08:3108:31, 4 July 2024diffhist+25,624
Special relativity
Inserting material snipped from Spacetime in this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spacetime&diff=1232543300&oldid=1230875843
08:1808:18, 4 July 2024diffhist−25,886
Spacetime
→Beyond the basics: In the Talk discussion, "Moving the "Beyond the basics" section to Special relativity?", there appears to me no objection to my moving this section to Special Relativity. I begin by blanking this section.
05:5305:53, 25 June 2024diffhist+242
Spacetime
Undid good faith revision
1230513593 by
OzzyOlly (
talk) Science articles need to start with general readability topics, leaving technical material for later. However, the topics covered in this section, although special relativity topics, are quite technical, presenting a dilemma: placement before and after the general relativity section are *both* problematical. Hence the warning.Tag: Undo
07:1507:15, 31 March 2024diffhist+1,114
Einstein's thought experiments
→EPR paradox: Restored quote. The reader should not be forced to read through the entire Landsman reference to find a recounting of Einstein and Rosenfeld's discussion. Arguments about what Einstein "really" thought about EPR have been going on for years with the authors sharply dividing in different camps, of which Landsman's interpretation is only one of many.
08:3108:31, 4 July 2024diffhist+25,624
Special relativity
Inserting material snipped from Spacetime in this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spacetime&diff=1232543300&oldid=1230875843
08:1808:18, 4 July 2024diffhist−25,886
Spacetime
→Beyond the basics: In the Talk discussion, "Moving the "Beyond the basics" section to Special relativity?", there appears to me no objection to my moving this section to Special Relativity. I begin by blanking this section.
05:5305:53, 25 June 2024diffhist+242
Spacetime
Undid good faith revision
1230513593 by
OzzyOlly (
talk) Science articles need to start with general readability topics, leaving technical material for later. However, the topics covered in this section, although special relativity topics, are quite technical, presenting a dilemma: placement before and after the general relativity section are *both* problematical. Hence the warning.Tag: Undo
07:1507:15, 31 March 2024diffhist+1,114
Einstein's thought experiments
→EPR paradox: Restored quote. The reader should not be forced to read through the entire Landsman reference to find a recounting of Einstein and Rosenfeld's discussion. Arguments about what Einstein "really" thought about EPR have been going on for years with the authors sharply dividing in different camps, of which Landsman's interpretation is only one of many.