03:0103:01, 16 October 2022diffhist−145
Sylvain Charlebois
The cross-appointment portion appears twice. I removed it from the lede section, since it’s a past appointment. The dean appointment also appears twice, but I believe it should be left in both sections given the prominence of the position.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
02:4902:49, 16 October 2022diffhist−1,374
Sylvain Charlebois
I did a further cleanup of the « studies » section. The new section focuses on the nature of the studies, and avoids making opinion-based claims about a particular topic (which seemed to strategically place with an agenda in mind). Overall, this section is still a bit weird, in the sense that it hand-picks studies from Charlebois’ dossier and promotes opinions.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
02:4102:41, 16 October 2022diffhist−231
Sylvain Charlebois
Another misleading statement. The steel food institute was founded by the arrell family foundation: https://arrellfoodinstitute.ca/the-arrell-family-foundation/ there is no mention of Charlebois in the history. The only source that mentioned Charlebois has a biography in his own page. There is no evidence that the Arrell institute was created by Charlebois. This statement should be removed until there is third-party evidenceTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
13 October 2022
12:4012:40, 13 October 2022diffhist−223
Glyphosate
The article never mentioned a broad consensus. It only mentions that there is conflicting research in favor and against glyphosateTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
21:5221:52, 11 October 2022diffhist0
Poutine
Corrected a minor grammatical error. Also, agree with the Charlebois revisión. The revision removed the promotional tone of the passage.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
15:5615:56, 11 October 2022diffhist−78
m
Poutine
Here we go again with Sylvain Charlebois trying to make publicity about his books on an article about poutine. The previous except reads like a publicitary stunt. We are talking about poutine in this page, not promoting Charlebois’ book. I changed the tone, keeping the referenceTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
05:2505:25, 5 October 2022diffhist−182
Farnham, Quebec
I insist in removing this edit, which was added by user:janvez, who is a confirmed sock master account, and one of his sockpuppets accounts. We have been cleaning all of the user’s edits through wiki, whose multiple accounts were blocked due to violating the regulations concerning BLP in Wikipedia.Tags: Manual revertRevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
03:0103:01, 16 October 2022diffhist−145
Sylvain Charlebois
The cross-appointment portion appears twice. I removed it from the lede section, since it’s a past appointment. The dean appointment also appears twice, but I believe it should be left in both sections given the prominence of the position.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
02:4902:49, 16 October 2022diffhist−1,374
Sylvain Charlebois
I did a further cleanup of the « studies » section. The new section focuses on the nature of the studies, and avoids making opinion-based claims about a particular topic (which seemed to strategically place with an agenda in mind). Overall, this section is still a bit weird, in the sense that it hand-picks studies from Charlebois’ dossier and promotes opinions.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
02:4102:41, 16 October 2022diffhist−231
Sylvain Charlebois
Another misleading statement. The steel food institute was founded by the arrell family foundation: https://arrellfoodinstitute.ca/the-arrell-family-foundation/ there is no mention of Charlebois in the history. The only source that mentioned Charlebois has a biography in his own page. There is no evidence that the Arrell institute was created by Charlebois. This statement should be removed until there is third-party evidenceTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
13 October 2022
12:4012:40, 13 October 2022diffhist−223
Glyphosate
The article never mentioned a broad consensus. It only mentions that there is conflicting research in favor and against glyphosateTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
21:5221:52, 11 October 2022diffhist0
Poutine
Corrected a minor grammatical error. Also, agree with the Charlebois revisión. The revision removed the promotional tone of the passage.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
15:5615:56, 11 October 2022diffhist−78
m
Poutine
Here we go again with Sylvain Charlebois trying to make publicity about his books on an article about poutine. The previous except reads like a publicitary stunt. We are talking about poutine in this page, not promoting Charlebois’ book. I changed the tone, keeping the referenceTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
05:2505:25, 5 October 2022diffhist−182
Farnham, Quebec
I insist in removing this edit, which was added by user:janvez, who is a confirmed sock master account, and one of his sockpuppets accounts. We have been cleaning all of the user’s edits through wiki, whose multiple accounts were blocked due to violating the regulations concerning BLP in Wikipedia.Tags: Manual revertRevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit