19:4719:47, 25 September 2023diffhist+113
Open-ended
Undid revision 1177071520 by
GB fan (
talk) AGAIN let me state that open-ended evolution and open-endedness are two seperate things. The text in this page clearly shows this. Why remove knowledge and contrinute to false-knowledge in Wikipedia?.Tags: UndoReverted
11:5111:51, 25 September 2023diffhist+156
Open-endedness
Undid revision 1176936936 by
Kvng (
talk); If you check the history and references you see that it is not just "flawed article" but rather almost a random collections of references just to avoid deletion. The field of open-ended & open-endedness is large enough so one wouldn't have to bring fringe references.Tags: UndoReverted
19:5919:59, 18 September 2023diffhist+113
Open-ended
open-endedness is not identical to open-evolution. the previous user was mistaken to have made that change so i reverted back and added the two termsTag: Reverted
19:4719:47, 25 September 2023diffhist+113
Open-ended
Undid revision 1177071520 by
GB fan (
talk) AGAIN let me state that open-ended evolution and open-endedness are two seperate things. The text in this page clearly shows this. Why remove knowledge and contrinute to false-knowledge in Wikipedia?.Tags: UndoReverted
11:5111:51, 25 September 2023diffhist+156
Open-endedness
Undid revision 1176936936 by
Kvng (
talk); If you check the history and references you see that it is not just "flawed article" but rather almost a random collections of references just to avoid deletion. The field of open-ended & open-endedness is large enough so one wouldn't have to bring fringe references.Tags: UndoReverted
19:5919:59, 18 September 2023diffhist+113
Open-ended
open-endedness is not identical to open-evolution. the previous user was mistaken to have made that change so i reverted back and added the two termsTag: Reverted