05:0705:07, 8 October 2013diffhist+17
Rupert Sheldrake
If you're going to revert to "more closely follows the source", why not use the word the source used? Plus, "Pseudoscientific" more closely matches the source. Note the "-ific" suffix forming an adjective -- making English language readable.
05:0705:07, 8 October 2013diffhist+17
Rupert Sheldrake
If you're going to revert to "more closely follows the source", why not use the word the source used? Plus, "Pseudoscientific" more closely matches the source. Note the "-ific" suffix forming an adjective -- making English language readable.