00:4800:48, 6 February 2021diffhist−638
Active record pattern
One of these references does not resolve, one is literally a Stack Exchange question, one is some dude's blog, and the O'Reilly link barely has any context. It is not an appropriate comment for the start of the article without. Please see
WP:NPOV. It is not "Currently regarded as an anti-pattern", at best you could say it is currently regarded as an anti-pattern _by some_.Tag: Undo
00:4800:48, 6 February 2021diffhist−638
Active record pattern
One of these references does not resolve, one is literally a Stack Exchange question, one is some dude's blog, and the O'Reilly link barely has any context. It is not an appropriate comment for the start of the article without. Please see
WP:NPOV. It is not "Currently regarded as an anti-pattern", at best you could say it is currently regarded as an anti-pattern _by some_.Tag: Undo