09:2109:21, 20 January 2019diffhist−141
Dash
→top: Restore recently changed wording in lead. Either dash can be used here. Source not needed either, and misleading anyway as only relates to emdash. Better sourcing already there in main body
16:3116:31, 2 June 2018diffhist−1,595
Seumas Milne
Is he an expert on Seumas Milne though, the actual topic of the page? Also your blanket revert reversed other changes for no apparent reason. As noted, please read and use the talk page. ThanksTag: Undo
09:3609:36, 2 June 2018diffhist−909
Seumas Milne
Undid revision 843944771 See talk, where most people seem to accept that, yes, we do not stuff BLPs with every obscure piece of random, speculative, politically motivated criticismTag: Undo
10:0810:08, 26 May 2018diffhist−909
Seumas Milne
Perhaps to a debate about Russia, if you're going to cite partisan mud-slinging as part of it, but not to a factual biography of Milne. There's a talk page section about thisTag: Undo
21:3721:37, 24 May 2018diffhist−963
Seumas Milne
Rvt to pre-PC changes. A lot more of the commentary here needs to be removed to stop this being a pointless attack page rather than a bio actually explaining who Milne is and what he thinks
13:2213:22, 8 April 2018diffhist−50
Matt Taibbi
→The eXile: Belatedly removing this clear piece of OR interpretation/comment. It's now 3 v 1 pointing out that this goes beyond what is explicitly in source. No consensus to keep
14:3814:38, 1 January 2018diffhist−46
Matt Taibbi
→The eXile: That is not "playing it straight", but interpretation added in WP's voice. The article says nothing about "other harassment" or Taibbi not apologising for its
29 December 2017
14:1714:17, 29 December 2017diffhist+15
Max Boot
The "neoconservative" label, by contrast, is not uncontroversial. And even if he is one, he is also a conservative, so let's stick with that broader and more widely acknowledged one
22:0422:04, 28 December 2017diffhist−312
Matt Taibbi
Disagree on both counts: simply saying "describe[s]" suggests veracity; quote is totally undue and marginal, and controversy re Taibbi himself is perfectly well explained without it. Talk page to carry this on thanks
10:3710:37, 28 December 2017diffhist−98
Max Boot
Although on reflection not sure this one-off quote, originally buried in random op-ed, needs to be highlighted as second point in lead
10:2310:23, 28 December 2017diffhist−66
Max Boot
→top: Rm "American values" from lead. Literally do not know what that means, and if it means anything, it presumably is covered by what the next sentence says anyway re "ideals"
10:1910:19, 28 December 2017diffhist−404
Matt Taibbi
Sorry, but that edit reverted some copyediting and removal of duplication. Not clear that quote is needed or adds much either
09:2109:21, 20 January 2019diffhist−141
Dash
→top: Restore recently changed wording in lead. Either dash can be used here. Source not needed either, and misleading anyway as only relates to emdash. Better sourcing already there in main body
16:3116:31, 2 June 2018diffhist−1,595
Seumas Milne
Is he an expert on Seumas Milne though, the actual topic of the page? Also your blanket revert reversed other changes for no apparent reason. As noted, please read and use the talk page. ThanksTag: Undo
09:3609:36, 2 June 2018diffhist−909
Seumas Milne
Undid revision 843944771 See talk, where most people seem to accept that, yes, we do not stuff BLPs with every obscure piece of random, speculative, politically motivated criticismTag: Undo
10:0810:08, 26 May 2018diffhist−909
Seumas Milne
Perhaps to a debate about Russia, if you're going to cite partisan mud-slinging as part of it, but not to a factual biography of Milne. There's a talk page section about thisTag: Undo
21:3721:37, 24 May 2018diffhist−963
Seumas Milne
Rvt to pre-PC changes. A lot more of the commentary here needs to be removed to stop this being a pointless attack page rather than a bio actually explaining who Milne is and what he thinks
13:2213:22, 8 April 2018diffhist−50
Matt Taibbi
→The eXile: Belatedly removing this clear piece of OR interpretation/comment. It's now 3 v 1 pointing out that this goes beyond what is explicitly in source. No consensus to keep
14:3814:38, 1 January 2018diffhist−46
Matt Taibbi
→The eXile: That is not "playing it straight", but interpretation added in WP's voice. The article says nothing about "other harassment" or Taibbi not apologising for its
29 December 2017
14:1714:17, 29 December 2017diffhist+15
Max Boot
The "neoconservative" label, by contrast, is not uncontroversial. And even if he is one, he is also a conservative, so let's stick with that broader and more widely acknowledged one
22:0422:04, 28 December 2017diffhist−312
Matt Taibbi
Disagree on both counts: simply saying "describe[s]" suggests veracity; quote is totally undue and marginal, and controversy re Taibbi himself is perfectly well explained without it. Talk page to carry this on thanks
10:3710:37, 28 December 2017diffhist−98
Max Boot
Although on reflection not sure this one-off quote, originally buried in random op-ed, needs to be highlighted as second point in lead
10:2310:23, 28 December 2017diffhist−66
Max Boot
→top: Rm "American values" from lead. Literally do not know what that means, and if it means anything, it presumably is covered by what the next sentence says anyway re "ideals"
10:1910:19, 28 December 2017diffhist−404
Matt Taibbi
Sorry, but that edit reverted some copyediting and removal of duplication. Not clear that quote is needed or adds much either