A user with 28 edits. Account created on 20 May 2018.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

22 April 2020

20 February 2020

4 November 2019

  • 16:05 16:05, 4 November 2019 diff hist +20 m Fig →‎In religion and mythology: The term "female sexuality" is overly general to the point that it is likely too be too unsubstantial to be able to credibly cite in terms of its claimed suppression in history, without a more specific definition for which an example can be given in regard to its suppression (which no doubt it can be for more specific definitions). However, if an editor wishes to stick with this general term than, regardless, a citation is needed for its historical suppression. Tag: Visual edit

30 June 2019

28 November 2018

26 November 2018

22 November 2018

  • 17:37 17:37, 22 November 2018 diff hist −11 m AbrahamI changed "Jewish people" to "Israel", to reflect the content in the source material (the Tanakh / Old Testament) for the mythology in question. Implying that the covenant was between only Judah, at the point of Abraham's existence, is inaccurate. The concept of the "Jewish people" as a remaining covenant group did not exist at the time of the initial covenant. They existed as one of many tribes that comprised Israel. Israel was only later scattered after the Assyrian captivity. Tag: Visual edit

24 September 2018

9 June 2018

27 May 2018

24 May 2018

  • 05:57 05:57, 24 May 2018 diff hist −95 BaalIts not "pointing out a parallel" when the article's language isn't clear as to the difference between where and when the cited terminology was used. Linking is not good enough. The writing is sloppy, as the lack of a differing cultural designations implies that Adonai and Bel were used in the Canaanite religion. Its also not my job to fix that. I deleted both the references to Bel and Adonai. Feel free to revert, but please fix the writing so that the article remains clear and is thus useful. Tag: Visual edit

20 May 2018

  • 14:48 14:48, 20 May 2018 diff hist −47 BaalI removed the statement "Adonai for Yahweh", as including this under the Hadad subsection and in the same sentence for a description of how "Bel" was used for the deity Marduk, implies that Yahweh was referred to Adonai in the Semetic Polytheistic religion. A conflation of the Canaanite and Judaic religions should be avoided. Any references to Yahweh being referred to Adonai should be clear that the time and place of this appellation refers to Judaic culture. Tag: Visual edit
A user with 28 edits. Account created on 20 May 2018.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

22 April 2020

20 February 2020

4 November 2019

  • 16:05 16:05, 4 November 2019 diff hist +20 m Fig →‎In religion and mythology: The term "female sexuality" is overly general to the point that it is likely too be too unsubstantial to be able to credibly cite in terms of its claimed suppression in history, without a more specific definition for which an example can be given in regard to its suppression (which no doubt it can be for more specific definitions). However, if an editor wishes to stick with this general term than, regardless, a citation is needed for its historical suppression. Tag: Visual edit

30 June 2019

28 November 2018

26 November 2018

22 November 2018

  • 17:37 17:37, 22 November 2018 diff hist −11 m AbrahamI changed "Jewish people" to "Israel", to reflect the content in the source material (the Tanakh / Old Testament) for the mythology in question. Implying that the covenant was between only Judah, at the point of Abraham's existence, is inaccurate. The concept of the "Jewish people" as a remaining covenant group did not exist at the time of the initial covenant. They existed as one of many tribes that comprised Israel. Israel was only later scattered after the Assyrian captivity. Tag: Visual edit

24 September 2018

9 June 2018

27 May 2018

24 May 2018

  • 05:57 05:57, 24 May 2018 diff hist −95 BaalIts not "pointing out a parallel" when the article's language isn't clear as to the difference between where and when the cited terminology was used. Linking is not good enough. The writing is sloppy, as the lack of a differing cultural designations implies that Adonai and Bel were used in the Canaanite religion. Its also not my job to fix that. I deleted both the references to Bel and Adonai. Feel free to revert, but please fix the writing so that the article remains clear and is thus useful. Tag: Visual edit

20 May 2018

  • 14:48 14:48, 20 May 2018 diff hist −47 BaalI removed the statement "Adonai for Yahweh", as including this under the Hadad subsection and in the same sentence for a description of how "Bel" was used for the deity Marduk, implies that Yahweh was referred to Adonai in the Semetic Polytheistic religion. A conflation of the Canaanite and Judaic religions should be avoided. Any references to Yahweh being referred to Adonai should be clear that the time and place of this appellation refers to Judaic culture. Tag: Visual edit

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook