22:4422:44, 13 October 2021diffhist−472
Somnath temple
→History: rm gross misrepresentation added by Kautilya3 again: I do not understand what is the hurry or obsession with adding this misinformation even when Kautilya3 cannot show where "Historians" or "minimal damage" is supported; revise it to a draft – but bit revised – discussed on the talk page; remove more misrepresentations about wooden temple in Mahmud's time: that is not what the source states; delete another misrepresentation here; add
18:1518:15, 7 October 2021diffhist+1,415
Somnath temple
expand, add sources; I checked the cited source in the old-legacy-version for the 15th-century subsection but it failed verification; I have replaced it with summary from other sources
15:3115:31, 7 October 2021diffhist+452
Khafi Khan
→Legacy: Haq's translation is common in Truschke; others have used Sarkar; Haq and Sarkar have their respective bias; in the last sentence 'cites' is perhaps the more neutral word
11:4411:44, 7 October 2021diffhist+711
Kumarapala (Chaulukya dynasty)
mention that Jaina texts are highly inconsistent about Kumarapala, something earlier editors of this article have accurately summarized; add a bit about the inscriptions in the "sources of info" section
11:3011:30, 7 October 2021diffhist+2,364
Kumarapala (Chaulukya dynasty)
update for NPOV, expand, add sources (I will try to come back to this article later, as this seems too dependent on a single Majumdar source who is summarizing Jain texts; there is much on Kumarapala in peer reviewed scholarship)
18:4718:47, 6 October 2021diffhist+566
Khafi Khan
provide quote and a note; per past community discussions, counting in a source and stating the count when it can be verified is welcome and meets WP:NOR
18:1518:15, 6 October 2021diffhist+161
Somnath temple
odd we have no separate article on the exquisite Tejpal/Luna Vasahi Jain temple or others in Dilwara, we should; linking to Dilwara for now as the ruin photographs show Somnath artwork looked like it
22:4422:44, 13 October 2021diffhist−472
Somnath temple
→History: rm gross misrepresentation added by Kautilya3 again: I do not understand what is the hurry or obsession with adding this misinformation even when Kautilya3 cannot show where "Historians" or "minimal damage" is supported; revise it to a draft – but bit revised – discussed on the talk page; remove more misrepresentations about wooden temple in Mahmud's time: that is not what the source states; delete another misrepresentation here; add
18:1518:15, 7 October 2021diffhist+1,415
Somnath temple
expand, add sources; I checked the cited source in the old-legacy-version for the 15th-century subsection but it failed verification; I have replaced it with summary from other sources
15:3115:31, 7 October 2021diffhist+452
Khafi Khan
→Legacy: Haq's translation is common in Truschke; others have used Sarkar; Haq and Sarkar have their respective bias; in the last sentence 'cites' is perhaps the more neutral word
11:4411:44, 7 October 2021diffhist+711
Kumarapala (Chaulukya dynasty)
mention that Jaina texts are highly inconsistent about Kumarapala, something earlier editors of this article have accurately summarized; add a bit about the inscriptions in the "sources of info" section
11:3011:30, 7 October 2021diffhist+2,364
Kumarapala (Chaulukya dynasty)
update for NPOV, expand, add sources (I will try to come back to this article later, as this seems too dependent on a single Majumdar source who is summarizing Jain texts; there is much on Kumarapala in peer reviewed scholarship)
18:4718:47, 6 October 2021diffhist+566
Khafi Khan
provide quote and a note; per past community discussions, counting in a source and stating the count when it can be verified is welcome and meets WP:NOR
18:1518:15, 6 October 2021diffhist+161
Somnath temple
odd we have no separate article on the exquisite Tejpal/Luna Vasahi Jain temple or others in Dilwara, we should; linking to Dilwara for now as the ruin photographs show Somnath artwork looked like it