14:3114:31, 20 April 2022diffhist+148
Élisabeth Lévy
→Radio: Separate potentially contentious claims still needing referencing from parts that have references, remove implied causation. Note that
WP:BLP applies to living person who aren't the subject of the article, but I assume you have sources you can add for these claims about the two men in question reasonably quickly; if not, they will be removed as well.
14:1814:18, 20 April 2022diffhist+182
Élisabeth Lévy
→Nouveaux réactionnaires: The new source is good for a different statement, which I have added; the existing statement is unclear if it is sourced - I'm afraid my French won't let me follow the video itself. I would suggest, if the video does support the first statement, it be moved after the statement about her being included in the documentary.
14:1414:14, 20 April 2022diffhist−489
Élisabeth Lévy
Undid revision 1083754521 by
Sulpyensid (
talk) -- Once again, the phrasing here implies causation that is not in the article referenced. 'After' will be taken by many as suggesting that those matters were the cause. It also isn't clear who is being accused of being a fascist. Given
WP:BLP, please take this to the Talk page to work out how to improve it.Tag: Undo
14:0514:05, 20 April 2022diffhist−363
Élisabeth Lévy
→Nouveaux réactionnaires: Remove claims about firing from France Culture that imply a causative relationship between guests and the loss of her job, when the source simply says the programme was cancelled because it wasn't felt to be a good idea to have such a weekly programme. This is thus unsourced controversial material and should be removed per
WP:BLP.
14:0414:04, 20 April 2022diffhist+202
Élisabeth Lévy
→Nouveaux réactionnaires: Replace failed verification - it is still the case that the source does not indicate a specialisation in such interviews, and it doesn't mention nouveuax reactionnaires, just the question of whether the interviewee is a reactionnair (reactionary).
12:3212:32, 20 April 2022diffhist−274
Élisabeth Lévy
Undid revision 1083741825 by
Sambc (
talk) and replaced citation needed tags with unsourced section, which is more appropriate. For reasons, see previous edit summary.
12:2312:23, 20 April 2022diffhist+263
Élisabeth Lévy
→Pedophilia: Clarify, expand, hopefully remove implicit negativity not supported by references. Remove reference to the film 'M', which does not seem to appear in the source.
14:3114:31, 20 April 2022diffhist+148
Élisabeth Lévy
→Radio: Separate potentially contentious claims still needing referencing from parts that have references, remove implied causation. Note that
WP:BLP applies to living person who aren't the subject of the article, but I assume you have sources you can add for these claims about the two men in question reasonably quickly; if not, they will be removed as well.
14:1814:18, 20 April 2022diffhist+182
Élisabeth Lévy
→Nouveaux réactionnaires: The new source is good for a different statement, which I have added; the existing statement is unclear if it is sourced - I'm afraid my French won't let me follow the video itself. I would suggest, if the video does support the first statement, it be moved after the statement about her being included in the documentary.
14:1414:14, 20 April 2022diffhist−489
Élisabeth Lévy
Undid revision 1083754521 by
Sulpyensid (
talk) -- Once again, the phrasing here implies causation that is not in the article referenced. 'After' will be taken by many as suggesting that those matters were the cause. It also isn't clear who is being accused of being a fascist. Given
WP:BLP, please take this to the Talk page to work out how to improve it.Tag: Undo
14:0514:05, 20 April 2022diffhist−363
Élisabeth Lévy
→Nouveaux réactionnaires: Remove claims about firing from France Culture that imply a causative relationship between guests and the loss of her job, when the source simply says the programme was cancelled because it wasn't felt to be a good idea to have such a weekly programme. This is thus unsourced controversial material and should be removed per
WP:BLP.
14:0414:04, 20 April 2022diffhist+202
Élisabeth Lévy
→Nouveaux réactionnaires: Replace failed verification - it is still the case that the source does not indicate a specialisation in such interviews, and it doesn't mention nouveuax reactionnaires, just the question of whether the interviewee is a reactionnair (reactionary).
12:3212:32, 20 April 2022diffhist−274
Élisabeth Lévy
Undid revision 1083741825 by
Sambc (
talk) and replaced citation needed tags with unsourced section, which is more appropriate. For reasons, see previous edit summary.
12:2312:23, 20 April 2022diffhist+263
Élisabeth Lévy
→Pedophilia: Clarify, expand, hopefully remove implicit negativity not supported by references. Remove reference to the film 'M', which does not seem to appear in the source.