A user with 28 edits. Account created on 20 May 2018.
22 April 2020
05:5205:52, 22 April 2020diffhist−138
Psychopathy Checklist
The cited source is not a professional assessment but rather a polemic embedded in highly speculative narrative. It is therefore a citation that falls below the quality standard.Tag: Visual edit
16:0516:05, 4 November 2019diffhist+20
m
Fig
→In religion and mythology: The term "female sexuality" is overly general to the point that it is likely too be too unsubstantial to be able to credibly cite in terms of its claimed suppression in history, without a more specific definition for which an example can be given in regard to its suppression (which no doubt it can be for more specific definitions). However, if an editor wishes to stick with this general term than, regardless, a citation is needed for its historical suppression.Tag: Visual edit
22:4222:42, 26 November 2018diffhist−499
Goths
deleted for unintelligible style that makes for utterly confusing content. The content is likely unsalvageable without a better source translation (assuming this was machine translated).Tag: Visual edit
22 November 2018
17:3717:37, 22 November 2018diffhist−11
m
Abraham
I changed "Jewish people" to "Israel", to reflect the content in the source material (the Tanakh / Old Testament) for the mythology in question. Implying that the covenant was between only Judah, at the point of Abraham's existence, is inaccurate. The concept of the "Jewish people" as a remaining covenant group did not exist at the time of the initial covenant. They existed as one of many tribes that comprised Israel. Israel was only later scattered after the Assyrian captivity.Tag: Visual edit
15:4415:44, 27 May 2018diffhist−140
God in Christianity
Its an invalid method to use explicitly ecumenical sources, which are inherently biased toward a syncretic perspective that can and do often include new theology, to cite the beliefs of early Christianity. Both sources are ecumenical. On the amazon page of the Dictionary: "The editorial perspective of the Global Dictionary of Theology is an ecumenical evangelicalism that is receptive to discovering new facets of truth through listening and conversation on a global scale".Tag: Visual edit
24 May 2018
05:5705:57, 24 May 2018diffhist−95
Baal
Its not "pointing out a parallel" when the article's language isn't clear as to the difference between where and when the cited terminology was used. Linking is not good enough. The writing is sloppy, as the lack of a differing cultural designations implies that Adonai and Bel were used in the Canaanite religion. Its also not my job to fix that. I deleted both the references to Bel and Adonai. Feel free to revert, but please fix the writing so that the article remains clear and is thus useful.Tag: Visual edit
20 May 2018
14:4814:48, 20 May 2018diffhist−47
Baal
I removed the statement "Adonai for Yahweh", as including this under the Hadad subsection and in the same sentence for a description of how "Bel" was used for the deity Marduk, implies that Yahweh was referred to Adonai in the Semetic Polytheistic religion. A conflation of the Canaanite and Judaic religions should be avoided. Any references to Yahweh being referred to Adonai should be clear that the time and place of this appellation refers to Judaic culture.Tag: Visual edit
A user with 28 edits. Account created on 20 May 2018.
22 April 2020
05:5205:52, 22 April 2020diffhist−138
Psychopathy Checklist
The cited source is not a professional assessment but rather a polemic embedded in highly speculative narrative. It is therefore a citation that falls below the quality standard.Tag: Visual edit
16:0516:05, 4 November 2019diffhist+20
m
Fig
→In religion and mythology: The term "female sexuality" is overly general to the point that it is likely too be too unsubstantial to be able to credibly cite in terms of its claimed suppression in history, without a more specific definition for which an example can be given in regard to its suppression (which no doubt it can be for more specific definitions). However, if an editor wishes to stick with this general term than, regardless, a citation is needed for its historical suppression.Tag: Visual edit
22:4222:42, 26 November 2018diffhist−499
Goths
deleted for unintelligible style that makes for utterly confusing content. The content is likely unsalvageable without a better source translation (assuming this was machine translated).Tag: Visual edit
22 November 2018
17:3717:37, 22 November 2018diffhist−11
m
Abraham
I changed "Jewish people" to "Israel", to reflect the content in the source material (the Tanakh / Old Testament) for the mythology in question. Implying that the covenant was between only Judah, at the point of Abraham's existence, is inaccurate. The concept of the "Jewish people" as a remaining covenant group did not exist at the time of the initial covenant. They existed as one of many tribes that comprised Israel. Israel was only later scattered after the Assyrian captivity.Tag: Visual edit
15:4415:44, 27 May 2018diffhist−140
God in Christianity
Its an invalid method to use explicitly ecumenical sources, which are inherently biased toward a syncretic perspective that can and do often include new theology, to cite the beliefs of early Christianity. Both sources are ecumenical. On the amazon page of the Dictionary: "The editorial perspective of the Global Dictionary of Theology is an ecumenical evangelicalism that is receptive to discovering new facets of truth through listening and conversation on a global scale".Tag: Visual edit
24 May 2018
05:5705:57, 24 May 2018diffhist−95
Baal
Its not "pointing out a parallel" when the article's language isn't clear as to the difference between where and when the cited terminology was used. Linking is not good enough. The writing is sloppy, as the lack of a differing cultural designations implies that Adonai and Bel were used in the Canaanite religion. Its also not my job to fix that. I deleted both the references to Bel and Adonai. Feel free to revert, but please fix the writing so that the article remains clear and is thus useful.Tag: Visual edit
20 May 2018
14:4814:48, 20 May 2018diffhist−47
Baal
I removed the statement "Adonai for Yahweh", as including this under the Hadad subsection and in the same sentence for a description of how "Bel" was used for the deity Marduk, implies that Yahweh was referred to Adonai in the Semetic Polytheistic religion. A conflation of the Canaanite and Judaic religions should be avoided. Any references to Yahweh being referred to Adonai should be clear that the time and place of this appellation refers to Judaic culture.Tag: Visual edit