22:5522:55, 24 October 2023diffhist+166
Lucy Letby
Saying that Letby was "next" to the incubator when the source used "near" raises NPOV problems. And fine let's keep to the direct quotes, considering the mother was a witness for a prosecution case that was ultimately officially backed by the jury
21:2721:27, 22 October 2023diffhist+64
Lucy Letby
saying she "removed" the documents is insufficient, it implies that this was permissible anyway and insignificant, when it was strictly forbidden to do so and it was this very reason why it formed one of the main pieces of evidence against her
15:3915:39, 29 September 2023diffhist−129
Lucy Letby
I am disputing the inclusion of this sentence, it makes it sound like all statisticians believe this. With the onus on you to justify this content’s inclusion, I will open a talk page discussion
22 September 2023
17:1617:16, 22 September 2023diffhist−684
Lucy Letby
There is no consensus for the inclusion of this - see the talk discussion. The only reason I haven’t removed it again before is to avoid edit warring
09:5309:53, 16 September 2023diffhist−686
Lucy Letby
Talk:Lucy Letby#Sarrita Adams. In any case, it should be removed while discussed - or at least the part just added which is literally about an involved editor (I have kept the other parts as they seem to be the consensus version)Tag: Reverted
22:5522:55, 24 October 2023diffhist+166
Lucy Letby
Saying that Letby was "next" to the incubator when the source used "near" raises NPOV problems. And fine let's keep to the direct quotes, considering the mother was a witness for a prosecution case that was ultimately officially backed by the jury
21:2721:27, 22 October 2023diffhist+64
Lucy Letby
saying she "removed" the documents is insufficient, it implies that this was permissible anyway and insignificant, when it was strictly forbidden to do so and it was this very reason why it formed one of the main pieces of evidence against her
15:3915:39, 29 September 2023diffhist−129
Lucy Letby
I am disputing the inclusion of this sentence, it makes it sound like all statisticians believe this. With the onus on you to justify this content’s inclusion, I will open a talk page discussion
22 September 2023
17:1617:16, 22 September 2023diffhist−684
Lucy Letby
There is no consensus for the inclusion of this - see the talk discussion. The only reason I haven’t removed it again before is to avoid edit warring
09:5309:53, 16 September 2023diffhist−686
Lucy Letby
Talk:Lucy Letby#Sarrita Adams. In any case, it should be removed while discussed - or at least the part just added which is literally about an involved editor (I have kept the other parts as they seem to be the consensus version)Tag: Reverted