19:5419:54, 1 December 2021diffhist−349
Wikipedia
No need to try and goad people into thinking Wikipedia is the best site ever. Let them decide for themselves.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
09:5309:53, 1 December 2021diffhist+2
African elephant
All I did was tweak the wording a little. Why would I need a "source" for that? And it doesn't matter what I did at the start. I gave you three arguments that prove that my edits are in line with consensus. Aside from making baseless claims you have yet to mount any kind of serious refutation. The onus is on YOU to demonstrate why I ought to cease my editing as they are demonstrably in line with consensus. Period.Tags: UndoReverted
07:5807:58, 1 December 2021diffhist+2
African elephant
Dude, you are the one reverting my edits for literally no reason other than personal preference. I have consistently shown how my edits are in line with consensus, whereas all you can say is "last best" like some kind of NPC. I am not edit-warrring. I'm simply not tolerating your unsubstantiated reverts. If you disagree with my edits, take it to my talk page. But I'm not going to accept "last best" as an answer.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
07:5507:55, 1 December 2021diffhist+57
Panthera tigris tigris
Check my previous edit summaries, I have provided a source multiple times, you fucking moron. But that other guy just wants to remove my edits for literally no reason other than "last best". Get some fucking glasses instead of being a powertripping egomaniac.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
00:3800:38, 30 November 2021diffhist−8
African elephant
1. Taxons above species are treated as a collective rather than an individual. E.g. "felids are a family' as opposed to "the tiger is a species" 2. Taxons above species are emboldened 3. "Elephant species" is redundant and I don't think I need to tell you why If you're going to revert this edit, you have to provide a reason. Reverting an edit just because is edit-warring and could be considered disruptive or destructive.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:3918:39, 29 November 2021diffhist0
Humanzee
1. Chimpanzee refers to Pan troglodytes. While it's true that it can also be applied to Pan paniscus, that's not how the word is generally used. 2. The taxonbox (or whatever it's called) specifies Pan troglodytes, so the article should match the taxonbox for the sake of consistency. 3. You can't hybridize with a genus, you can only hybridize with a different species. The idea of a species-genus hybrid makes no sense. If you wish to revert my edit, please provide a counterargument.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
19:0119:01, 27 November 2021diffhist+18
Neofelis
What is "test" supposed to mean? Again, please do not revert edits without reason. If there's a valid reason my edits ought to be reverted, fine, but I don't think anyone here understands what you're trying to accomplish.Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
17:5317:53, 27 November 2021diffhist+119
Clouded leopard
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198941930976X At the moment I don't know how to cite sources in articles, so if someone else could do that I'd appreciate it a lot.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
19:5419:54, 1 December 2021diffhist−349
Wikipedia
No need to try and goad people into thinking Wikipedia is the best site ever. Let them decide for themselves.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
09:5309:53, 1 December 2021diffhist+2
African elephant
All I did was tweak the wording a little. Why would I need a "source" for that? And it doesn't matter what I did at the start. I gave you three arguments that prove that my edits are in line with consensus. Aside from making baseless claims you have yet to mount any kind of serious refutation. The onus is on YOU to demonstrate why I ought to cease my editing as they are demonstrably in line with consensus. Period.Tags: UndoReverted
07:5807:58, 1 December 2021diffhist+2
African elephant
Dude, you are the one reverting my edits for literally no reason other than personal preference. I have consistently shown how my edits are in line with consensus, whereas all you can say is "last best" like some kind of NPC. I am not edit-warrring. I'm simply not tolerating your unsubstantiated reverts. If you disagree with my edits, take it to my talk page. But I'm not going to accept "last best" as an answer.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
07:5507:55, 1 December 2021diffhist+57
Panthera tigris tigris
Check my previous edit summaries, I have provided a source multiple times, you fucking moron. But that other guy just wants to remove my edits for literally no reason other than "last best". Get some fucking glasses instead of being a powertripping egomaniac.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
00:3800:38, 30 November 2021diffhist−8
African elephant
1. Taxons above species are treated as a collective rather than an individual. E.g. "felids are a family' as opposed to "the tiger is a species" 2. Taxons above species are emboldened 3. "Elephant species" is redundant and I don't think I need to tell you why If you're going to revert this edit, you have to provide a reason. Reverting an edit just because is edit-warring and could be considered disruptive or destructive.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:3918:39, 29 November 2021diffhist0
Humanzee
1. Chimpanzee refers to Pan troglodytes. While it's true that it can also be applied to Pan paniscus, that's not how the word is generally used. 2. The taxonbox (or whatever it's called) specifies Pan troglodytes, so the article should match the taxonbox for the sake of consistency. 3. You can't hybridize with a genus, you can only hybridize with a different species. The idea of a species-genus hybrid makes no sense. If you wish to revert my edit, please provide a counterargument.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
19:0119:01, 27 November 2021diffhist+18
Neofelis
What is "test" supposed to mean? Again, please do not revert edits without reason. If there's a valid reason my edits ought to be reverted, fine, but I don't think anyone here understands what you're trying to accomplish.Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
17:5317:53, 27 November 2021diffhist+119
Clouded leopard
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198941930976X At the moment I don't know how to cite sources in articles, so if someone else could do that I'd appreciate it a lot.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit