23:4223:42, 27 October 2023diffhist−706
Frenzal Rhomb
The "controversy" section is completely unsubstantiated. No references. Arguably, outrught slanderous.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:1800:18, 31 August 2022diffhist−40
John Joseph (singer)
Removed "COVID/Anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist" from the first sentence of his biography. This is not why John is a notable person. He's much more known for his animal rights activism than his opinion on COVID-19.Tag: Manual revert
22:4622:46, 31 May 2022diffhist−409
Puyi
The sentence about Nicholas II is terribly misleading. There's absolutely nothing mentioned in the book, The Last Emperor, about Mao "often" making references to Nicholas II. There is no proof (particularly not in this book) that Lenin ever even thought about, much less attempted, making the last tsar into a communist.
02:0402:04, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
m
2020 United States presidential election
The consensus is that the majority of both Democrats and Republicans are unsatisfied with the nominees. The people want a third candidate. You don't have to agree with Jo Jorgensen. Censoring this information is only indicative of personal bias. It does not cause harm to keep Jo in the Infobox.
01:5601:56, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
2020 United States presidential election
"only real chance"??? That's a lie. The U.S. electorate is overwhelmingly unsatisfied with Biden and Trump. The electorate is looking for someone else. Why prevent the electorate from seeing and knowing who the three major candidates are? That's censorship. That goes against the principles of Wikipedia. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-trump-losing-among-voters-who-dont-like-him-or-biden/
01:4001:40, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
m
2020 United States presidential election
There was no "consensus." There was one or two people with an agenda. There are more than two people running for this position. Jo Jorgensen is a major candidate from a major, established party. She deserves to be in the info box, as do other candidates. Stop perpetuating the failed two-party system.
01:2101:21, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
m
2020 United States presidential election
"US elections are, sadly, a very "black and white" (or, in this case "blue and red") affair" - No, they are not. There is another popular, competent person running for this office. Wikipedia is a massive influencer. We, as a community, cannot allow other candidates to be censored and silenced just because that's the way it's been in the past. It's unacceptable.
13:1213:12, 18 February 2019diffhist+6
6ix9ine
Snitch9ine is what he'll ever be remembered as. I'm sorry. I know this does't fit his narrative, but it's simply fact. Google and Twitter the term. Better sooner than later.
23:4223:42, 27 October 2023diffhist−706
Frenzal Rhomb
The "controversy" section is completely unsubstantiated. No references. Arguably, outrught slanderous.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:1800:18, 31 August 2022diffhist−40
John Joseph (singer)
Removed "COVID/Anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist" from the first sentence of his biography. This is not why John is a notable person. He's much more known for his animal rights activism than his opinion on COVID-19.Tag: Manual revert
22:4622:46, 31 May 2022diffhist−409
Puyi
The sentence about Nicholas II is terribly misleading. There's absolutely nothing mentioned in the book, The Last Emperor, about Mao "often" making references to Nicholas II. There is no proof (particularly not in this book) that Lenin ever even thought about, much less attempted, making the last tsar into a communist.
02:0402:04, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
m
2020 United States presidential election
The consensus is that the majority of both Democrats and Republicans are unsatisfied with the nominees. The people want a third candidate. You don't have to agree with Jo Jorgensen. Censoring this information is only indicative of personal bias. It does not cause harm to keep Jo in the Infobox.
01:5601:56, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
2020 United States presidential election
"only real chance"??? That's a lie. The U.S. electorate is overwhelmingly unsatisfied with Biden and Trump. The electorate is looking for someone else. Why prevent the electorate from seeing and knowing who the three major candidates are? That's censorship. That goes against the principles of Wikipedia. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-trump-losing-among-voters-who-dont-like-him-or-biden/
01:4001:40, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
m
2020 United States presidential election
There was no "consensus." There was one or two people with an agenda. There are more than two people running for this position. Jo Jorgensen is a major candidate from a major, established party. She deserves to be in the info box, as do other candidates. Stop perpetuating the failed two-party system.
01:2101:21, 21 June 2020diffhist+237
m
2020 United States presidential election
"US elections are, sadly, a very "black and white" (or, in this case "blue and red") affair" - No, they are not. There is another popular, competent person running for this office. Wikipedia is a massive influencer. We, as a community, cannot allow other candidates to be censored and silenced just because that's the way it's been in the past. It's unacceptable.
13:1213:12, 18 February 2019diffhist+6
6ix9ine
Snitch9ine is what he'll ever be remembered as. I'm sorry. I know this does't fit his narrative, but it's simply fact. Google and Twitter the term. Better sooner than later.