16:4516:45, 18 October 2012diffhist−84
Treaty of Trianon
rm., 'defined its borders' is enough here, lead should be concise; the League of Nations sentence is also a bit superfluous here
16:4016:40, 18 October 2012diffhist−210
Treaty of Trianon
the lead is already too long and this doesn't belong there; probably should be inserted into one of the 'Consequences' paragraphs
16:4716:47, 10 March 2012diffhist+5
Hungarian–Romanian War
add inline citations preferably here, the lead is only meant to be a summary of the article; however, if no source is provided within a reasonable amount of time, it can be removed, I know the rule
16:3216:32, 10 March 2012diffhist+1,175
Hungarian–Romanian War
rv.; neither you, nor banned editor
User:Iaaasi will cherry pick which unreferenced parts you'll throw out from whole unreferenced sections; see talk page, either the whole stuff goes and we only keep ref'd parts, or we'll slow down...
17:3317:33, 9 March 2012diffhist−89
Hungarian–Romanian War
rm. second part of the sentence, it was about the Hungarians, not the Entente; however, we don't need a "citation needed" tag, this is only a summary of a well-referenced section
16:1316:13, 8 March 2012diffhist−58
Hungarian–Romanian War
I'm against mentioning it, because we don't cover in the lead in detail the many things the Rom. did AGAINST the will of the Entente...
16:4516:45, 18 October 2012diffhist−84
Treaty of Trianon
rm., 'defined its borders' is enough here, lead should be concise; the League of Nations sentence is also a bit superfluous here
16:4016:40, 18 October 2012diffhist−210
Treaty of Trianon
the lead is already too long and this doesn't belong there; probably should be inserted into one of the 'Consequences' paragraphs
16:4716:47, 10 March 2012diffhist+5
Hungarian–Romanian War
add inline citations preferably here, the lead is only meant to be a summary of the article; however, if no source is provided within a reasonable amount of time, it can be removed, I know the rule
16:3216:32, 10 March 2012diffhist+1,175
Hungarian–Romanian War
rv.; neither you, nor banned editor
User:Iaaasi will cherry pick which unreferenced parts you'll throw out from whole unreferenced sections; see talk page, either the whole stuff goes and we only keep ref'd parts, or we'll slow down...
17:3317:33, 9 March 2012diffhist−89
Hungarian–Romanian War
rm. second part of the sentence, it was about the Hungarians, not the Entente; however, we don't need a "citation needed" tag, this is only a summary of a well-referenced section
16:1316:13, 8 March 2012diffhist−58
Hungarian–Romanian War
I'm against mentioning it, because we don't cover in the lead in detail the many things the Rom. did AGAINST the will of the Entente...