A user with 443 edits. Account created on 10 May 2009.
16 August 2012
- 14:28 14:28, 16 August 2012 diff hist +111 User talk:Radiantenergy →Hello: new section
25 June 2011
- 18:22 18:22, 25 June 2011 diff hist −654 Isaac Tigrett This is not relevat to the mans life. He's said many things about Sai Baba, why only this in the article. It was placed by someone trying to spread their agenda against Sai Baba
10 June 2011
- 11:49 11:49, 10 June 2011 diff hist −415 Isaac Tigrett No edit summary
25 May 2011
- 18:46 18:46, 25 May 2011 diff hist +266 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
24 May 2011
- 15:42 15:42, 24 May 2011 diff hist +51 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
23 May 2011
- 19:10 19:10, 23 May 2011 diff hist +358 Sathya Sai Baba More clarification from court documents
- 17:43 17:43, 23 May 2011 diff hist +1,357 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikisunn →Comments by other users
- 16:45 16:45, 23 May 2011 diff hist −38 Sathya Sai Baba No where in the article does it say "both parties" dismissed. The article states that the plaintiff "self dismissed"
- 16:38 16:38, 23 May 2011 diff hist −1,944 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikisunn You cant just delete my comment. That section is for other users to comment. I have experience with this editor and others as well.
- 14:32 14:32, 23 May 2011 diff hist +853 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Unwanted Removal of Edits which provide correct info
- 14:12 14:12, 23 May 2011 diff hist +1,944 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikisunn →Comments by other users
19 May 2011
- 17:09 17:09, 19 May 2011 diff hist +1,352 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Unwanted Removal of Edits which provide correct info
18 May 2011
- 21:45 21:45, 18 May 2011 diff hist +2,290 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Unwanted Removal of Edits which provide correct info
6 June 2010
- 03:17 03:17, 6 June 2010 diff hist +773 User talk:Sailpra →Sathya Sai Baba
30 March 2010
- 00:29 00:29, 30 March 2010 diff hist −1,007 Sathya Sai Baba This is an opinion, not sourced
23 March 2010
- 21:55 21:55, 23 March 2010 diff hist +1,163 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Re-opening of old case
19 March 2010
- 20:53 20:53, 19 March 2010 diff hist +740 Sathya Sai Baba I guess we are starting this again, this is factual information
17 January 2010
- 06:21 06:21, 17 January 2010 diff hist −1 Sathya Sai Baba →Biography
- 06:20 06:20, 17 January 2010 diff hist −285 Sathya Sai Baba I have never seen a biography start out like this. This doesn't make any sense. It doesn't flow, if anything it belongs at the end not the beginning.
14 January 2010
- 22:16 22:16, 14 January 2010 diff hist +853 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Restored banners
- 20:11 20:11, 14 January 2010 diff hist −285 Sathya Sai Baba This doesn't belong here. There is nothing like this in the Lead for Jesus for example. No one is alive today that was there then. Jesus's biography was written by his disciples
- 20:06 20:06, 14 January 2010 diff hist +631 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Restored banners
- 19:57 19:57, 14 January 2010 diff hist +1,839 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The lede
8 January 2010
- 18:40 18:40, 8 January 2010 diff hist +271 Sathya Sai Baba Quote from a New York Times 2002 Article
5 January 2010
4 January 2010
- 22:31 22:31, 4 January 2010 diff hist +1,044 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Restored banners
16 December 2009
- 22:47 22:47, 16 December 2009 diff hist +1,107 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Complying with requests for clean-up
15 December 2009
- 23:08 23:08, 15 December 2009 diff hist +287 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Complying with requests for clean-up
8 December 2009
20 November 2009
- 16:49 16:49, 20 November 2009 diff hist +977 Sathya Sai Baba Restored BBC quote
- 16:48 16:48, 20 November 2009 diff hist +1 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
- 16:47 16:47, 20 November 2009 diff hist +263 Sathya Sai Baba That's fine we can leave this but it should be in the criticism section
- 05:50 05:50, 20 November 2009 diff hist −263 Sathya Sai Baba This an opinion
- 05:45 05:45, 20 November 2009 diff hist +11 Sathya Sai Baba If someone can come up with proof in a "reliable" source that Sai Baba was formerly charged with a crime then so be it. Because someone disputes it does mean anything. Show the proof
19 November 2009
14 November 2009
- 00:33 00:33, 14 November 2009 diff hist −5,455 Sathya Sai Baba Cleaning up and Condensing -still more to do
- 00:21 00:21, 14 November 2009 diff hist −1,685 Sathya Sai Baba Cleaned up. removed non-relevant content
- 00:15 00:15, 14 November 2009 diff hist +807 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
13 November 2009
- 01:02 01:02, 13 November 2009 diff hist +807 Sathya Sai Baba Please stop removing this as there is no justification. We can go on and on if you like, but these two sentences state relevant facts
12 November 2009
- 19:55 19:55, 12 November 2009 diff hist +807 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
8 November 2009
- 02:01 02:01, 8 November 2009 diff hist +23 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
5 November 2009
- 19:37 19:37, 5 November 2009 diff hist +800 Sathya Sai Baba Again, just because you claim the source is unreliable doesn't make it so. When discussed on the RS board it was deemed reliable for the article. Its been cut down considerably
28 October 2009
- 21:03 21:03, 28 October 2009 diff hist +763 Sathya Sai Baba No need for the foul language, once again these are facts. If you have a problem with the source bring it up again on the RS Board
21 October 2009
- 22:15 22:15, 21 October 2009 diff hist +569 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
- 16:40 16:40, 21 October 2009 diff hist +155 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
- 03:41 03:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist +15 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
- 03:41 03:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist +79 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →WP:TRUTH
- 03:41 03:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist +288 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →WP:TRUTH: new section
- 03:35 03:35, 21 October 2009 diff hist −854 Sathya Sai Baba Case was dismissed. Source gives false information and makes it appear as though there is something ongoing. Only based on speculation boarding on libel with nothing to back it up
- 03:32 03:32, 21 October 2009 diff hist +55 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
A user with 443 edits. Account created on 10 May 2009.
16 August 2012
- 14:28 14:28, 16 August 2012 diff hist +111 User talk:Radiantenergy →Hello: new section
25 June 2011
- 18:22 18:22, 25 June 2011 diff hist −654 Isaac Tigrett This is not relevat to the mans life. He's said many things about Sai Baba, why only this in the article. It was placed by someone trying to spread their agenda against Sai Baba
10 June 2011
- 11:49 11:49, 10 June 2011 diff hist −415 Isaac Tigrett No edit summary
25 May 2011
- 18:46 18:46, 25 May 2011 diff hist +266 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
24 May 2011
- 15:42 15:42, 24 May 2011 diff hist +51 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
23 May 2011
- 19:10 19:10, 23 May 2011 diff hist +358 Sathya Sai Baba More clarification from court documents
- 17:43 17:43, 23 May 2011 diff hist +1,357 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikisunn →Comments by other users
- 16:45 16:45, 23 May 2011 diff hist −38 Sathya Sai Baba No where in the article does it say "both parties" dismissed. The article states that the plaintiff "self dismissed"
- 16:38 16:38, 23 May 2011 diff hist −1,944 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikisunn You cant just delete my comment. That section is for other users to comment. I have experience with this editor and others as well.
- 14:32 14:32, 23 May 2011 diff hist +853 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Unwanted Removal of Edits which provide correct info
- 14:12 14:12, 23 May 2011 diff hist +1,944 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikisunn →Comments by other users
19 May 2011
- 17:09 17:09, 19 May 2011 diff hist +1,352 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Unwanted Removal of Edits which provide correct info
18 May 2011
- 21:45 21:45, 18 May 2011 diff hist +2,290 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Unwanted Removal of Edits which provide correct info
6 June 2010
- 03:17 03:17, 6 June 2010 diff hist +773 User talk:Sailpra →Sathya Sai Baba
30 March 2010
- 00:29 00:29, 30 March 2010 diff hist −1,007 Sathya Sai Baba This is an opinion, not sourced
23 March 2010
- 21:55 21:55, 23 March 2010 diff hist +1,163 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Re-opening of old case
19 March 2010
- 20:53 20:53, 19 March 2010 diff hist +740 Sathya Sai Baba I guess we are starting this again, this is factual information
17 January 2010
- 06:21 06:21, 17 January 2010 diff hist −1 Sathya Sai Baba →Biography
- 06:20 06:20, 17 January 2010 diff hist −285 Sathya Sai Baba I have never seen a biography start out like this. This doesn't make any sense. It doesn't flow, if anything it belongs at the end not the beginning.
