A user with 120 edits. Account created on 16 June 2009.
25 August 2009
- 14:18 14:18, 25 August 2009 diff hist −248 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: I believe you will do the right thing because you have integrity, like an adult, rather than because you are being supervised, like a child.
- 13:56 13:56, 25 August 2009 diff hist +3,675 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Corrections added to comment full of misstatements
- 13:38 13:38, 25 August 2009 diff hist +470 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Forgiveness granted!
24 August 2009
- 20:42 20:42, 24 August 2009 diff hist +817 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Light teasing of a few obvious errors
- 19:25 19:25, 24 August 2009 diff hist +869 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Religious humanism
- 19:09 19:09, 24 August 2009 diff hist +2,118 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Strategy for advancement
20 August 2009
- 21:26 21:26, 20 August 2009 diff hist +224 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Wikipedia policy?
- 20:30 20:30, 20 August 2009 diff hist +723 Humanism Undid revision 309126034 by Wilson Delgado ( talk) Source citations were deleted as inconvenient to a POV. Restoring.
- 19:38 19:38, 20 August 2009 diff hist +723 Humanism Undid revision 309119228 by Wilson Delgado ( talk) Change not consistent with WP:UNDUE.
- 17:35 17:35, 20 August 2009 diff hist +582 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Agree: citing sources is very necessary!
- 17:17 17:17, 20 August 2009 diff hist +1,486 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Basis of comparison is problematic.
- 17:00 17:00, 20 August 2009 diff hist +214 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Strategy 1 or 2?
- 16:58 16:58, 20 August 2009 diff hist +920 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: Distinction cited YET AGAIN
18 August 2009
- 21:34 21:34, 18 August 2009 diff hist +1,480 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: Commonalities and differences
- 17:41 17:41, 18 August 2009 diff hist +974 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Strategy to proceed
- 17:17 17:17, 18 August 2009 diff hist +658 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: Question answered.
- 17:11 17:11, 18 August 2009 diff hist +654 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: What does Wikipedia policy say?
- 14:09 14:09, 18 August 2009 diff hist +396 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Answering another question with more questions
- 14:07 14:07, 18 August 2009 diff hist +333 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Answering a question with more questions
- 13:54 13:54, 18 August 2009 diff hist +1,062 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: new section
- 13:47 13:47, 18 August 2009 diff hist +206 Humanism Restoring a useful source. It doesn't stand alone, so the OED, Cambridge, and Collins dictionaries should remain too.
- 13:42 13:42, 18 August 2009 diff hist −49 Humanism Actually not supported by source citation: source citation had to be CUT DOWN in order to get the citation to match an unsourced opinion!
- 13:40 13:40, 18 August 2009 diff hist +5 m Humanism Restored entire citation that was deleted.
- 13:40 13:40, 18 August 2009 diff hist +407 Humanism Restored entire citation that was deleted.
- 13:38 13:38, 18 August 2009 diff hist −94 Humanism Unsourced waffle-words deleted.
- 13:38 13:38, 18 August 2009 diff hist +1 m Humanism No edit summary
- 13:37 13:37, 18 August 2009 diff hist +8 Humanism An example of why it's problematic to turn a lead paragraph into a disambiguation page.
- 13:35 13:35, 18 August 2009 diff hist −53 Humanism Should this go away, or the disambiguation hat-note? Which does Wikipedia policy say is correct?
17 August 2009
- 21:38 21:38, 17 August 2009 diff hist −72 Humanism The editor who keeps putting this back ONLY ever edits this article to try to bring greater prominence to other definitions from Humanism (disambiguation); NEVER to improve this article.
- 21:37 21:37, 17 August 2009 diff hist −166 Humanism Statement is redundant to the hat-note at the top of this paragraph.
- 21:36 21:36, 17 August 2009 diff hist −153 Humanism Self-contradictory statement: only a few sentences later, we're referring ALSO to religious and secular humanism, not just the life stance. This article covers all three.
- 21:27 21:27, 17 August 2009 diff hist −391 Humanism Why this article should not follow WP:DLINKS was not properly justified. Brought back into compliance with Wikipedia policy.
- 21:17 21:17, 17 August 2009 diff hist −391 Humanism These are not the correct way to disambiguate terms. Bringing article back in line with Wikipedia policy at WP:DLINKS.
13 August 2009
- 15:06 15:06, 13 August 2009 diff hist −194 Humanism This phrase actually contradicts the beliefs of hUUmanists and other organized humanist religions: they DON'T believe in transcendent entities and practices. See Religious humanism.
