22:1022:10, 12 June 2024diffhist+13
Sovereign citizen movement
already mocked the concept of "federal corporation" above, no need to this twice, the idea is that they renounce to a citizenship relationship with that entity, regardless of what they call it, it is the same entity as percieved by the state and the natural person.Tag: Reverted
19:2219:22, 12 June 2024diffhist+6
Sovereign citizen movement
Not deep into the subject, but I'm getting a ridiculously blatant non NPOV vibe here. Anyways, citation needs to be right next to a litigious claim such as this one. Also this would deserve an in article section if possible.Tag: Reverted
08:0308:03, 12 June 2024diffhist+34
Solfège
→Origin: This may look like a NPOV issue, but consider what the references say! I'm aligning and giving due weight to what the 4 references say, not taking the POV of the counter-reference .
19:4419:44, 24 July 2023diffhist+38
Telephone call recording laws
Direct citation to a law is not very helpful, we need a professional to interpret the law, or at the very least a quote, either inline or in the footnotes, that is so clear that no secondary source is needed.
21:0221:02, 31 July 2022diffhist+24
Web page
Main ref is: tertiary, non-specialized, prone to circular reporting, of dubious quality, a dictionary. We need better sources.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
22:1022:10, 12 June 2024diffhist+13
Sovereign citizen movement
already mocked the concept of "federal corporation" above, no need to this twice, the idea is that they renounce to a citizenship relationship with that entity, regardless of what they call it, it is the same entity as percieved by the state and the natural person.Tag: Reverted
19:2219:22, 12 June 2024diffhist+6
Sovereign citizen movement
Not deep into the subject, but I'm getting a ridiculously blatant non NPOV vibe here. Anyways, citation needs to be right next to a litigious claim such as this one. Also this would deserve an in article section if possible.Tag: Reverted
08:0308:03, 12 June 2024diffhist+34
Solfège
→Origin: This may look like a NPOV issue, but consider what the references say! I'm aligning and giving due weight to what the 4 references say, not taking the POV of the counter-reference .
19:4419:44, 24 July 2023diffhist+38
Telephone call recording laws
Direct citation to a law is not very helpful, we need a professional to interpret the law, or at the very least a quote, either inline or in the footnotes, that is so clear that no secondary source is needed.
21:0221:02, 31 July 2022diffhist+24
Web page
Main ref is: tertiary, non-specialized, prone to circular reporting, of dubious quality, a dictionary. We need better sources.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit