01:2301:23, 2 January 2017diffhist+302
Hyrcania
Undid revision 757839575 by
Mugsalot (
talk) stop reverting my contribution. Obviously I know it says more than just that since I wrote it and you keep removing it without comment
13:2013:20, 27 December 2016diffhist−73
Sumer
Undid revision 756841032 by
John D. Croft (
talk) unhelpful edits - flipped from correctly saying Etana was legendary, to incorrectly saying Etana was other than legendary; changing facts
13:5913:59, 22 December 2016diffhist+121
London
(
talk) you are mistaken, it is indeed mentioned in the body. Reverting to stable version; this is precisely why talk pages were invented and why there is a
WP:BRD page
13:0813:08, 22 December 2016diffhist+121
London
rv (
talk) it would seem your assessment of the importance of this info, is your subjective and solitary assessment; therefore I am reverting to consensus, pending adherence to the
WP:BRD protocol
21 December 2016
12:5812:58, 21 December 2016diffhist+121
London
Undid revision 755987555 by
Haldraper (
talk) rv misleading edit summary. When you "cut a few words" that also happen to cut out factual history, you need some better explanation.
15:0315:03, 17 November 2016diffhist−145
Canaan
of course and you are STILL edit warring vs. consensus and rather lackadaisical vis-a-vis using "discussion page" here; I see no one but you who thinks Canaan is a "state" "established" (???) in the 16th century BC
12:2812:28, 17 November 2016diffhist−145
Canaan
WE can't say this is "state or territory established" in any particular century, this is precisely how vague estimates get petrified into solid viewpoints, all similar edits should be discussed first
16:2516:25, 14 October 2016diffhist−251
Abyla
copyedit & correct unidiomatic language, eg 'actual' does not mean 'current' in English as it does in French
12:0912:09, 19 September 2016diffhist−11
Gutian people
Move detailed para out of intro / lede into own section; rearrange more neutrally and with fewer "Howevers" in same paragraph
10:5310:53, 15 August 2016diffhist−58
Sumer
It is actually against site policy to go converting articles in normal BC format, into the abnormal and contentious BCE format
10:2110:21, 10 August 2016diffhist+122
Sumer
For future reference: If you spot vandalism, always revert to the last non-vandalized version rather than attempt to fix it by hand
01:2301:23, 2 January 2017diffhist+302
Hyrcania
Undid revision 757839575 by
Mugsalot (
talk) stop reverting my contribution. Obviously I know it says more than just that since I wrote it and you keep removing it without comment
13:2013:20, 27 December 2016diffhist−73
Sumer
Undid revision 756841032 by
John D. Croft (
talk) unhelpful edits - flipped from correctly saying Etana was legendary, to incorrectly saying Etana was other than legendary; changing facts
13:5913:59, 22 December 2016diffhist+121
London
(
talk) you are mistaken, it is indeed mentioned in the body. Reverting to stable version; this is precisely why talk pages were invented and why there is a
WP:BRD page
13:0813:08, 22 December 2016diffhist+121
London
rv (
talk) it would seem your assessment of the importance of this info, is your subjective and solitary assessment; therefore I am reverting to consensus, pending adherence to the
WP:BRD protocol
21 December 2016
12:5812:58, 21 December 2016diffhist+121
London
Undid revision 755987555 by
Haldraper (
talk) rv misleading edit summary. When you "cut a few words" that also happen to cut out factual history, you need some better explanation.
15:0315:03, 17 November 2016diffhist−145
Canaan
of course and you are STILL edit warring vs. consensus and rather lackadaisical vis-a-vis using "discussion page" here; I see no one but you who thinks Canaan is a "state" "established" (???) in the 16th century BC
12:2812:28, 17 November 2016diffhist−145
Canaan
WE can't say this is "state or territory established" in any particular century, this is precisely how vague estimates get petrified into solid viewpoints, all similar edits should be discussed first
16:2516:25, 14 October 2016diffhist−251
Abyla
copyedit & correct unidiomatic language, eg 'actual' does not mean 'current' in English as it does in French
12:0912:09, 19 September 2016diffhist−11
Gutian people
Move detailed para out of intro / lede into own section; rearrange more neutrally and with fewer "Howevers" in same paragraph
10:5310:53, 15 August 2016diffhist−58
Sumer
It is actually against site policy to go converting articles in normal BC format, into the abnormal and contentious BCE format
10:2110:21, 10 August 2016diffhist+122
Sumer
For future reference: If you spot vandalism, always revert to the last non-vandalized version rather than attempt to fix it by hand