- 15:03 15:03, 13 August 2009 diff hist −1 m Humanism -s
- 15:02 15:02, 13 August 2009 diff hist −49 Humanism Not only secular, but also religious and life stance humanism, advocates this.
- 15:00 15:00, 13 August 2009 diff hist +98 Humanism Name three of the members of the "broad categories of ethical philosophies" and link to their respective articles
- 14:56 14:56, 13 August 2009 diff hist −177 Humanism There's been long debate in the talk page about whether Renaissance humanism does indeed link to modern humanism or not.
12 August 2009
- 19:51 19:51, 12 August 2009 diff hist +1,094 Talk:Humanism →Prominent alternative usages: Same sources cited: these have failed to achieve prominence.
- 16:55 16:55, 12 August 2009 diff hist +246 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: One topic?
- 16:49 16:49, 12 August 2009 diff hist +4 Talk:Humanism →Discussion
- 16:11 16:11, 12 August 2009 diff hist +1,356 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: Attempting to clear up some confusion on definitions, religious humanism, and counting page visits.
- 15:54 15:54, 12 August 2009 diff hist +1,406 Talk:Humanism If you want the disclaimers to go away, you must fix the error in your original comment that misrepresents my position.
- 13:30 13:30, 12 August 2009 diff hist +999 Talk:Humanism →Administrator's statement: Five incorrect statements corrected, and one statement agreed upon.
11 August 2009
- 19:50 19:50, 11 August 2009 diff hist +452 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: Wilson Delgado is squirming.
- 18:55 18:55, 11 August 2009 diff hist +1,406 Talk:Humanism Johnbod, you are correct. I should not assume that you know your statement to be incorrect, even after I've pointed it out to you three or four times, so I've removed wording that assumes you know.
- 18:47 18:47, 11 August 2009 diff hist +220 Talk:Humanism →Discussion
- 16:27 16:27, 11 August 2009 diff hist +322 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: I'm a HUGE Monty Python fan!
- 16:24 16:24, 11 August 2009 diff hist +1,080 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: Opinions not fit for Wikipedia
7 August 2009
- 16:42 16:42, 7 August 2009 diff hist +1,458 Talk:Humanism This is not "vandalism;" this is pointing out a point of fact. If you want this to go away, correct YOUR OWN comment instead. Then *I* will delete my own comment so you don't have to.
A user with 120 edits. Account created on 16 June 2009.
25 August 2009
- 14:18 14:18, 25 August 2009 diff hist −248 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: I believe you will do the right thing because you have integrity, like an adult, rather than because you are being supervised, like a child.
- 13:56 13:56, 25 August 2009 diff hist +3,675 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Corrections added to comment full of misstatements
- 13:38 13:38, 25 August 2009 diff hist +470 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Forgiveness granted!
24 August 2009
- 20:42 20:42, 24 August 2009 diff hist +817 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Light teasing of a few obvious errors
- 19:25 19:25, 24 August 2009 diff hist +869 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Religious humanism
- 19:09 19:09, 24 August 2009 diff hist +2,118 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Strategy for advancement
20 August 2009
- 21:26 21:26, 20 August 2009 diff hist +224 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Wikipedia policy?
- 20:30 20:30, 20 August 2009 diff hist +723 Humanism Undid revision 309126034 by Wilson Delgado ( talk) Source citations were deleted as inconvenient to a POV. Restoring.
- 19:38 19:38, 20 August 2009 diff hist +723 Humanism Undid revision 309119228 by Wilson Delgado ( talk) Change not consistent with WP:UNDUE.
- 17:35 17:35, 20 August 2009 diff hist +582 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Agree: citing sources is very necessary!
- 17:17 17:17, 20 August 2009 diff hist +1,486 Talk:Humanism →Comparing definitions: Basis of comparison is problematic.
- 17:00 17:00, 20 August 2009 diff hist +214 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Strategy 1 or 2?
- 16:58 16:58, 20 August 2009 diff hist +920 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: Distinction cited YET AGAIN
18 August 2009
- 21:34 21:34, 18 August 2009 diff hist +1,480 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: Commonalities and differences
- 17:41 17:41, 18 August 2009 diff hist +974 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Strategy to proceed
- 17:17 17:17, 18 August 2009 diff hist +658 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: Question answered.
- 17:11 17:11, 18 August 2009 diff hist +654 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: What does Wikipedia policy say?
- 14:09 14:09, 18 August 2009 diff hist +396 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Answering another question with more questions
- 14:07 14:07, 18 August 2009 diff hist +333 Talk:Humanism →Does humanism = secular humanism?: Answering a question with more questions
- 13:54 13:54, 18 August 2009 diff hist +1,062 Talk:Humanism →False Assumptions Above: new section
- 13:47 13:47, 18 August 2009 diff hist +206 Humanism Restoring a useful source. It doesn't stand alone, so the OED, Cambridge, and Collins dictionaries should remain too.
