08:0908:09, 26 September 2022diffhist+4,210
Fizeau experiment
→Controversy: Re-wrote disputed section with much more context (as promised) Article now comes to exact same conclusions and *better explains the process of how controversy in prior art led directly to relativity, but does so without the consistent bias towards Stachel's interpretation of German (and misrepresentation of well established wave mechanics)
08:2008:20, 24 September 2022diffhist+1,448
Fizeau experiment
→Controversy: Editorializing and opinion about the consensus at the time requires citation. His "dissatisfaction" is not "easily discerned" Historian's fallacy seems to be infecting the page editors here. Earlier quote in same paper added for context. Relativistic theory, however, was developed in aether long before Einstein, as historians such as Statchel well know.(Poincare's work was aether and preferred frame based) Longer quotes are required to remove article's historian fallacy biasTag: Reverted
07:0807:08, 24 September 2022diffhist+85
Fizeau experiment
→Fresnel drag coefficient: Editorializing and WP:SYNTHESIS removed. Inferred global preference of partial vs full aether drag in scientific community has no basis. Cleaned up confusing description of aether drag. ("overcoming resistance" was completely inappropriate)Tag: Reverted
03:0103:01, 24 September 2022diffhist+299
Fringe shift
Readability + Clarification of how non-mechanical vs mechanical conception of light alters modern vs contemporary understanding of the experiment and the shifting of fringes
02:1402:14, 24 September 2022diffhist+211
Fizeau experiment
Undid revision 1111887693 by
Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog Only "apparently original" to you. Ignorance isn't a sin, it's an inescapable fact of being a human. So yes, let's chat on talk page without removing my work. If others decide they can't understand basic - well known - consequences of wave phenomena in the linked articles too, then we'll remove it.Tags: UndoReverted
05:3605:36, 16 September 2022diffhist+3,524
Fringe shift
→Discovery: User "PointedEars" edit below literally created a historian's fallacy while believing they were correcting one. Thus a differentiation between modern and historical perspective of fringe shift is required.
08:0908:09, 26 September 2022diffhist+4,210
Fizeau experiment
→Controversy: Re-wrote disputed section with much more context (as promised) Article now comes to exact same conclusions and *better explains the process of how controversy in prior art led directly to relativity, but does so without the consistent bias towards Stachel's interpretation of German (and misrepresentation of well established wave mechanics)
08:2008:20, 24 September 2022diffhist+1,448
Fizeau experiment
→Controversy: Editorializing and opinion about the consensus at the time requires citation. His "dissatisfaction" is not "easily discerned" Historian's fallacy seems to be infecting the page editors here. Earlier quote in same paper added for context. Relativistic theory, however, was developed in aether long before Einstein, as historians such as Statchel well know.(Poincare's work was aether and preferred frame based) Longer quotes are required to remove article's historian fallacy biasTag: Reverted
07:0807:08, 24 September 2022diffhist+85
Fizeau experiment
→Fresnel drag coefficient: Editorializing and WP:SYNTHESIS removed. Inferred global preference of partial vs full aether drag in scientific community has no basis. Cleaned up confusing description of aether drag. ("overcoming resistance" was completely inappropriate)Tag: Reverted
03:0103:01, 24 September 2022diffhist+299
Fringe shift
Readability + Clarification of how non-mechanical vs mechanical conception of light alters modern vs contemporary understanding of the experiment and the shifting of fringes
02:1402:14, 24 September 2022diffhist+211
Fizeau experiment
Undid revision 1111887693 by
Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog Only "apparently original" to you. Ignorance isn't a sin, it's an inescapable fact of being a human. So yes, let's chat on talk page without removing my work. If others decide they can't understand basic - well known - consequences of wave phenomena in the linked articles too, then we'll remove it.Tags: UndoReverted
05:3605:36, 16 September 2022diffhist+3,524
Fringe shift
→Discovery: User "PointedEars" edit below literally created a historian's fallacy while believing they were correcting one. Thus a differentiation between modern and historical perspective of fringe shift is required.