02:4302:43, 11 July 2023diffhist+3,302
GPT-4
Undid revision 1164780397 by
StereoFolic (
talk) I certainly see your point: verifiability is important. However, in the spirit of making information freely accessible, I think it might be worthwhile to consider a more loose interpretation of the guidelines. Patel is a notable figure, as evidenced by his following on social media, and it's unlikely that his post is a complete fabrication.Tags: UndoReverted
02:5202:52, 4 May 2023diffhist−293
GPT-4
reorganize Limitations into new top-level section, performed copyedits including removing The Verge (failed verification; the article is exclusively about ChatGPT, only mentioning GPT-4 as "Bing" in passing) -- needs improvement but I think an important section to ensure the article's neutrality and to reorganize the various mentions of the model's limitations into one placeTag: Visual edit: Switched
01:5201:52, 3 April 2023diffhist−1,248
GPT-4
This section is best removed until it has more information on what the service actually provides (other than things that we already know GPT-4 can do) and has a tone that doesn't strongly sound like an advertisement.Tag: Visual edit
00:4600:46, 31 March 2023diffhist+461
GPT-4
→Usage: transclude section about Microsoft's chatbot AI from the Bing article to replace the minimal information this article has regarding it, clarify wording regarding OpenAI's openness (or lack thereof) with regards to GPT-4's technical detailsTag: Visual edit
06:2006:20, 24 March 2023diffhist−8
GPT-4
→top: Split training + capabilities section into two separate sections, then moved around some paragraphs to the right sections (removing the duplicate Capabilities section near the bottom in the process).Tags: Mobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
22 March 2023
00:5800:58, 22 March 2023diffhist+209
GPT-4
Reverted good faith citation improvements by
User:DFlhb; I should have made it clearer that the citation is for the SAT percentiles (and have done so in this edit). (The citation is necessary since OpenAI posts the SAT scores and percentiles per section, but this article reports the overall score).Tag: Visual edit
06:3806:38, 21 March 2023diffhist+285
GPT-4
→top: moved info out of incorrect section; also, added information regarding GPT-4's aptitude on standardized tests.Tags: Mobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
02:4302:43, 11 July 2023diffhist+3,302
GPT-4
Undid revision 1164780397 by
StereoFolic (
talk) I certainly see your point: verifiability is important. However, in the spirit of making information freely accessible, I think it might be worthwhile to consider a more loose interpretation of the guidelines. Patel is a notable figure, as evidenced by his following on social media, and it's unlikely that his post is a complete fabrication.Tags: UndoReverted
02:5202:52, 4 May 2023diffhist−293
GPT-4
reorganize Limitations into new top-level section, performed copyedits including removing The Verge (failed verification; the article is exclusively about ChatGPT, only mentioning GPT-4 as "Bing" in passing) -- needs improvement but I think an important section to ensure the article's neutrality and to reorganize the various mentions of the model's limitations into one placeTag: Visual edit: Switched
01:5201:52, 3 April 2023diffhist−1,248
GPT-4
This section is best removed until it has more information on what the service actually provides (other than things that we already know GPT-4 can do) and has a tone that doesn't strongly sound like an advertisement.Tag: Visual edit
00:4600:46, 31 March 2023diffhist+461
GPT-4
→Usage: transclude section about Microsoft's chatbot AI from the Bing article to replace the minimal information this article has regarding it, clarify wording regarding OpenAI's openness (or lack thereof) with regards to GPT-4's technical detailsTag: Visual edit
06:2006:20, 24 March 2023diffhist−8
GPT-4
→top: Split training + capabilities section into two separate sections, then moved around some paragraphs to the right sections (removing the duplicate Capabilities section near the bottom in the process).Tags: Mobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit
22 March 2023
00:5800:58, 22 March 2023diffhist+209
GPT-4
Reverted good faith citation improvements by
User:DFlhb; I should have made it clearer that the citation is for the SAT percentiles (and have done so in this edit). (The citation is necessary since OpenAI posts the SAT scores and percentiles per section, but this article reports the overall score).Tag: Visual edit
06:3806:38, 21 March 2023diffhist+285
GPT-4
→top: moved info out of incorrect section; also, added information regarding GPT-4's aptitude on standardized tests.Tags: Mobile editMobile app editAndroid app edit