A user with 135 edits. Account created on 4 November 2007.
21 November 2020
- 07:09 07:09, 21 November 2020 diff hist +1 Ignaz Semmelweis No edit summary
- 07:07 07:07, 21 November 2020 diff hist +267 Ignaz Semmelweis The general civil code of the Austrian Empire stipulated citizenship based on the municipality, there was no Hungarian or Austrian citizenship until the dual Monarchry in 1867. He was from an ethnic German family.
- 06:58 06:58, 21 November 2020 diff hist +570 Talk:Ignaz Semmelweis →Nationality: This section glosses over the citizenship laws in existance at the time of the Austrian Empire when Semmelweis was born.
28 March 2020
- 21:10 21:10, 28 March 2020 diff hist +120 m Julius Edgar Lilienfeld He was born an austro-hungarian and held that citizenship until its dissolution in September 1919 at Saint Germain-en-Laye. This is not up for discussion and should be reflected along with his US and possible Polish citizenship. He also was a native german speaker of Lemberg~~~~
19 September 2018
- 20:05 20:05, 19 September 2018 diff hist +142 Ignacy Łukasiewicz Undid revision 860141576 by Dlohcierekim ( talk) Austrian Poland was not an administrative name for the region it was the crown lands of Galicia and Lodomeria within the Austrian Empire. The article has been changed to reflect this. Also the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth was partitioned 3 times, not Poland which was created when it fought for its independence after ww1. Nationality is tricky see talk. Tag: Undo
- 19:54 19:54, 19 September 2018 diff hist +1,204 Talk:Ignacy Łukasiewicz →Nationality, Regional Names and Ethnicity: new section
19 July 2012
- 12:34 12:34, 19 July 2012 diff hist +1,822 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 12:24 12:24, 19 July 2012 diff hist +855 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Morale
10 July 2012
- 13:34 13:34, 10 July 2012 diff hist −12 m Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 13:33 13:33, 10 July 2012 diff hist +1,198 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
8 July 2012
- 23:56 23:56, 8 July 2012 diff hist +306 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 18:47 18:47, 8 July 2012 diff hist −4 Talk:T-34 →Combat history
- 18:38 18:38, 8 July 2012 diff hist +159 User talk:Tempsperdue →T-34
- 18:36 18:36, 8 July 2012 diff hist −170 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): removed conjecture, see talk combat operation section for more info.
- 18:34 18:34, 8 July 2012 diff hist +328 Talk:T-34 →Combat history
- 18:29 18:29, 8 July 2012 diff hist +162 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 15:27 15:27, 8 July 2012 diff hist +2 m T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): punctuation and spelling
- 15:24 15:24, 8 July 2012 diff hist −143 m T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943)
- 15:21 15:21, 8 July 2012 diff hist +962 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): Re-added section that REFERS TO THE TABLE and PREVIOUS referenced and draws directly from it, while removing opinion
- 15:05 15:05, 8 July 2012 diff hist −64 m Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 14:58 14:58, 8 July 2012 diff hist +58 Zirkus Rosarius →Known captured aircraft
- 14:50 14:50, 8 July 2012 diff hist +7 m Hawker Typhoon →Switch to ground attack: syntax and punctuation
- 14:46 14:46, 8 July 2012 diff hist +410 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
- 14:40 14:40, 8 July 2012 diff hist +18 m Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 14:38 14:38, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,483 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 14:34 14:34, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,058 Hawker Typhoon →Switch to ground attack: Re-added overall Normandy campaign aircraft losses as it puts the losses of AFVs and Typhoons during that campaign IN PERSPECTIVE. Please stop removing it.
- 14:28 14:28, 8 July 2012 diff hist +95 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
- 14:27 14:27, 8 July 2012 diff hist +554 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
- 02:33 02:33, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,798 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 02:30 02:30, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,735 User talk:Minorhistorian →Hawker Typhoon: new section
- 02:22 02:22, 8 July 2012 diff hist +471 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
7 July 2012
- 23:51 23:51, 7 July 2012 diff hist +93 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: I edited the line to be more true to the reference while reinforcing the point
- 23:48 23:48, 7 July 2012 diff hist +9 T-34 →Conclusions: removed confusion
- 23:46 23:46, 7 July 2012 diff hist +16 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: This quote should be removed as pilot kill claims are generally inflated OR include all vehicles not just tanks...is there any other verifiable reference to the effectivness of the PTAB??
- 23:42 23:42, 7 July 2012 diff hist +489 Talk:Ilyushin Il-2 →Controversial Soviet claims of effectiveness
- 23:35 23:35, 7 July 2012 diff hist +61 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: the wholw point of this part of the sentence is to refute the unverified claim of 70 tanks killed in 20mins if a majority are intact several months later!
