14:0414:04, 3 March 2021diffhist+775
Rising Sun Flag
Undid revision 1010035195 by
NettingFish15019 (
talk) Edit summary was only half-filled. Meant to say there seems to be much discussion after your own comment, which states "you cant just unilaterally assert a consensus has been reached when none has been". Per WP:NOCON, the version before the dispute should be retained (the one with the lede). Regardless, it seems most editors are in favor of retaining the lede.Tags: UndoReverted
13:5813:58, 3 March 2021diffhist+775
Rising Sun Flag
Undid revision 1009980834 by
XiAdonis (
talk) There seems to be much discussion after your own comment, which states "you cant just unilaterally assert a consensus has been reached when none has beenTags: UndoReverted
12:3812:38, 1 March 2021diffhist−39
Free North Korea Radio
Undid revision 1009586689 by
Daiichi1 (
talk) Nowhere in the article does it suggest the broadcaster is a creator of propaganda. If you can find a source to back it up, feel free to add it to the article and then re-add the category.Tag: Undo
15:4215:42, 27 February 2021diffhist+418
Gimbap
Undid revision 1009248951 by
Daiichi1 (
talk) If you look at the definition for 'minority view' on the WP page, it links to 'fringe theory'. But more to the point, there are ample sources here that lend support to both theories, as already discussed in the talk page, which suggests neither are 'fringe theories'; getting rid of any leading language is necessary to maintain WP:BALANCE and WP:IMPARTIAL.Tags: UndoReverted
14:5414:54, 27 February 2021diffhist+452
Gimbap
Undid revision 1009236721 by
Daiichi1 (
talk) It's not WP:FALSEBALANCE, which only applies to fringe theories; a simple google alone shows that the origins are up to debate and some controversy. The talkpage for this site has already undergone ample discussion on which theory is 'better'. The revision doesn't endorse either theory, but just lists them in line with WP:NPOV (specifically WP:BALANCE and WP:IMPARTIAL).Tag: Undo
10:3310:33, 27 February 2021diffhist+452
Gimbap
→Etymology: Reworded to prevent mentions of 'the most accepted theory' as was previously applied to both the 'Japanese colonial' and 'bokssam' theory in this article. I think it would be better for WP:NPOV. Added sources, and deleted a source which didn't support the previous statement.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
02:5802:58, 23 February 2021diffhist−763
Comfort women
Undid revision 1008393962 by
Bavio the Benighted (
talk) Onus is on those who want to include it to get consensus (WP:ONUS); without it, the content should be removed. This talk has been inactive for about a week; please stop beating the dead horse (WP:DEADHORSE).Tag: Undo
03:4403:44, 19 February 2021diffhist+2,746
Korea under Japanese rule
Undid revision 1007448679 by
XiAdonis (
talk) Undid deletion of substantial portions from the section, though left the deletion of the reference to Sankei as the user did. Wording in the portions restored corresponds to the sources cited.Tag: Undo
10:3510:35, 10 February 2021diffhist−1,375
Malaysia–South Korea relations
Undid revision 1005783448 by
Yasuo Miyakawa (
talk) No indication that this led to any lasting consequences (seems singular. See WP:Recentism). It also doesn't seem to improve the article as a whole, especially to warrant its own section (See WP:ONUS and WP:UNDUE).Tag: Undo
14:0414:04, 3 March 2021diffhist+775
Rising Sun Flag
Undid revision 1010035195 by
NettingFish15019 (
talk) Edit summary was only half-filled. Meant to say there seems to be much discussion after your own comment, which states "you cant just unilaterally assert a consensus has been reached when none has been". Per WP:NOCON, the version before the dispute should be retained (the one with the lede). Regardless, it seems most editors are in favor of retaining the lede.Tags: UndoReverted
13:5813:58, 3 March 2021diffhist+775
Rising Sun Flag
Undid revision 1009980834 by
XiAdonis (
talk) There seems to be much discussion after your own comment, which states "you cant just unilaterally assert a consensus has been reached when none has beenTags: UndoReverted
12:3812:38, 1 March 2021diffhist−39
Free North Korea Radio
Undid revision 1009586689 by
Daiichi1 (
talk) Nowhere in the article does it suggest the broadcaster is a creator of propaganda. If you can find a source to back it up, feel free to add it to the article and then re-add the category.Tag: Undo
15:4215:42, 27 February 2021diffhist+418
Gimbap
Undid revision 1009248951 by
Daiichi1 (
talk) If you look at the definition for 'minority view' on the WP page, it links to 'fringe theory'. But more to the point, there are ample sources here that lend support to both theories, as already discussed in the talk page, which suggests neither are 'fringe theories'; getting rid of any leading language is necessary to maintain WP:BALANCE and WP:IMPARTIAL.Tags: UndoReverted
14:5414:54, 27 February 2021diffhist+452
Gimbap
Undid revision 1009236721 by
Daiichi1 (
talk) It's not WP:FALSEBALANCE, which only applies to fringe theories; a simple google alone shows that the origins are up to debate and some controversy. The talkpage for this site has already undergone ample discussion on which theory is 'better'. The revision doesn't endorse either theory, but just lists them in line with WP:NPOV (specifically WP:BALANCE and WP:IMPARTIAL).Tag: Undo
10:3310:33, 27 February 2021diffhist+452
Gimbap
→Etymology: Reworded to prevent mentions of 'the most accepted theory' as was previously applied to both the 'Japanese colonial' and 'bokssam' theory in this article. I think it would be better for WP:NPOV. Added sources, and deleted a source which didn't support the previous statement.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
02:5802:58, 23 February 2021diffhist−763
Comfort women
Undid revision 1008393962 by
Bavio the Benighted (
talk) Onus is on those who want to include it to get consensus (WP:ONUS); without it, the content should be removed. This talk has been inactive for about a week; please stop beating the dead horse (WP:DEADHORSE).Tag: Undo
03:4403:44, 19 February 2021diffhist+2,746
Korea under Japanese rule
Undid revision 1007448679 by
XiAdonis (
talk) Undid deletion of substantial portions from the section, though left the deletion of the reference to Sankei as the user did. Wording in the portions restored corresponds to the sources cited.Tag: Undo
10:3510:35, 10 February 2021diffhist−1,375
Malaysia–South Korea relations
Undid revision 1005783448 by
Yasuo Miyakawa (
talk) No indication that this led to any lasting consequences (seems singular. See WP:Recentism). It also doesn't seem to improve the article as a whole, especially to warrant its own section (See WP:ONUS and WP:UNDUE).Tag: Undo