a straw man fallacy and a poster child on Wikipedia for any "Pseudo" science. Hancock is very nuanced in his language, never making claims, only suggestions based on peer-reviewed data.Tag: Reverted
19:0819:08, 4 July 2021diffhist+526
Talk:Graham Hancock
Added citations to prove arguments that Hancock is not an”pseudo” anything, rather a reporter on fringe-peer reviewed academic theories. (It’s as if the whole of Wikipedia policy resists differing views in the same way as academia does).Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
19:2719:27, 2 July 2021diffhist−108
Pseudoarchaeology
removing Hancock as a wikipedia poster child for pseudoscience, see the highly contested Talk page on Graham Hancock.Tag: Reverted
19:2319:23, 2 July 2021diffhist+278
Pseudoarchaeology
Hancock is again being used as a straw man fallacy and a poster child on Wikipedia for any "Pseudo" science. Hancock is very nuanced in his language, never making claims, only suggestions based on peer-reviewed data.Tag: Reverted