- 13:42 13:42, 18 August 2009 diff hist −49 Humanism Actually not supported by source citation: source citation had to be CUT DOWN in order to get the citation to match an unsourced opinion!
- 13:40 13:40, 18 August 2009 diff hist +5 m Humanism Restored entire citation that was deleted.
- 13:40 13:40, 18 August 2009 diff hist +407 Humanism Restored entire citation that was deleted.
- 13:38 13:38, 18 August 2009 diff hist −94 Humanism Unsourced waffle-words deleted.
- 13:38 13:38, 18 August 2009 diff hist +1 m Humanism No edit summary
- 13:37 13:37, 18 August 2009 diff hist +8 Humanism An example of why it's problematic to turn a lead paragraph into a disambiguation page.
- 13:35 13:35, 18 August 2009 diff hist −53 Humanism Should this go away, or the disambiguation hat-note? Which does Wikipedia policy say is correct?
17 August 2009
- 21:38 21:38, 17 August 2009 diff hist −72 Humanism The editor who keeps putting this back ONLY ever edits this article to try to bring greater prominence to other definitions from Humanism (disambiguation); NEVER to improve this article.
- 21:37 21:37, 17 August 2009 diff hist −166 Humanism Statement is redundant to the hat-note at the top of this paragraph.
- 21:36 21:36, 17 August 2009 diff hist −153 Humanism Self-contradictory statement: only a few sentences later, we're referring ALSO to religious and secular humanism, not just the life stance. This article covers all three.
- 21:27 21:27, 17 August 2009 diff hist −391 Humanism Why this article should not follow WP:DLINKS was not properly justified. Brought back into compliance with Wikipedia policy.
- 21:17 21:17, 17 August 2009 diff hist −391 Humanism These are not the correct way to disambiguate terms. Bringing article back in line with Wikipedia policy at WP:DLINKS.
13 August 2009
- 15:06 15:06, 13 August 2009 diff hist −194 Humanism This phrase actually contradicts the beliefs of hUUmanists and other organized humanist religions: they DON'T believe in transcendent entities and practices. See Religious humanism.
- 15:03 15:03, 13 August 2009 diff hist −1 m Humanism -s
- 15:02 15:02, 13 August 2009 diff hist −49 Humanism Not only secular, but also religious and life stance humanism, advocates this.
- 15:00 15:00, 13 August 2009 diff hist +98 Humanism Name three of the members of the "broad categories of ethical philosophies" and link to their respective articles
- 14:56 14:56, 13 August 2009 diff hist −177 Humanism There's been long debate in the talk page about whether Renaissance humanism does indeed link to modern humanism or not.
12 August 2009
- 19:51 19:51, 12 August 2009 diff hist +1,094 Talk:Humanism →Prominent alternative usages: Same sources cited: these have failed to achieve prominence.
- 16:55 16:55, 12 August 2009 diff hist +246 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: One topic?
- 16:49 16:49, 12 August 2009 diff hist +4 Talk:Humanism →Discussion
- 16:11 16:11, 12 August 2009 diff hist +1,356 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: Attempting to clear up some confusion on definitions, religious humanism, and counting page visits.
- 15:54 15:54, 12 August 2009 diff hist +1,406 Talk:Humanism If you want the disclaimers to go away, you must fix the error in your original comment that misrepresents my position.
- 13:30 13:30, 12 August 2009 diff hist +999 Talk:Humanism →Administrator's statement: Five incorrect statements corrected, and one statement agreed upon.
11 August 2009
- 19:50 19:50, 11 August 2009 diff hist +452 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: Wilson Delgado is squirming.
- 18:55 18:55, 11 August 2009 diff hist +1,406 Talk:Humanism Johnbod, you are correct. I should not assume that you know your statement to be incorrect, even after I've pointed it out to you three or four times, so I've removed wording that assumes you know.
- 18:47 18:47, 11 August 2009 diff hist +220 Talk:Humanism →Discussion
- 16:27 16:27, 11 August 2009 diff hist +322 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: I'm a HUGE Monty Python fan!
- 16:24 16:24, 11 August 2009 diff hist +1,080 Talk:Humanism →Discussion: Opinions not fit for Wikipedia
7 August 2009
- 16:42 16:42, 7 August 2009 diff hist +1,458 Talk:Humanism This is not "vandalism;" this is pointing out a point of fact. If you want this to go away, correct YOUR OWN comment instead. Then *I* will delete my own comment so you don't have to.