A user with 55 edits. Account created on 2 April 2015.
7 October 2018
- 08:04 08:04, 7 October 2018 diff hist +93 m Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
- 07:54 07:54, 7 October 2018 diff hist +337 m Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
6 October 2018
- 19:39 19:39, 6 October 2018 diff hist +2,980 Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
- 06:41 06:41, 6 October 2018 diff hist +677 Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
5 October 2018
- 19:58 19:58, 5 October 2018 diff hist +11 m Royal Rife typos
- 19:56 19:56, 5 October 2018 diff hist +256 m Royal Rife Added back Smithsonian Institutes examination/vetting of Rife's Universal Microscope. "Weak source" stated as reason for removal by Alexbrn, so I found primary source in Smithsonian's own archives.
- 19:49 19:49, 5 October 2018 diff hist +1,089 Talk:Royal Rife Smithsonian vetting of his microscope in 1944 annual report is a major pro-Rife point deleted here in favor of standardized bashing of the man's complex life that intersected with many powerful personalities and institutions.
- 07:23 07:23, 5 October 2018 diff hist +482 m Royal Rife This article is a disgrace by comparison with Lynes'Book, subtly denigrated here by surrounding sentences (non sequitur). It is an excellent work -- highly substantiated. // Rosner's book is used by many Lyme patients and outlines the serious devices in use today; not the fraudulent garbage that also exists - all that is highlighted herein. This topic demands current expertise, not cited old AMA opinions from more than 20 years ago. As written, this needs work. – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← →
- 06:39 06:39, 5 October 2018 diff hist +394 m Royal Rife This article is unfair to Rife. I'm trying to balance it. The work w/ resonant frequencies to kill pathogens is ongoing. Anthony Holland of Novobiotronics is a leader in this field right now and I have included him. I am a medical book writer, a professional with solid studies in Rife's work. This article is trying to trash him, largely using AMA critics. I would suggest it is more complex and as yet undecided -- using EMF to kill pathogens. AMA membership is way down, btw - only 25% of MDs.
4 October 2018
- 19:05 19:05, 4 October 2018 diff hist −6 m Royal Rife I found the article cited. It referred to a single (ONE) device analyzed: "Electronics Australia magazine, which has been campaigning against the gadgets, analysed one and found that it consisted of a nine-volt battery, some wiring, a switch, a timer and two short lengths of copper tubing - components worth about $15. The electrical current delivered was "almost undetectable" and unlikely even to penetrate the skin, let alone kill any organism."
- 06:51 06:51, 4 October 2018 diff hist +53 Royal Rife No edit summary
- 06:49 06:49, 4 October 2018 diff hist −23 m Royal Rife added small transition to make sence of one sentence that follows another.
- 06:45 06:45, 4 October 2018 diff hist −121 m Royal Rife removed a sentence I had added previously, since I could not find citation for it.
- 06:43 06:43, 4 October 2018 diff hist +1,416 m Royal Rife The Smithsonian board of regent's report and review of Rife's microscope in 1944 -- published by them - is of great significance and alone makes Rife worthy of serious consideration -- I have added mention of this report and cited it at the outset of the article, as the whole entry seeks to minimize or even slander Rife's importance eight from the start, discouraging the serious reader. One need only READ the report to see Rife's genius.
3 October 2018
- 06:39 06:39, 3 October 2018 diff hist −23 m Thomas McPherson Brown typo re sentence fitting and making sense
- 06:36 06:36, 3 October 2018 diff hist −21 m Thomas McPherson Brown The fact of Brown's career and his substantial remission rate for RA stated at top of article here contradicts the use of "small" improvement at end of article, as does MIRA trial -- famous -- cited here.
- 06:34 06:34, 3 October 2018 diff hist +21 m Thomas McPherson Brown Consistency in referring to Brown's success level with his antibiotic treatment -- stated to be significant at top of article then called 'small' at end of article in previous version. His result were in fact significant.
- 06:30 06:30, 3 October 2018 diff hist +258 m Thomas McPherson Brown The fact of Brown's career and his substantial remission rate for RA stated at top of article here contradicts the use of "small" improvement at end of article, as does MIRA trial -- famous -- cited here.
18 May 2015
- 18:22 18:22, 18 May 2015 diff hist +182 Ghostwriter Added a line about Ian McKewan -- among the top 50 living British writers -- very elegantly explaining why the return of the novella format is so welcome. Great citation, choice information to help a reader decide on length and cost of a book project.
- 08:19 08:19, 18 May 2015 diff hist −7 m Ghostwriter No edit summary
- 08:17 08:17, 18 May 2015 diff hist +1,934 Ghostwriter This edit - worked out in a sandbox set up by NeilN - adds a new starting price in the world market for the shorter book like the Kindle Singles. This market was scarce before Kindle & other digital readers and distribution/Only top 2ndary sources cited.
13 May 2015
- 07:37 07:37, 13 May 2015 diff hist +64 User:NeilN/sandbox →Remuneration and credit
- 07:35 07:35, 13 May 2015 diff hist +489 Talk:Ghostwriter →Remuneration and credit
10 May 2015
- 19:52 19:52, 10 May 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page
- 19:26 19:26, 10 May 2015 diff hist +21 m User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page
- 19:26 19:26, 10 May 2015 diff hist +172 m User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page
- 08:45 08:45, 10 May 2015 diff hist +5 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
9 May 2015
- 07:00 07:00, 9 May 2015 diff hist −48 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 06:56 06:56, 9 May 2015 diff hist −63 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 06:54 06:54, 9 May 2015 diff hist +629 User:NeilN/sandbox →Remuneration and credit
- 06:23 06:23, 9 May 2015 diff hist −2 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 05:53 05:53, 9 May 2015 diff hist +88 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 05:52 05:52, 9 May 2015 diff hist +1,023 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
8 May 2015
- 21:40 21:40, 8 May 2015 diff hist +1,038 User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page: new section
- 21:32 21:32, 8 May 2015 diff hist +1,268 Talk:Ghostwriter →Remuneration and credit
6 May 2015
- 23:44 23:44, 6 May 2015 diff hist +6,734 Talk:Ghostwriter →Manhattan Literary
13 April 2015
- 22:13 22:13, 13 April 2015 diff hist +159 Talk:Ghostwriter →Manhattan Literary
- 18:48 18:48, 13 April 2015 diff hist +3,828 Talk:Ghostwriter Followup with more argument, & question: How is this resolved?
12 April 2015
- 06:36 06:36, 12 April 2015 diff hist +4,737 Talk:Ghostwriter →Manhattan Literary: explanation for inclusion of M-Lit. and other edits by Marikwiki77
11 April 2015
- 18:45 18:45, 11 April 2015 diff hist +94 User talk:Mariwiki77 →Edit warring and socking
- 06:34 06:34, 11 April 2015 diff hist +2,185 User talk:NeilN →GHOSTWRITER PAGE, RECENT ISSUES AS OF 11 APRIL 2015: new section
- 06:26 06:26, 11 April 2015 diff hist +1,849 User talk:198.22.122.12 Justification according to NeilN's criteria -- Wikipedia looks for secondary sources as valid references: "Please do not add references which are actually links to whatever a company is selling."
- 05:46 05:46, 11 April 2015 diff hist +236 Ghostwriter No edit summary
10 April 2015
- 21:05 21:05, 10 April 2015 diff hist +99 Ghostwriter After Pink Beasts good cleanup, added a few constructive, carefully researched details, in Remuneration and Credit section, re ghosts and authorship credit. I work in publishing and know this is a very sensitive issue - central to hiring a ghostwriter.
- 20:56 20:56, 10 April 2015 diff hist +2,067 Ghostwriter After Pink Beasts good cleanup, added a few constructive, carefully researched details, in Remuneration and Credit section, re ghosts and authorship credit. I work in publishing and know this is a very sensitive issue - central to hiring a ghostwriter.
5 April 2015
- 17:59 17:59, 5 April 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:Amaury →Thanks! Tag: Possible vandalism
- 04:46 04:46, 5 April 2015 diff hist +59 N User:Mariwiki77 ←Created page with 'This is the start of the user page for Mariwiki77. Rgds/M.' current
2 April 2015
- 17:54 17:54, 2 April 2015 diff hist +2,346 User talk:NeilN →Ghostwriting Page - re Remuneration and Credit: new section
- 17:52 17:52, 2 April 2015 diff hist +2,292 User talk:NeilN No edit summary
- 17:19 17:19, 2 April 2015 diff hist +965 Ghostwriter Undid revision 654656643 by Kww ( talk)
A user with 55 edits. Account created on 2 April 2015.
7 October 2018
- 08:04 08:04, 7 October 2018 diff hist +93 m Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
- 07:54 07:54, 7 October 2018 diff hist +337 m Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
6 October 2018
- 19:39 19:39, 6 October 2018 diff hist +2,980 Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
- 06:41 06:41, 6 October 2018 diff hist +677 Talk:Royal Rife →Really?
5 October 2018
- 19:58 19:58, 5 October 2018 diff hist +11 m Royal Rife typos
- 19:56 19:56, 5 October 2018 diff hist +256 m Royal Rife Added back Smithsonian Institutes examination/vetting of Rife's Universal Microscope. "Weak source" stated as reason for removal by Alexbrn, so I found primary source in Smithsonian's own archives.
- 19:49 19:49, 5 October 2018 diff hist +1,089 Talk:Royal Rife Smithsonian vetting of his microscope in 1944 annual report is a major pro-Rife point deleted here in favor of standardized bashing of the man's complex life that intersected with many powerful personalities and institutions.
- 07:23 07:23, 5 October 2018 diff hist +482 m Royal Rife This article is a disgrace by comparison with Lynes'Book, subtly denigrated here by surrounding sentences (non sequitur). It is an excellent work -- highly substantiated. // Rosner's book is used by many Lyme patients and outlines the serious devices in use today; not the fraudulent garbage that also exists - all that is highlighted herein. This topic demands current expertise, not cited old AMA opinions from more than 20 years ago. As written, this needs work. – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← →
- 06:39 06:39, 5 October 2018 diff hist +394 m Royal Rife This article is unfair to Rife. I'm trying to balance it. The work w/ resonant frequencies to kill pathogens is ongoing. Anthony Holland of Novobiotronics is a leader in this field right now and I have included him. I am a medical book writer, a professional with solid studies in Rife's work. This article is trying to trash him, largely using AMA critics. I would suggest it is more complex and as yet undecided -- using EMF to kill pathogens. AMA membership is way down, btw - only 25% of MDs.
4 October 2018
- 19:05 19:05, 4 October 2018 diff hist −6 m Royal Rife I found the article cited. It referred to a single (ONE) device analyzed: "Electronics Australia magazine, which has been campaigning against the gadgets, analysed one and found that it consisted of a nine-volt battery, some wiring, a switch, a timer and two short lengths of copper tubing - components worth about $15. The electrical current delivered was "almost undetectable" and unlikely even to penetrate the skin, let alone kill any organism."
- 06:51 06:51, 4 October 2018 diff hist +53 Royal Rife No edit summary
- 06:49 06:49, 4 October 2018 diff hist −23 m Royal Rife added small transition to make sence of one sentence that follows another.
- 06:45 06:45, 4 October 2018 diff hist −121 m Royal Rife removed a sentence I had added previously, since I could not find citation for it.
- 06:43 06:43, 4 October 2018 diff hist +1,416 m Royal Rife The Smithsonian board of regent's report and review of Rife's microscope in 1944 -- published by them - is of great significance and alone makes Rife worthy of serious consideration -- I have added mention of this report and cited it at the outset of the article, as the whole entry seeks to minimize or even slander Rife's importance eight from the start, discouraging the serious reader. One need only READ the report to see Rife's genius.
3 October 2018
- 06:39 06:39, 3 October 2018 diff hist −23 m Thomas McPherson Brown typo re sentence fitting and making sense
- 06:36 06:36, 3 October 2018 diff hist −21 m Thomas McPherson Brown The fact of Brown's career and his substantial remission rate for RA stated at top of article here contradicts the use of "small" improvement at end of article, as does MIRA trial -- famous -- cited here.
- 06:34 06:34, 3 October 2018 diff hist +21 m Thomas McPherson Brown Consistency in referring to Brown's success level with his antibiotic treatment -- stated to be significant at top of article then called 'small' at end of article in previous version. His result were in fact significant.
- 06:30 06:30, 3 October 2018 diff hist +258 m Thomas McPherson Brown The fact of Brown's career and his substantial remission rate for RA stated at top of article here contradicts the use of "small" improvement at end of article, as does MIRA trial -- famous -- cited here.
18 May 2015
- 18:22 18:22, 18 May 2015 diff hist +182 Ghostwriter Added a line about Ian McKewan -- among the top 50 living British writers -- very elegantly explaining why the return of the novella format is so welcome. Great citation, choice information to help a reader decide on length and cost of a book project.
- 08:19 08:19, 18 May 2015 diff hist −7 m Ghostwriter No edit summary
- 08:17 08:17, 18 May 2015 diff hist +1,934 Ghostwriter This edit - worked out in a sandbox set up by NeilN - adds a new starting price in the world market for the shorter book like the Kindle Singles. This market was scarce before Kindle & other digital readers and distribution/Only top 2ndary sources cited.
13 May 2015
- 07:37 07:37, 13 May 2015 diff hist +64 User:NeilN/sandbox →Remuneration and credit
- 07:35 07:35, 13 May 2015 diff hist +489 Talk:Ghostwriter →Remuneration and credit
10 May 2015
- 19:52 19:52, 10 May 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page
- 19:26 19:26, 10 May 2015 diff hist +21 m User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page
- 19:26 19:26, 10 May 2015 diff hist +172 m User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page
- 08:45 08:45, 10 May 2015 diff hist +5 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
9 May 2015
- 07:00 07:00, 9 May 2015 diff hist −48 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 06:56 06:56, 9 May 2015 diff hist −63 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 06:54 06:54, 9 May 2015 diff hist +629 User:NeilN/sandbox →Remuneration and credit
- 06:23 06:23, 9 May 2015 diff hist −2 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 05:53 05:53, 9 May 2015 diff hist +88 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
- 05:52 05:52, 9 May 2015 diff hist +1,023 User:NeilN/sandbox No edit summary
8 May 2015
- 21:40 21:40, 8 May 2015 diff hist +1,038 User talk:NeilN →Manhattan Literary addition on Ghostwriter page: new section
- 21:32 21:32, 8 May 2015 diff hist +1,268 Talk:Ghostwriter →Remuneration and credit
6 May 2015
- 23:44 23:44, 6 May 2015 diff hist +6,734 Talk:Ghostwriter →Manhattan Literary
13 April 2015
- 22:13 22:13, 13 April 2015 diff hist +159 Talk:Ghostwriter →Manhattan Literary
- 18:48 18:48, 13 April 2015 diff hist +3,828 Talk:Ghostwriter Followup with more argument, & question: How is this resolved?
12 April 2015
- 06:36 06:36, 12 April 2015 diff hist +4,737 Talk:Ghostwriter →Manhattan Literary: explanation for inclusion of M-Lit. and other edits by Marikwiki77
11 April 2015
- 18:45 18:45, 11 April 2015 diff hist +94 User talk:Mariwiki77 →Edit warring and socking
- 06:34 06:34, 11 April 2015 diff hist +2,185 User talk:NeilN →GHOSTWRITER PAGE, RECENT ISSUES AS OF 11 APRIL 2015: new section
- 06:26 06:26, 11 April 2015 diff hist +1,849 User talk:198.22.122.12 Justification according to NeilN's criteria -- Wikipedia looks for secondary sources as valid references: "Please do not add references which are actually links to whatever a company is selling."
- 05:46 05:46, 11 April 2015 diff hist +236 Ghostwriter No edit summary
10 April 2015
- 21:05 21:05, 10 April 2015 diff hist +99 Ghostwriter After Pink Beasts good cleanup, added a few constructive, carefully researched details, in Remuneration and Credit section, re ghosts and authorship credit. I work in publishing and know this is a very sensitive issue - central to hiring a ghostwriter.
- 20:56 20:56, 10 April 2015 diff hist +2,067 Ghostwriter After Pink Beasts good cleanup, added a few constructive, carefully researched details, in Remuneration and Credit section, re ghosts and authorship credit. I work in publishing and know this is a very sensitive issue - central to hiring a ghostwriter.
5 April 2015
- 17:59 17:59, 5 April 2015 diff hist 0 m User talk:Amaury →Thanks! Tag: Possible vandalism
- 04:46 04:46, 5 April 2015 diff hist +59 N User:Mariwiki77 ←Created page with 'This is the start of the user page for Mariwiki77. Rgds/M.' current
2 April 2015
- 17:54 17:54, 2 April 2015 diff hist +2,346 User talk:NeilN →Ghostwriting Page - re Remuneration and Credit: new section
- 17:52 17:52, 2 April 2015 diff hist +2,292 User talk:NeilN No edit summary
- 17:19 17:19, 2 April 2015 diff hist +965 Ghostwriter Undid revision 654656643 by Kww ( talk)