14 January 2010
- 22:16 22:16, 14 January 2010 diff hist +853 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Restored banners
- 20:11 20:11, 14 January 2010 diff hist −285 Sathya Sai Baba This doesn't belong here. There is nothing like this in the Lead for Jesus for example. No one is alive today that was there then. Jesus's biography was written by his disciples
- 20:06 20:06, 14 January 2010 diff hist +631 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Restored banners
- 19:57 19:57, 14 January 2010 diff hist +1,839 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The lede
8 January 2010
- 18:40 18:40, 8 January 2010 diff hist +271 Sathya Sai Baba Quote from a New York Times 2002 Article
5 January 2010
4 January 2010
- 22:31 22:31, 4 January 2010 diff hist +1,044 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Restored banners
16 December 2009
- 22:47 22:47, 16 December 2009 diff hist +1,107 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Complying with requests for clean-up
15 December 2009
- 23:08 23:08, 15 December 2009 diff hist +287 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Complying with requests for clean-up
8 December 2009
20 November 2009
- 16:49 16:49, 20 November 2009 diff hist +977 Sathya Sai Baba Restored BBC quote
- 16:48 16:48, 20 November 2009 diff hist +1 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
- 16:47 16:47, 20 November 2009 diff hist +263 Sathya Sai Baba That's fine we can leave this but it should be in the criticism section
- 05:50 05:50, 20 November 2009 diff hist −263 Sathya Sai Baba This an opinion
- 05:45 05:45, 20 November 2009 diff hist +11 Sathya Sai Baba If someone can come up with proof in a "reliable" source that Sai Baba was formerly charged with a crime then so be it. Because someone disputes it does mean anything. Show the proof
19 November 2009
14 November 2009
- 00:33 00:33, 14 November 2009 diff hist −5,455 Sathya Sai Baba Cleaning up and Condensing -still more to do
- 00:21 00:21, 14 November 2009 diff hist −1,685 Sathya Sai Baba Cleaned up. removed non-relevant content
- 00:15 00:15, 14 November 2009 diff hist +807 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
13 November 2009
- 01:02 01:02, 13 November 2009 diff hist +807 Sathya Sai Baba Please stop removing this as there is no justification. We can go on and on if you like, but these two sentences state relevant facts
12 November 2009
- 19:55 19:55, 12 November 2009 diff hist +807 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
8 November 2009
- 02:01 02:01, 8 November 2009 diff hist +23 Sathya Sai Baba No edit summary
5 November 2009
- 19:37 19:37, 5 November 2009 diff hist +800 Sathya Sai Baba Again, just because you claim the source is unreliable doesn't make it so. When discussed on the RS board it was deemed reliable for the article. Its been cut down considerably
28 October 2009
- 21:03 21:03, 28 October 2009 diff hist +763 Sathya Sai Baba No need for the foul language, once again these are facts. If you have a problem with the source bring it up again on the RS Board
21 October 2009
- 22:15 22:15, 21 October 2009 diff hist +569 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
- 16:40 16:40, 21 October 2009 diff hist +155 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
- 03:41 03:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist +15 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again
- 03:41 03:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist +79 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →WP:TRUTH
- 03:41 03:41, 21 October 2009 diff hist +288 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →WP:TRUTH: new section
- 03:35 03:35, 21 October 2009 diff hist −854 Sathya Sai Baba Case was dismissed. Source gives false information and makes it appear as though there is something ongoing. Only based on speculation boarding on libel with nothing to back it up
- 03:32 03:32, 21 October 2009 diff hist +55 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →The Pioneer Again