- 23:28 23:28, 7 July 2012 diff hist +3,947 T-34 →Early war combat assessment: Added a bunch of references from the Aberdeen proving ground regarding various aspects of the T-34 design
- 22:22 22:22, 7 July 2012 diff hist +195 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: syntax and valididy of soviet kill claims
- 22:16 22:16, 7 July 2012 diff hist +62 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: the fact that the majority of the 9th panzer division's were still operational is important as it gives lie to the fact that the Il-2 destroyed over 70 on a single day. Also why get rid of th battalion names?
- 22:10 22:10, 7 July 2012 diff hist +237 T-34 →Operational history: moved discussion of T-34 1941 losses to 1941 combat section from the combat assessment section
- 21:45 21:45, 7 July 2012 diff hist +24 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): Added link to wiki article on pak 36
- 21:41 21:41, 7 July 2012 diff hist +49 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): The 44% comes from taking 6,600 T-34s out of 15,100 total losses, so it is important to have the total AFVs lost referenced!
- 21:35 21:35, 7 July 2012 diff hist +1,076 Hawker Typhoon Undid revision 501145855 by Bzuk ( talk) I do unerstand what you are saying but the rest of that paragraph is unreferenced theory as well, the ammo capacity and attack angle can be referenced...I
- 21:26 21:26, 7 July 2012 diff hist +24 T-34 The Aberdeen proving ground study of the T-34s optics does not say foreign, it says existing tanks or under-development
- 21:21 21:21, 7 July 2012 diff hist +1,075 T-34 →Conclusions: Re-added the numbers of T-34s lost W.R.T German AFVs lost to help explain the T-34s questionble tactical level but impressive strategic level performance
- 21:13 21:13, 7 July 2012 diff hist +39 T-34 →Introduction of T-34-85 and combat assessement (1944-1945): punctuation
- 21:10 21:10, 7 July 2012 diff hist +909 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): re-added a caution on the table and the fact that the T-34 was relatively impenetratble from the front.
- 20:21 20:21, 7 July 2012 diff hist +120 T-34 →Early war combat assessment: Re-added the gun sights that were used with the F-34 and edited some punctuation.
- 20:06 20:06, 7 July 2012 diff hist +2,382 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: All the information that was added was sourced. HOW IS IT POV?
- 20:01 20:01, 7 July 2012 diff hist +1,076 Hawker Typhoon →Switch to ground attack: Re- added the bit on angle of attack. I would have to remember the source but the argument is valid and supports why only 4% of AFVs in Normandy were air kills!
A user with 135 edits. Account created on 4 November 2007.
21 November 2020
- 07:09 07:09, 21 November 2020 diff hist +1 Ignaz Semmelweis No edit summary
- 07:07 07:07, 21 November 2020 diff hist +267 Ignaz Semmelweis The general civil code of the Austrian Empire stipulated citizenship based on the municipality, there was no Hungarian or Austrian citizenship until the dual Monarchry in 1867. He was from an ethnic German family.
- 06:58 06:58, 21 November 2020 diff hist +570 Talk:Ignaz Semmelweis →Nationality: This section glosses over the citizenship laws in existance at the time of the Austrian Empire when Semmelweis was born.
28 March 2020
- 21:10 21:10, 28 March 2020 diff hist +120 m Julius Edgar Lilienfeld He was born an austro-hungarian and held that citizenship until its dissolution in September 1919 at Saint Germain-en-Laye. This is not up for discussion and should be reflected along with his US and possible Polish citizenship. He also was a native german speaker of Lemberg~~~~
19 September 2018
- 20:05 20:05, 19 September 2018 diff hist +142 Ignacy Łukasiewicz Undid revision 860141576 by Dlohcierekim ( talk) Austrian Poland was not an administrative name for the region it was the crown lands of Galicia and Lodomeria within the Austrian Empire. The article has been changed to reflect this. Also the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth was partitioned 3 times, not Poland which was created when it fought for its independence after ww1. Nationality is tricky see talk. Tag: Undo
- 19:54 19:54, 19 September 2018 diff hist +1,204 Talk:Ignacy Łukasiewicz →Nationality, Regional Names and Ethnicity: new section
19 July 2012
- 12:34 12:34, 19 July 2012 diff hist +1,822 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 12:24 12:24, 19 July 2012 diff hist +855 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Morale
10 July 2012
- 13:34 13:34, 10 July 2012 diff hist −12 m Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 13:33 13:33, 10 July 2012 diff hist +1,198 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
8 July 2012
- 23:56 23:56, 8 July 2012 diff hist +306 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 18:47 18:47, 8 July 2012 diff hist −4 Talk:T-34 →Combat history
- 18:38 18:38, 8 July 2012 diff hist +159 User talk:Tempsperdue →T-34
- 18:36 18:36, 8 July 2012 diff hist −170 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): removed conjecture, see talk combat operation section for more info.
