01:1401:14, 16 November 2021diffhist−1,275
Mark Willacy
→Criticism over Afghanistan journalism: The sources used in this section are not relevant. The letter published by Veteran Support Force was written by a solider who was not present nor associated with the alleged war crimes described by Willacy. None of the soldiers involved have criticised the allegations or the incidents exposed by Rogue Forces. The statement is factually incorrect. Rouge Forces documents the alleged crimes by the SAS. These sources describe other, unrelated units.Tag: Manual revert
30 August 2021
00:4800:48, 30 August 2021diffhist−892
Mark Willacy
→Writing career: This insertion is incorrect and inaccurately referenced. The citations used in this statement did not directly challenge the veracity of the book's claims. The book was published by a reputable publishing firm who confirmed the veracity of its claims.
10:0910:09, 24 September 2020diffhist+1,541
Paul Pisasale
Updated to reflect Paul Pisasale's recent guilty plea of a series of serious criminal charges, citing major news sources.
22:0222:02, 16 September 2019diffhist+1,421
Paul Pisasale
Undid revision 916071075 by
Kerry Raymond (
talk) My edits did not claim he did these acts, only that he was charged. The edits are not libelous as they are facts which have been appropriately referenced. Added additional references to support the edits.Tag: Undo
01:1401:14, 16 November 2021diffhist−1,275
Mark Willacy
→Criticism over Afghanistan journalism: The sources used in this section are not relevant. The letter published by Veteran Support Force was written by a solider who was not present nor associated with the alleged war crimes described by Willacy. None of the soldiers involved have criticised the allegations or the incidents exposed by Rogue Forces. The statement is factually incorrect. Rouge Forces documents the alleged crimes by the SAS. These sources describe other, unrelated units.Tag: Manual revert
30 August 2021
00:4800:48, 30 August 2021diffhist−892
Mark Willacy
→Writing career: This insertion is incorrect and inaccurately referenced. The citations used in this statement did not directly challenge the veracity of the book's claims. The book was published by a reputable publishing firm who confirmed the veracity of its claims.
10:0910:09, 24 September 2020diffhist+1,541
Paul Pisasale
Updated to reflect Paul Pisasale's recent guilty plea of a series of serious criminal charges, citing major news sources.
22:0222:02, 16 September 2019diffhist+1,421
Paul Pisasale
Undid revision 916071075 by
Kerry Raymond (
talk) My edits did not claim he did these acts, only that he was charged. The edits are not libelous as they are facts which have been appropriately referenced. Added additional references to support the edits.Tag: Undo