16:4716:47, 11 September 2012diffhist−3,280
Science 2.0
Oddly written. The citation for history was 2009 but Science 2.0 was created in 2006. General misunderstanding of the movement, it was before open science. Corrected Burke's NY Acad of Science link
03:0803:08, 5 June 2012diffhist+11,090
Science 2.0
Put POV back in. If this is being discussed, it should not be split first and ignore concerns about the accuracy. ~~~~
14:3414:34, 31 May 2012diffhist−1,663
Science 2.0
Deleted duplicated sentence about Web 2.0, deleted a quote from an unspecified source with no first, deleted what seems to be open science hijacking of Science 2.0
16:4716:47, 11 September 2012diffhist−3,280
Science 2.0
Oddly written. The citation for history was 2009 but Science 2.0 was created in 2006. General misunderstanding of the movement, it was before open science. Corrected Burke's NY Acad of Science link
03:0803:08, 5 June 2012diffhist+11,090
Science 2.0
Put POV back in. If this is being discussed, it should not be split first and ignore concerns about the accuracy. ~~~~
14:3414:34, 31 May 2012diffhist−1,663
Science 2.0
Deleted duplicated sentence about Web 2.0, deleted a quote from an unspecified source with no first, deleted what seems to be open science hijacking of Science 2.0