06:1606:16, 24 December 2018diffhist−18
Theuderic IV
@kansasbear, you dont even want to answer my queries and engage in a discussion and you insist i am vandalising. The reference for theuderic being born was on the aformentioned brittanica article, which says he was born after 711. As his father was dead by 715, he could latest be born jn 716 (nothing original about that, is just common sense). Other editors do that too. Lets jus leave it be and stop fightingTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
06:0806:08, 24 December 2018diffhist−2
Childebert III
We have been through this before Kansas bear. Like i said on your page, there are no other references save brittanica: an academic source used everywhere on this site (not just by me). Please dont levy false accusations or grind your axeTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
05:5005:50, 24 December 2018diffhist−24
Theuderic IV
@kansasbear, it seems like you are too illuterate to read that i am open to discussing these things. I rly couldnt be care when he was born, all i SUGGESTed was simply to give a given range and an average date till a better date could be found. (We went through the same thing with geoffrey of monmouth). Regardless, while you want to grind an axe with me, i will not be interested in fighting with you.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
05:4505:45, 24 December 2018diffhist0
Childebert III
@kansasbear, dont delete sources just because you dont like it. While brittanica is not the gospel truth at all times, it is the only academic reference encyclopedia on these characters. It seems likr you are simply changing dates back because you have an axe to grind. Regardless, i know when im not wanted and I will oblige and this would be my last edit on wiki.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
10:3310:33, 18 December 2018diffhist0
Gordian II
No references to birth except for a really old source (by samuel maunder in 1850, page 734) which says that he was 45 at his death, so put 193 as an approximation.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
06:1606:16, 24 December 2018diffhist−18
Theuderic IV
@kansasbear, you dont even want to answer my queries and engage in a discussion and you insist i am vandalising. The reference for theuderic being born was on the aformentioned brittanica article, which says he was born after 711. As his father was dead by 715, he could latest be born jn 716 (nothing original about that, is just common sense). Other editors do that too. Lets jus leave it be and stop fightingTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
06:0806:08, 24 December 2018diffhist−2
Childebert III
We have been through this before Kansas bear. Like i said on your page, there are no other references save brittanica: an academic source used everywhere on this site (not just by me). Please dont levy false accusations or grind your axeTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
05:5005:50, 24 December 2018diffhist−24
Theuderic IV
@kansasbear, it seems like you are too illuterate to read that i am open to discussing these things. I rly couldnt be care when he was born, all i SUGGESTed was simply to give a given range and an average date till a better date could be found. (We went through the same thing with geoffrey of monmouth). Regardless, while you want to grind an axe with me, i will not be interested in fighting with you.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
05:4505:45, 24 December 2018diffhist0
Childebert III
@kansasbear, dont delete sources just because you dont like it. While brittanica is not the gospel truth at all times, it is the only academic reference encyclopedia on these characters. It seems likr you are simply changing dates back because you have an axe to grind. Regardless, i know when im not wanted and I will oblige and this would be my last edit on wiki.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
10:3310:33, 18 December 2018diffhist0
Gordian II
No references to birth except for a really old source (by samuel maunder in 1850, page 734) which says that he was 45 at his death, so put 193 as an approximation.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit