A user with 43 edits. Account created on 1 January 2022.
24 July 2022
- 22:11 22:11, 24 July 2022 diff hist +291 m Manchester changed grammer Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 22:08 22:08, 24 July 2022 diff hist +118 Manchester No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 22:06 22:06, 24 July 2022 diff hist +24 Talk:Manchester No edit summary Tag: Reverted
7 July 2022
- 20:00 20:00, 7 July 2022 diff hist +436 m Manchester Undid revision 1096341220 by Cordless Larry ( talk) Take to talk Tag: Undo
3 July 2022
- 20:44 20:44, 3 July 2022 diff hist +436 m Manchester Undid revision 1096108533 by DragonofBatley ( talk) References indicate Manchester is a major city. If you undo again, I will report you for vandalism. Tags: Undo Reverted
2 July 2022
- 08:31 08:31, 2 July 2022 diff hist +2 m BBC News minor edit to header, spelling and grammer Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:31 08:31, 2 July 2022 diff hist +24 m BBC News edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:30 08:30, 2 July 2022 diff hist +369 m BBC News edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:28 08:28, 2 July 2022 diff hist +436 m Manchester edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:26 08:26, 2 July 2022 diff hist −560 m Birmingham edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
10 February 2022
- 18:50 18:50, 10 February 2022 diff hist +1,713 Manchester Undid revision 1070688565 by Shearonink ( talk) I notice you have not deleted the same phrase from the Birmingham article. Before taking unilateral action, please consult the talk page. Thanks Tag: Undo
8 February 2022
- 18:48 18:48, 8 February 2022 diff hist +1,713 Manchester Undid revision 1069973988 by Stevo1000 ( talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
26 January 2022
- 10:57 10:57, 26 January 2022 diff hist −151 m Birmingham corrected a pop stat for urban area that was incorrect Tag: Visual edit
- 10:56 10:56, 26 January 2022 diff hist +244 Birmingham minor change to the lead paragraph correcting data and adding a source. Tag: Visual edit
12 January 2022
- 17:59 17:59, 12 January 2022 diff hist +896 Birmingham Reverted changes made to the lead paragraph regarding second city status. NOTICE TO EDITORS, an agreement was establish per an RfC whereby this clause was to be added unless the phrase regarding Birmingham second city status was to be removed. An agreement was reached whereby we apply this disputed phrase at the end the sentence in both Manchester and Birmingham articles. If you have an issue with this agreement, then take to the talk place and reach consensus before making unilateral changes. Tag: Visual edit
10 January 2022
- 19:00 19:00, 10 January 2022 diff hist 0 Economy of Europe No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
8 January 2022
- 22:25 22:25, 8 January 2022 diff hist +303 Manchester Added citation for phrase. Tag: Visual edit
- 22:21 22:21, 8 January 2022 diff hist −48 Manchester Matched the phrased used for the Birmingham article for consistency as the entire sentence has a intertwined editorial agreement for both articles. Tag: Visual edit
7 January 2022
- 23:19 23:19, 7 January 2022 diff hist +20 Manchester No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 23:18 23:18, 7 January 2022 diff hist +97 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 23:17 23:17, 7 January 2022 diff hist +125 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 23:16 23:16, 7 January 2022 diff hist −5 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 23:15 23:15, 7 January 2022 diff hist +314 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:33 13:33, 7 January 2022 diff hist +10 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:33 13:33, 7 January 2022 diff hist +47 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:32 13:32, 7 January 2022 diff hist +22 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:28 13:28, 7 January 2022 diff hist +850 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:22 13:22, 7 January 2022 diff hist +218 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 13:20 13:20, 7 January 2022 diff hist +1 Manchester No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:07 12:07, 7 January 2022 diff hist +1,102 Manchester Added a phrase regarding public polling data for Manchester Tag: Visual edit
- 11:51 11:51, 7 January 2022 diff hist +818 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 11:46 11:46, 7 January 2022 diff hist −1,527 Birmingham 2020 pop stats cited Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 11:43 11:43, 7 January 2022 diff hist +265 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 11:28 11:28, 7 January 2022 diff hist +163 Talk:Manchester →RfC
5 January 2022
- 19:12 19:12, 5 January 2022 diff hist +133 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 19:08 19:08, 5 January 2022 diff hist +1,342 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 11:13 11:13, 5 January 2022 diff hist +334 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 10:57 10:57, 5 January 2022 diff hist −556 Birmingham 2021 census data has come through. Second city reference is too controversial and disputed to be included in the opening paragraph. It is not a definitive fact, nor is it current and mainstream public opinion if you look at the citations of their own article. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
- 10:55 10:55, 5 January 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Birmingham →Bizarre population vandalism.
- 10:55 10:55, 5 January 2022 diff hist +405 Talk:Birmingham →Bizarre population vandalism.
1 January 2022
A user with 43 edits. Account created on 1 January 2022.