- 18:34 18:34, 8 July 2012 diff hist +328 Talk:T-34 →Combat history
- 18:29 18:29, 8 July 2012 diff hist +162 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 15:27 15:27, 8 July 2012 diff hist +2 m T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): punctuation and spelling
- 15:24 15:24, 8 July 2012 diff hist −143 m T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943)
- 15:21 15:21, 8 July 2012 diff hist +962 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): Re-added section that REFERS TO THE TABLE and PREVIOUS referenced and draws directly from it, while removing opinion
- 15:05 15:05, 8 July 2012 diff hist −64 m Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 14:58 14:58, 8 July 2012 diff hist +58 Zirkus Rosarius →Known captured aircraft
- 14:50 14:50, 8 July 2012 diff hist +7 m Hawker Typhoon →Switch to ground attack: syntax and punctuation
- 14:46 14:46, 8 July 2012 diff hist +410 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
- 14:40 14:40, 8 July 2012 diff hist +18 m Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 14:38 14:38, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,483 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 14:34 14:34, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,058 Hawker Typhoon →Switch to ground attack: Re-added overall Normandy campaign aircraft losses as it puts the losses of AFVs and Typhoons during that campaign IN PERSPECTIVE. Please stop removing it.
- 14:28 14:28, 8 July 2012 diff hist +95 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
- 14:27 14:27, 8 July 2012 diff hist +554 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
- 02:33 02:33, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,798 Talk:Hawker Typhoon →Switch to Ground Attack
- 02:30 02:30, 8 July 2012 diff hist +1,735 User talk:Minorhistorian →Hawker Typhoon: new section
- 02:22 02:22, 8 July 2012 diff hist +471 User talk:Tempsperdue →Hawker Typhoon
7 July 2012
- 23:51 23:51, 7 July 2012 diff hist +93 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: I edited the line to be more true to the reference while reinforcing the point
- 23:48 23:48, 7 July 2012 diff hist +9 T-34 →Conclusions: removed confusion
- 23:46 23:46, 7 July 2012 diff hist +16 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: This quote should be removed as pilot kill claims are generally inflated OR include all vehicles not just tanks...is there any other verifiable reference to the effectivness of the PTAB??
- 23:42 23:42, 7 July 2012 diff hist +489 Talk:Ilyushin Il-2 →Controversial Soviet claims of effectiveness
- 23:35 23:35, 7 July 2012 diff hist +61 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: the wholw point of this part of the sentence is to refute the unverified claim of 70 tanks killed in 20mins if a majority are intact several months later!
- 23:28 23:28, 7 July 2012 diff hist +3,947 T-34 →Early war combat assessment: Added a bunch of references from the Aberdeen proving ground regarding various aspects of the T-34 design
- 22:22 22:22, 7 July 2012 diff hist +195 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: syntax and valididy of soviet kill claims
- 22:16 22:16, 7 July 2012 diff hist +62 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: the fact that the majority of the 9th panzer division's were still operational is important as it gives lie to the fact that the Il-2 destroyed over 70 on a single day. Also why get rid of th battalion names?
- 22:10 22:10, 7 July 2012 diff hist +237 T-34 →Operational history: moved discussion of T-34 1941 losses to 1941 combat section from the combat assessment section
- 21:45 21:45, 7 July 2012 diff hist +24 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): Added link to wiki article on pak 36
- 21:41 21:41, 7 July 2012 diff hist +49 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): The 44% comes from taking 6,600 T-34s out of 15,100 total losses, so it is important to have the total AFVs lost referenced!
- 21:35 21:35, 7 July 2012 diff hist +1,076 Hawker Typhoon Undid revision 501145855 by Bzuk ( talk) I do unerstand what you are saying but the rest of that paragraph is unreferenced theory as well, the ammo capacity and attack angle can be referenced...I
- 21:26 21:26, 7 July 2012 diff hist +24 T-34 The Aberdeen proving ground study of the T-34s optics does not say foreign, it says existing tanks or under-development
- 21:21 21:21, 7 July 2012 diff hist +1,075 T-34 →Conclusions: Re-added the numbers of T-34s lost W.R.T German AFVs lost to help explain the T-34s questionble tactical level but impressive strategic level performance
- 21:13 21:13, 7 July 2012 diff hist +39 T-34 →Introduction of T-34-85 and combat assessement (1944-1945): punctuation
- 21:10 21:10, 7 July 2012 diff hist +909 T-34 →Further combat assessment (1942–1943): re-added a caution on the table and the fact that the T-34 was relatively impenetratble from the front.
- 20:21 20:21, 7 July 2012 diff hist +120 T-34 →Early war combat assessment: Re-added the gun sights that were used with the F-34 and edited some punctuation.
- 20:06 20:06, 7 July 2012 diff hist +2,382 Ilyushin Il-2 →Effectiveness as attack plane: All the information that was added was sourced. HOW IS IT POV?
- 20:01 20:01, 7 July 2012 diff hist +1,076 Hawker Typhoon →Switch to ground attack: Re- added the bit on angle of attack. I would have to remember the source but the argument is valid and supports why only 4% of AFVs in Normandy were air kills!