22:3922:39, 9 April 2024diffhist−29
Djong
Undid revision
1218131070 by
Onorem (
talk)I have another evidence to support my argument from chinese literature http://www.chinaknowledge.de/Literature/Science/lingwaidaida.htmlTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
20:3320:33, 9 April 2024diffhist+1
Djong
Undid revision
1218116011 by
Merzostin (
talk) you are the vandalism one. Am sure you already know the word Jung doesn't sound like chinese The word is known to China from Portuguese or Malay which comes from JavaneseTags: UndoMobile editMobile web edit
20:1820:18, 9 April 2024diffhist+1
Djong
Undid revision
1216429590 by
三葉草 (
talk) nope the word anddoesn't sound like Chinese. The word is known to China from Portuguese or Malay which comes from Javanese mbTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
19:5719:57, 9 April 2024diffhist+2,067
Djong
Undid revision
1216430174 by
Merzostin (
talk) nope it's say southern country not southern Chinese. I say againvarious sources say its a javenese ship who are dominan before 16-17 century. China are not seafaring people in mongol era the Chinese troop only have small ship and have hard time when invaded islands that are located far awayTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:2418:24, 4 March 2024diffhist+2,067
Djong
Undid revision 1187713004 by
Merzostin (
talk) various sources say its a javenese ship who are dominan before 16-17 century. China are not seafaring people in mongol era the Chinese troop only have small ship and have hard time when invaded islands that are located far awayTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:5614:56, 6 August 2022diffhist−101
Mataram Kingdom
is unref and possibly is just your assertion..? Lol it is related from primary sources. So do you think bias assumptions from news media 1000 years later are more accurate than primary sources?? primary sources/history: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_sourceTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
5 August 2022
15:0515:05, 5 August 2022diffhist−112
Mataram Kingdom
Primary sources are documents, images or artifacts that provide firsthand testimony or direct evidence. Primary sources are original documents created or experienced contemporaneously with the event being researched. From the Pucangan inscription, we know that Sriwijaya is not mentioned there, so why you use assumptions reff from News Media which are not related to primary sources?Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
22:3922:39, 9 April 2024diffhist−29
Djong
Undid revision
1218131070 by
Onorem (
talk)I have another evidence to support my argument from chinese literature http://www.chinaknowledge.de/Literature/Science/lingwaidaida.htmlTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
20:3320:33, 9 April 2024diffhist+1
Djong
Undid revision
1218116011 by
Merzostin (
talk) you are the vandalism one. Am sure you already know the word Jung doesn't sound like chinese The word is known to China from Portuguese or Malay which comes from JavaneseTags: UndoMobile editMobile web edit
20:1820:18, 9 April 2024diffhist+1
Djong
Undid revision
1216429590 by
三葉草 (
talk) nope the word anddoesn't sound like Chinese. The word is known to China from Portuguese or Malay which comes from Javanese mbTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
19:5719:57, 9 April 2024diffhist+2,067
Djong
Undid revision
1216430174 by
Merzostin (
talk) nope it's say southern country not southern Chinese. I say againvarious sources say its a javenese ship who are dominan before 16-17 century. China are not seafaring people in mongol era the Chinese troop only have small ship and have hard time when invaded islands that are located far awayTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:2418:24, 4 March 2024diffhist+2,067
Djong
Undid revision 1187713004 by
Merzostin (
talk) various sources say its a javenese ship who are dominan before 16-17 century. China are not seafaring people in mongol era the Chinese troop only have small ship and have hard time when invaded islands that are located far awayTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:5614:56, 6 August 2022diffhist−101
Mataram Kingdom
is unref and possibly is just your assertion..? Lol it is related from primary sources. So do you think bias assumptions from news media 1000 years later are more accurate than primary sources?? primary sources/history: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_sourceTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
5 August 2022
15:0515:05, 5 August 2022diffhist−112
Mataram Kingdom
Primary sources are documents, images or artifacts that provide firsthand testimony or direct evidence. Primary sources are original documents created or experienced contemporaneously with the event being researched. From the Pucangan inscription, we know that Sriwijaya is not mentioned there, so why you use assumptions reff from News Media which are not related to primary sources?Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit