02:0302:03, 31 October 2011diffhist+1,465
Brian Crowley
Undid revision 458121486 by
SnappyNote that
WP:UNDUE states "Keep in mind that, in determining proper weight, we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors.."
01:5301:53, 31 October 2011diffhist+790
Talk:Brian Crowley
An edit that is validly sourced to reliable references is relevant, if your viewpoint is different, provide counter edits, but do not delete on spurious grounds
02:0702:07, 21 April 2009diffhist+1,681
Brian Cowen
User:Snappy edits to "rm excessive quotes'", which have been present for a considerable period, removal of cited references is in breach of
NPOV and reverted accordingly
20:0920:09, 19 April 2009diffhist+314
Brian Cowen
User:Snappy is incorrect in citing
WP:Trivia guideline, which does not suggest the inclusion or exclusion of any information; it only gives style recommendations. Reverted accordingly.
18 April 2009
18:2818:28, 18 April 2009diffhist+314
Brian Cowen
User:Snappy describes accurately cited fact as "This rubbish keeps getting added". S/he is in breach of
NPOV by attempting to limit inclusion of known accurate facts relevant to personality
17 April 2009
22:3522:35, 17 April 2009diffhist+418
Brian Cowen
rv removal of material referenced on national television. Achieving national coverage on state broadcaster makes item noteable, removal is in breach of
NPOV
23:1623:16, 16 April 2009diffhist+418
Brian Cowen
Aspect of subject's personality noted on national television at least twice, is not trivial and reverted deletion accordingly
02:0302:03, 31 October 2011diffhist+1,465
Brian Crowley
Undid revision 458121486 by
SnappyNote that
WP:UNDUE states "Keep in mind that, in determining proper weight, we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors.."
01:5301:53, 31 October 2011diffhist+790
Talk:Brian Crowley
An edit that is validly sourced to reliable references is relevant, if your viewpoint is different, provide counter edits, but do not delete on spurious grounds
02:0702:07, 21 April 2009diffhist+1,681
Brian Cowen
User:Snappy edits to "rm excessive quotes'", which have been present for a considerable period, removal of cited references is in breach of
NPOV and reverted accordingly
20:0920:09, 19 April 2009diffhist+314
Brian Cowen
User:Snappy is incorrect in citing
WP:Trivia guideline, which does not suggest the inclusion or exclusion of any information; it only gives style recommendations. Reverted accordingly.
18 April 2009
18:2818:28, 18 April 2009diffhist+314
Brian Cowen
User:Snappy describes accurately cited fact as "This rubbish keeps getting added". S/he is in breach of
NPOV by attempting to limit inclusion of known accurate facts relevant to personality
17 April 2009
22:3522:35, 17 April 2009diffhist+418
Brian Cowen
rv removal of material referenced on national television. Achieving national coverage on state broadcaster makes item noteable, removal is in breach of
NPOV
23:1623:16, 16 April 2009diffhist+418
Brian Cowen
Aspect of subject's personality noted on national television at least twice, is not trivial and reverted deletion accordingly