24 July 2022
- 22:11 22:11, 24 July 2022 diff hist +291 m Manchester changed grammer Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 22:08 22:08, 24 July 2022 diff hist +118 Manchester No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 22:06 22:06, 24 July 2022 diff hist +24 Talk:Manchester No edit summary Tag: Reverted
7 July 2022
- 20:00 20:00, 7 July 2022 diff hist +436 m Manchester Undid revision 1096341220 by Cordless Larry ( talk) Take to talk Tag: Undo
3 July 2022
- 20:44 20:44, 3 July 2022 diff hist +436 m Manchester Undid revision 1096108533 by DragonofBatley ( talk) References indicate Manchester is a major city. If you undo again, I will report you for vandalism. Tags: Undo Reverted
2 July 2022
- 08:31 08:31, 2 July 2022 diff hist +2 m BBC News minor edit to header, spelling and grammer Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:31 08:31, 2 July 2022 diff hist +24 m BBC News edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:30 08:30, 2 July 2022 diff hist +369 m BBC News edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:28 08:28, 2 July 2022 diff hist +436 m Manchester edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 08:26 08:26, 2 July 2022 diff hist −560 m Birmingham edited header Tags: Reverted Visual edit
10 February 2022
- 18:50 18:50, 10 February 2022 diff hist +1,713 Manchester Undid revision 1070688565 by Shearonink ( talk) I notice you have not deleted the same phrase from the Birmingham article. Before taking unilateral action, please consult the talk page. Thanks Tag: Undo
8 February 2022
- 18:48 18:48, 8 February 2022 diff hist +1,713 Manchester Undid revision 1069973988 by Stevo1000 ( talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
26 January 2022
- 10:57 10:57, 26 January 2022 diff hist −151 m Birmingham corrected a pop stat for urban area that was incorrect Tag: Visual edit
- 10:56 10:56, 26 January 2022 diff hist +244 Birmingham minor change to the lead paragraph correcting data and adding a source. Tag: Visual edit
12 January 2022
- 17:59 17:59, 12 January 2022 diff hist +896 Birmingham Reverted changes made to the lead paragraph regarding second city status. NOTICE TO EDITORS, an agreement was establish per an RfC whereby this clause was to be added unless the phrase regarding Birmingham second city status was to be removed. An agreement was reached whereby we apply this disputed phrase at the end the sentence in both Manchester and Birmingham articles. If you have an issue with this agreement, then take to the talk place and reach consensus before making unilateral changes. Tag: Visual edit
10 January 2022
- 19:00 19:00, 10 January 2022 diff hist 0 Economy of Europe No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
8 January 2022
- 22:25 22:25, 8 January 2022 diff hist +303 Manchester Added citation for phrase. Tag: Visual edit
- 22:21 22:21, 8 January 2022 diff hist −48 Manchester Matched the phrased used for the Birmingham article for consistency as the entire sentence has a intertwined editorial agreement for both articles. Tag: Visual edit
7 January 2022
- 23:19 23:19, 7 January 2022 diff hist +20 Manchester No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 23:18 23:18, 7 January 2022 diff hist +97 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 23:17 23:17, 7 January 2022 diff hist +125 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 23:16 23:16, 7 January 2022 diff hist −5 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 23:15 23:15, 7 January 2022 diff hist +314 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:33 13:33, 7 January 2022 diff hist +10 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:33 13:33, 7 January 2022 diff hist +47 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:32 13:32, 7 January 2022 diff hist +22 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:28 13:28, 7 January 2022 diff hist +850 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 13:22 13:22, 7 January 2022 diff hist +218 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 13:20 13:20, 7 January 2022 diff hist +1 Manchester No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:07 12:07, 7 January 2022 diff hist +1,102 Manchester Added a phrase regarding public polling data for Manchester Tag: Visual edit
- 11:51 11:51, 7 January 2022 diff hist +818 Talk:Birmingham →Why we may need to give Birmingham and Manchester semi-protection
- 11:46 11:46, 7 January 2022 diff hist −1,527 Birmingham 2020 pop stats cited Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 11:43 11:43, 7 January 2022 diff hist +265 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 11:28 11:28, 7 January 2022 diff hist +163 Talk:Manchester →RfC
5 January 2022
- 19:12 19:12, 5 January 2022 diff hist +133 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 19:08 19:08, 5 January 2022 diff hist +1,342 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 11:13 11:13, 5 January 2022 diff hist +334 Talk:Manchester →RfC
- 10:57 10:57, 5 January 2022 diff hist −556 Birmingham 2021 census data has come through. Second city reference is too controversial and disputed to be included in the opening paragraph. It is not a definitive fact, nor is it current and mainstream public opinion if you look at the citations of their own article. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
- 10:55 10:55, 5 January 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Birmingham →Bizarre population vandalism.
- 10:55 10:55, 5 January 2022 diff hist +405 Talk:Birmingham →Bizarre population vandalism.