16:5916:59, 19 June 2023diffhist−571
Padre Pio
Section only included one link and the website included no sourcing. Claims given also contradict what we know of Padre Pio from his personal secretary.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:0500:05, 11 December 2022diffhist−842
Mass of Paul VI
Undid revision 1126721071 by
Veverve (
talk) There are no sources cited at all here. Also, if your only issue is with the Eucharistic Prayers, then revise that section. Not everything I did.Tag: Undo
10 December 2022
20:1120:11, 10 December 2022diffhist−842
Mass of Paul VI
Undid revision 1126691398 by
Veverve (
talk) First, the section of changes that occured in recent decades is irrelevant to this article. The 1970 Missal introduced no alterations in that regard. Therefore, it makes no sense to include criticisms of something separate from the missal. Second, the original statements regarding Eucharistic Prayer II being of non-Roman origin have no citation. Third, you gave no reason for removing the image.Tags: UndoReverted
05:4805:48, 18 August 2022diffhist−537
Mass of Paul VI
→Vatican II, Sacrosanctum Concilium and a New Liturgy: Quote by Archbishop Bugnini was fake. It is instead a paraphrasing of a different quote from L’Osservatore Romano, 19 March 1965. The original quote is in reference to older changes to liturgical prayers for Good Friday. “The 7th prayer [of the new rite for Good Friday] bears the title: 'For the Unity of Christians' (not 'of the Church', which was always one.) No longer used is the pariah 'heretics' and 'schismatics' but 'all brethren...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
21:0421:04, 14 February 2022diffhist−7
Max Thurian
Original text indicated that the Protestants invited were allowed to participate in the reforms. This is false.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
16:5916:59, 19 June 2023diffhist−571
Padre Pio
Section only included one link and the website included no sourcing. Claims given also contradict what we know of Padre Pio from his personal secretary.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:0500:05, 11 December 2022diffhist−842
Mass of Paul VI
Undid revision 1126721071 by
Veverve (
talk) There are no sources cited at all here. Also, if your only issue is with the Eucharistic Prayers, then revise that section. Not everything I did.Tag: Undo
10 December 2022
20:1120:11, 10 December 2022diffhist−842
Mass of Paul VI
Undid revision 1126691398 by
Veverve (
talk) First, the section of changes that occured in recent decades is irrelevant to this article. The 1970 Missal introduced no alterations in that regard. Therefore, it makes no sense to include criticisms of something separate from the missal. Second, the original statements regarding Eucharistic Prayer II being of non-Roman origin have no citation. Third, you gave no reason for removing the image.Tags: UndoReverted
05:4805:48, 18 August 2022diffhist−537
Mass of Paul VI
→Vatican II, Sacrosanctum Concilium and a New Liturgy: Quote by Archbishop Bugnini was fake. It is instead a paraphrasing of a different quote from L’Osservatore Romano, 19 March 1965. The original quote is in reference to older changes to liturgical prayers for Good Friday. “The 7th prayer [of the new rite for Good Friday] bears the title: 'For the Unity of Christians' (not 'of the Church', which was always one.) No longer used is the pariah 'heretics' and 'schismatics' but 'all brethren...Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
21:0421:04, 14 February 2022diffhist−7
Max Thurian
Original text indicated that the Protestants invited were allowed to participate in the reforms. This is false.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit